LISTSERV 16.0 - UVMFLOWNET Archives

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

UVMFLOWNET Archives

February 2002

View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

		LISTSERV Archives
		UVMFLOWNET Home

Subject	From	Date	Size
12 Month Cardiac School Now Accepting Enrollment!	Lori Green <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 9 Feb 2002 11:36:53 -0500	164 lines
Re: 12 Month Cardiac School Now Accepting Enrollment!	Jim Baun, RVT <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 9 Feb 2002 14:07:49 EST	19 lines
Re: 12 Month Cardiac School Now Accepting Enrollment!	Lori Green <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 9 Feb 2002 16:08:59 -0500	35 lines
Re: 12 Month Cardiac School Now Accepting Enrollment!	Tony Ayo <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:44:07 EST	32 lines
Re: 12 Month Cardiac School Now Accepting Enrollment!	Case, Terry <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:08:36 -0500	52 lines
Re: 12 Month Cardiac School Now Accepting Enrollment!	Douglas Marcum <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 12 Feb 2002 19:31:47 +0000	30 lines
Re: 12 Month Cardiac School Now Accepting Enrollment!	Milburn, Donald T (MED) <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 12 Feb 2002 14:04:28 -0600	69 lines
Re: 12 Month Cardiac School Now Accepting Enrollment!	Kathy Palmieri <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:40:45 EST	38 lines
Re: 12 Month Cardiac School Now Accepting Enrollment!	Lori Green <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:50:40 -0500	79 lines
Re: 12 Month Cardiac School Now Accepting Enrollment!	Hodge, Megan D. <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:13:32 -0600	68 lines
Re: 12 Month Cardiac School Now Accepting Enrollment!	Case, Terry <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 13:17:55 -0500	138 lines
2 job openings in CA	Kay Yost <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 15:45:15 +0000	19 lines
25 years of excellence	Johnson, Bonnie L. <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:23:20 -0800	29 lines
<No subject>	Douglas Marcum <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 26 Feb 2002 12:52:18 +0000	34 lines
ABI's for venous stasis ulcers	Kay Yost <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:43:48 +0000	15 lines
Re: ABI's for venous stasis ulcers	Michael, Dwight <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 11 Feb 2002 16:44:25 -0600	95 lines
Re: ABI's for venous stasis ulcers	Kim Cantwell-Gab <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:15:19 -0800	71 lines
Re: ABI's for venous stasis ulcers	O'Brien, Carmen <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:00:00 -0800	119 lines
Re: ABI's for venous stasis ulcers	Cardullo, Paul <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 11 Feb 2002 18:01:28 -0500	40 lines
Re: ABI's for venous stasis ulcers	Doug O'Reilly <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 12 Feb 2002 07:00:20 +0800	109 lines
Re: ABI's for venous stasis ulcers	Kay Yost <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:26:41 +0000	54 lines
ARDMS Registry Requirements post 2004	Michael, Dwight <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 13:56:40 -0600	10 lines
Re: ARDMS Registry Requirements post 2004	Victoria Goodrich <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 15:25:04 -0500	20 lines
Re: ARDMS Registry Requirements post 2004	Kay Yost <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 20:35:22 +0000	24 lines
Re: ARDMS Registry Requirements post 2004	Michael, Dwight <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 15:26:59 -0600	122 lines
Re: ARDMS Registry Requirements post 2004	Case, Terry <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 17:07:24 -0500	119 lines
Re: ARDMS Registry Requirements post 2004	Diana Ross, RT, RDMS <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 02:14:14 -0800	101 lines
Are we being phased out?	Hodge, Megan D. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:35:29 -0600	38 lines
Re: Are we being phased out?	Johnson, Bonnie L. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:08:46 -0800	61 lines
Re: Are we being phased out?	Kim Cantwell-Gab <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:43:47 -0800	13 lines
Re: Are we being phased out?	Johnson, Bonnie L. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:41:56 -0800	28 lines
Re: Are we being phased out?	Hodge, Megan D. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 Feb 2002 14:02:34 -0600	79 lines
Re: Are we being phased out?	Johnson, Bonnie L. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 Feb 2002 12:42:39 -0800	110 lines
Re: Are we being phased out?	Barton A. Bean <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 Feb 2002 22:11:05 -0800	119 lines
Re: Are we being phased out?	Bill Schroedter <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:55:15 EST	28 lines
Re: Are we being phased out?	Johnson, Bonnie L. <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:04:48 -0800	149 lines
Re: Are we being phased out?	Joan P Baker <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:07:50 -0800	49 lines
Re: Are we being phased out?	paul hrdlick <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 26 Feb 2002 23:09:55 -0500	127 lines
Re: Are we being phased out?	Barton A. Bean <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 26 Feb 2002 21:14:41 -0800	176 lines
Re: Are we being phased out?	Bill Schroedter <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 27 Feb 2002 08:51:27 EST	26 lines
Re: Are we being phased out? -Reply	Paul Hrdlick <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 27 Feb 2002 13:12:50 -0500	10 lines
Re: Are we being phased out? -Reply	Paul Hrdlick <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 27 Feb 2002 13:14:18 -0500	10 lines
Re: Are we being phased out? -Reply	Bill Schroedter <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 27 Feb 2002 15:45:50 EST	27 lines
Re: Are we being phased out? -Reply	Franklin W. West <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 27 Feb 2002 13:20:37 -0800	48 lines
Re: Are we being phased out? -Reply	LeAnn Maupin <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 27 Feb 2002 14:17:37 -0800	54 lines
Re: Are we being phased out? -Reply	Joan P Baker <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 27 Feb 2002 14:40:31 -0800	90 lines
Re: Are we being phased out? -Reply	Hodge, Megan D. <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 27 Feb 2002 16:56:41 -0600	119 lines
Re: Are we being phased out? -Reply	Johnson, Bonnie L. <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 27 Feb 2002 16:08:57 -0800	154 lines
Re: Are we being phased out? -Reply	Allene Woodley <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 28 Feb 2002 08:00:50 -0500	50 lines
Re: Are we being phased out? -Reply	Franklin W. West <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 28 Feb 2002 08:12:49 -0800	97 lines
Cindy Burnham's Algorithm	Lucy Seoane <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:26:20 -0500	40 lines
CVT Position	TOM RICE <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 8 Feb 2002 08:39:11 -0500	32 lines
Enconcert	Debs Denton <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 27 Feb 2002 19:43:57 -0500	11 lines
Re: Enconcert	kemil pilotte <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 27 Feb 2002 21:34:17 -0800	22 lines
False positive RA duplex	Ed Bernaski <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 3 Feb 2002 21:44:20 -0500	15 lines
Re: False positive RA duplex	Doug O'Reilly <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 21:53:46 +0800	30 lines
Re: False positive RA duplex	Knight, Steven J. <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 09:35:50 -0500	36 lines
Re: False positive RA duplex	Bill Schroedter <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 11:29:07 EST	44 lines
Re: False positive RA duplex	Johnson, Bonnie L. <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:11:32 -0800	46 lines
Re: False positive RA duplex	Ed Bernaski <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 8 Feb 2002 01:21:06 -0500	73 lines
Re: False positive RA duplex	Johnson, Bonnie L. <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 8 Feb 2002 08:17:57 -0800	90 lines
Re: False positive RA duplex	fazeel <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 11 Feb 2002 01:13:32 +0500	114 lines
Re: False positive RA duplex	Nancy & Russ Krupp <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 10 Feb 2002 16:39:56 -0500	119 lines
Re: False positive RA duplex	Johnson, Bonnie L. <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 11 Feb 2002 08:58:49 -0800	132 lines
Re: False positive RA duplex	Ed Bernaski <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:24:27 -0500	68 lines
Re: False positive RA duplex	Shelly Burns <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:58:00 EST	35 lines
Fw: Ulrasound Diagnostic Schools...	Joan P Baker <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 20:51:13 -0800	125 lines
Re: Fw: Ulrasound Diagnostic Schools...	Diana Ross, RT, RDMS <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 01:49:25 -0800	85 lines
Re: Fw: Ulrasound Diagnostic Schools...	paul hrdlick <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:20:29 -0500	94 lines
Re: Fw: Ulrasound Diagnostic Schools...	Case, Terry <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 10:00:54 -0500	75 lines
Re: Fw: Ulrasound Diagnostic Schools...	paul hrdlick <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 10:44:06 -0500	41 lines
Re: Fw: Ulrasound Diagnostic Schools...	....Richard G. Brebner <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:39:21 EST	38 lines
Re: Fw: Ulrasound Diagnostic Schools...	Diana Ross, RT, RDMS <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 7 Feb 2002 13:45:01 -0800	81 lines
Re: Fw: Ulrasound Diagnostic Schools...	paul hrdlick <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 7 Feb 2002 17:02:38 -0500	127 lines
Re: Fw: Ulrasound Diagnostic Schools...	Joan P Baker <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 7 Feb 2002 16:05:42 -0800	25 lines
Re: Fw: Ulrasound Diagnostic Schools...	Diana Ross <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:29:30 -0600	161 lines
Re: Fw: Ulrasound Diagnostic Schools...	Diana Ross <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:34:17 -0600	45 lines
Re: Fw: Ulrasound Diagnostic Schools...	Ross, Diana <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 8 Feb 2002 08:50:16 -0800	66 lines
Re: Fw: Ulrasound Diagnostic Schools...	Ross, Diana <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 8 Feb 2002 08:58:08 -0800	88 lines
Re: Fw: Ulrasound Diagnostic Schools...	Joan P Baker <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:58:35 -0800	63 lines
Re: Fw: Ultrasound Diagnostic Schools...	Case, Terry <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:37:45 -0500	59 lines
Re: Fwd: ABC's Nightline Stroke	wjb <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 26 Feb 2002 09:16:00 -0600	36 lines
Fwd: ABC's Nightline Stroke Show	Mike Rush <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:54:56 EST	131 lines
Re: Fwd: ABC's Nightline Stroke Show	Jon Sevy and Sam Wagner-Sevy <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 25 Feb 2002 22:02:49 +0800	23 lines
imex	Terry Zwakenberg <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 12 Feb 2002 06:55:56 -0500	55 lines
in regards to Kay Yost post	Gallupe, Carol Jean <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 11:41:02 -0500	147 lines
Re: in regards to Kay Yost post	Sound Diagnosis <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:06:03 -0500	25 lines
job opening	Debs Denton <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 Feb 2002 16:44:40 -0500	13 lines
Job Opening	Hicks, Roberta <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 26 Feb 2002 15:59:21 -0800	16 lines
job openings	Jennifer L Dukoff <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:22:15 EST	41 lines
job opportunity	Erik Warner <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 3 Feb 2002 21:19:48 GMT	24 lines
Re: job opportunity	Hicks, Roberta <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 14:23:43 -0800	46 lines
Re: job opportunity	Hicks, Roberta <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 14:48:27 -0800	55 lines
Job Opportunity-MIAMI	Corey Oreskovich <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 25 Feb 2002 09:18:58 -0500	27 lines
Lawson: So nice to see the Flow-net flowing but I say...	Mark Lawson <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 Feb 2002 22:48:12 -0600	64 lines
list server for radiology techs	Patti Shandloff <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:48:14 -0500	17 lines
Re: list server for radiology techs	Knight, Steven J. <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 19:31:13 -0500	35 lines
Lorraine Pearlman/SIUH is out of the office.	Lorraine Pearlman <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 Feb 2002 18:08:22 -0500	11 lines
measuring caroitd stenosis	Jean Primozich <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 16 Feb 2002 02:08:54 -0800	97 lines
measuring carotid stenosis	Thomas Vallot <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 12 Feb 2002 19:36:46 -0600	116 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Kathy Palmieri <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 06:34:27 EST	60 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	paul hrdlick <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 07:25:59 -0500	59 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Jeff Stanley <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 08:33:58 -0600	106 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Bill Schroedter <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:07:58 EST	30 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Patti Shandloff <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:21:05 -0500	41 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Kate Holmes <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:25:16 -0500	35 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	paul hrdlick <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:26:54 -0500	39 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Jean Primozich <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 22:23:53 -0800	76 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Johnson, Bonnie L. <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:22:51 -0800	67 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Case, Terry <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 13:32:37 -0500	53 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Andy Wallace <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 13:07:35 -0800	127 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Jeff Stanley <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:23:21 -0600	89 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Hodge, Megan D. <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:30:46 -0600	59 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Jean Primozich <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 14 Feb 2002 03:50:50 -0800	113 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Thomas Vallot <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 19:10:11 -0600	78 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Johnson, Bonnie L. <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:49:41 -0800	130 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Barton A. Bean <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 21:58:31 -0800	23 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Kate Holmes <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 14 Feb 2002 08:17:37 -0500	118 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Bill Schroedter <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 14 Feb 2002 08:52:39 EST	31 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Kay Yost <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 14 Feb 2002 20:58:56 +0000	47 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Hodge, Megan D. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:50:36 -0600	86 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Jean Primozich <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 Feb 2002 02:51:11 -0800	120 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Kathy Palmieri <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 14 Feb 2002 18:48:55 EST	59 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Hodge, Megan D. <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 Feb 2002 08:36:10 -0600	158 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Diana Ross, RT, RDMS <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 16 Feb 2002 22:26:57 -0800	71 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Diana Ross, RT, RDMS <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 16 Feb 2002 22:30:55 -0800	60 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Deborah Richert <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 17 Feb 2002 13:11:27 -0600	79 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Craig Hume <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 Feb 2002 13:55:16 +0800	167 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Thomas Vallot <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 18 Feb 2002 18:09:52 -0600	69 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	udaya kumar <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 Feb 2002 05:28:36 +0530	83 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Deborah Richert <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 18 Feb 2002 20:09:21 -0600	99 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Knight, Steven J. <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 18 Feb 2002 22:09:07 -0500	128 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Mike Rush <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 18 Feb 2002 23:20:38 EST	36 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	linda sulzdorf <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 Feb 2002 13:05:48 -0500	151 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Kristin Combs <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 Feb 2002 19:18:13 EST	11 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Jean Primozich <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 20 Feb 2002 05:35:00 -0800	171 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Jean Primozich <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 20 Feb 2002 05:36:00 -0800	66 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Audrey Fleming <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 Feb 2002 21:16:30 EST	55 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Diana Ross, RT, RDMS <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 Feb 2002 19:48:19 -0800	146 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Diana Ross, RT, RDMS <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 Feb 2002 20:00:19 -0800	71 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	linda sulzdorf <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 20 Feb 2002 01:55:29 -0500	105 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Kim Cantwell-Gab <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 22 Feb 2002 17:18:15 -0800	36 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Jyotsna Vitale <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 23 Feb 2002 10:55:00 EST	11 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Kathy Palmieri <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 24 Feb 2002 19:09:17 EST	45 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	wjb <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 25 Feb 2002 09:20:00 -0600	34 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	linda sulzdorf <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 25 Feb 2002 13:59:01 -0500	52 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Deborah Richert <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 25 Feb 2002 21:11:00 -0600	56 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis	Hopkins, Robert MD <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 26 Feb 2002 09:19:57 -0500	59 lines
Re: measuring carotid stenosis and subclavian aneurysms	Diana Ross, RT, RDMS <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 16 Feb 2002 22:52:56 -0800	90 lines
My 2 Cents On Training	Jeff Field <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 11:04:43 -0500	20 lines
Re: My 2 Cents On Training	Kay Yost <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 16:32:10 +0000	30 lines
Re: My 2 Cents On Training	Jeff Field <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 11:44:20 -0500	103 lines
Re: My 2 Cents On Training	william rice <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 13:01:57 -0500	167 lines
Re: My 2 Cents On Training	Kay Yost <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 18:26:24 +0000	118 lines
Re: My 2 Cents On Training	Diana Ross <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 17:29:52 -0500	67 lines
New Email Address	Dana Holbrook <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 09:16:39 -0500	78 lines
Re: parks mini lab 3 for sale	AndrewB <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 7 Feb 2002 21:18:19 -0600	19 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Hodge, Megan D. <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 1 Feb 2002 09:25:58 -0600	64 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Cardullo, Paul <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 1 Feb 2002 10:59:02 -0500	58 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Kay Yost <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:11:45 +0000	46 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Kate Holmes <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 1 Feb 2002 11:11:45 -0500	147 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Michael, Dwight <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 1 Feb 2002 11:28:23 -0600	186 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Brenda Strickland <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 1 Feb 2002 15:47:45 EST	67 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Hodge, Megan D. <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:36:44 -0600	59 lines
Re: Pay Equity	stacey guillory <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 2 Feb 2002 09:31:32 -0800	117 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Don Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 2 Feb 2002 10:13:43 -0800	90 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Diana Ross, RT, RDMS <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 3 Feb 2002 10:43:58 -0800	60 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Nancy & Russ Krupp <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 3 Feb 2002 17:04:58 -0500	44 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Kay Yost <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 15:54:50 +0000	140 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Bill Schroedter <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 11:09:18 EST	34 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Troillett, Rhonda D <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:39:57 -0600	122 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Case, Terry <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 13:17:52 -0500	137 lines
Re: Pay Equity	paul hrdlick <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 14:06:31 -0500	147 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Joy Sabota <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 14:21:14 -0500	12 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Michael, Dwight <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 13:45:46 -0600	113 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Ross, Diana <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 14:38:43 -0800	50 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Case, Terry <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 17:36:47 -0500	64 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Diana Ross, RT, RDMS <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 19:40:40 -0800	132 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Brenda Strickland <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 23:20:28 EST	10 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Brenda Strickland <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 00:09:07 EST	36 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Teddie Gawley <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 06:54:58 GMT	16 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Hodge, Megan D. <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 09:28:48 -0600	76 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Kay Yost <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 15:32:17 +0000	94 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Hodge, Megan D. <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 09:47:45 -0600	103 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Diana Ross <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 17:22:59 -0500	96 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Jose Alex Lugo <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 20:18:59 -0500	142 lines
Re: Pay Equity	Bill Vandenberg <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 19:51:26 -0600	96 lines
Please remove from list	Chris Caster <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 16:35:39 -0800	13 lines
practioner status	Terry Zwakenberg <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 12 Feb 2002 07:11:28 -0500	95 lines
Re: practioner status	priscilla hart <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 12 Feb 2002 20:57:08 -0500	57 lines
Re: practioner status	Johnson, Bonnie L. <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:08:40 -0800	73 lines
Re: practioner status	Joan P Baker <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:57:03 -0800	95 lines
Re: practioner status	Kate Holmes <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 13:12:34 -0500	101 lines
Re: practioner status	Joan P Baker <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:09:31 -0800	162 lines
Re: practioner status	Johnson, Bonnie L. <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:29:51 -0800	185 lines
Practitioner	Sound Diagnosis <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:19:28 -0500	32 lines
Re: Practitioner	steve bernhardt <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:05:11 -0800	35 lines
Re: Practitioner	Joan P Baker <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:09:46 -0800	93 lines
Re: Protocol	Marsha Neumyer <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 12:56:05 -0500	24 lines
Publisher request	Dennis Walter <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:16:30 -0500	14 lines
Re: Publisher request	Myers, Ruth <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:36:25 -0500	23 lines
Re: Publisher request	Kathy Palmieri <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 Feb 2002 16:17:37 EST	40 lines
Re: Publisher request	Terry Zwakenberg <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 16 Feb 2002 07:23:01 -0500	38 lines
Recall: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Jeff Stanley <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 11:38:44 -0600	10 lines
Re: Recall: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Johnson, Bonnie L. <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 09:40:02 -0800	28 lines
Re: Recall: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Jeff Stanley <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 12:35:43 -0600	37 lines
Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Brian Adkins <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 10:39:07 -0500	14 lines
Re: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Michael, Dwight <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 10:21:12 -0600	56 lines
Re: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Case, Terry <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 11:44:56 -0500	44 lines
Re: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Jeff Stanley <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 11:02:57 -0600	75 lines
Re: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Jeff Stanley <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 11:34:21 -0600	65 lines
Re: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Kate Holmes <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 13:48:57 -0500	54 lines
Re: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Audrey Fleming <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 14:04:48 EST	122 lines
Re: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Jeff Stanley <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 13:37:21 -0600	66 lines
Re: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Diana Ross <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 17:26:17 -0500	54 lines
Re: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Diana Ross <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 16:31:37 -0600	69 lines
Re: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	paul hrdlick <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 18:25:29 -0500	79 lines
Re: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Diana Ross, RT, RDMS <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 02:00:23 -0800	117 lines
Re: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Don Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:21:22 -0800	47 lines
Re: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Mike Rush <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:52:25 EST	31 lines
Re: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Don Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 10:01:49 -0800	29 lines
Re: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Jeff Stanley <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:29:47 -0600	42 lines
Re: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Johnson, Bonnie L. <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 10:26:45 -0800	59 lines
Re: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Hodge, Megan D. <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:33:54 -0600	69 lines
Re: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Jeff Stanley <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 14:01:51 -0600	80 lines
Re: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Mike Rush <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 16:34:24 EST	31 lines
Re: Response to OJT vs Formal Educated techs.	Vallery, Linda <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:49:32 -0800	36 lines
RVT job openining in sunny Florida	Patti Shandloff <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 11 Feb 2002 10:51:16 -0500	24 lines
Sarasota, FL RVT for hire	Tom Hargens <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 27 Feb 2002 19:32:35 EST	41 lines
Shakespeare!	Diana Ross, RT, RDMS <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 7 Feb 2002 13:47:01 -0800	80 lines
Re: Shakespeare!	Polly DeCann Wilson <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 7 Feb 2002 18:44:13 EST	23 lines
Siemen's dissertation project	Joan P Baker <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 25 Feb 2002 09:57:03 -0800	68 lines
Sonography vs Vascular Technology	Johnson, Bonnie L. <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 09:18:52 -0800	48 lines
Re: Sonography vs Vascular Technology	Kate Holmes <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 13:04:58 -0500	54 lines
Re: Sonography vs Vascular Technology	Johnson, Bonnie L. <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 10:21:19 -0800	72 lines
SPECIAL ADVANCED-LEVEL CARDIOVASCULAR/WOMEN'S RADIOLOGY CME PROGRAM	Lori Green <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 23 Feb 2002 12:03:53 -0500	173 lines
SPECIAL ADVANCED-LEVEL CARDIOVASCULAR/WOMEN'S RADIOLOGY CME PROGRAM: CORRECTION	Lori Green <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:53:20 -0500	58 lines
strategies for recruitment and retention.	Hodge, Megan D. <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 Feb 2002 10:50:39 -0600	32 lines
Re: strategies for recruitment and retention.	paul hrdlick <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 Feb 2002 13:09:04 -0500	42 lines
Re: strategies for recruitment and retention.	Michael, Dwight <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 Feb 2002 12:34:26 -0600	150 lines
Re: strategies for recruitment and retention.	Tess Gulla-Meyer R.V.T., R.D.C.S. <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 Feb 2002 13:55:08 EST	30 lines
Re: strategies for recruitment and retention.	Johnson, Bonnie L. <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 Feb 2002 11:12:42 -0800	88 lines
Re: strategies for recruitment and retention.	Joseph P. Hughes <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:52:31 -0500	106 lines
Re: strategies for recruitment and retention.	Mike Rush <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 Feb 2002 16:36:20 EST	37 lines
Re: strategies for recruitment and retention.	Marc Puckett - Horizon Vascular Surgery <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 Feb 2002 16:41:02 -0500	19 lines
Re: strategies for recruitment and retention.	paul hrdlick <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 Feb 2002 17:57:57 -0500	76 lines
Re: strategies for recruitment and retention.	Kelly Estes <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 16 Feb 2002 10:43:37 EST	22 lines
Re: strategies for recruitment and retention.	Connie Mccoy <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 16 Feb 2002 13:14:50 -0500	59 lines
Re: strategies for recruitment and retention.	Diana Ross, RT, RDMS <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 16 Feb 2002 22:40:46 -0800	144 lines
Re: TCCD and TCD	Dhanjil, Surinder <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:29:47 -0000	86 lines
Re: TCCD and TCD	Rosendahl, Thomas, RN <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:42:41 -0800	57 lines
Re: TCCD and TCD	udaya kumar <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 17 Feb 2002 11:40:08 +0530	74 lines
Re: TCCD and TCD	Rosendahl, Thomas, RN <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 18 Feb 2002 09:31:07 -0800	110 lines
Re: TCCD and TCD	Don Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 18 Feb 2002 21:12:08 -0800	48 lines
Re: TCCD and TCD	udaya kumar <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 27 Feb 2002 05:55:13 +0530	56 lines
Terason price	fazeel <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 02:08:31 +0500	68 lines
Re: Terason price	Brian Hembling <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 16:59:21 -0600	79 lines
Re: Terason price	fazeel <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 7 Feb 2002 22:24:45 +0500	17 lines
Re: testing for venous insuffieciency	L. Greene <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 20:03:05 EST	14 lines
Re: testing for venous insuffieciency	Hodge, Megan D. <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:00:25 -0600	33 lines
Re: trackballs on the ATL machines	O'Brien, Carmen <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 07:44:27 -0800	117 lines
Training	Phil White <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 15:02:56 -0500	86 lines
Re: Training	Diana Ross, RT, RDMS <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 02:09:24 -0800	60 lines
UDS	Joan P Baker <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 10:57:29 -0800	58 lines
Ulrasound Diagnostic Schools...	Sound Diagnosis <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 1 Feb 2002 21:50:49 -0500	18 lines
Re: Ulrasound Diagnostic Schools...	Don Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 20:56:45 -0800	41 lines
Re: Ulrasound Diagnostic Schools...	Diana Ross, RT, RDMS <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 01:50:54 -0800	69 lines
ultrasound education	Hodge, Megan D. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:00:51 -0600	36 lines
Re: ultrasound practitioner program(s)	priscilla hart <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 7 Feb 2002 11:10:22 -0500	23 lines
Re: ultrasound practitioner program(s)	Audrey Fleming <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 8 Feb 2002 22:19:33 EST	74 lines
Re: ultrasound practitioner program(s)	Nathan Hoog <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 10 Feb 2002 16:22:27 EST	35 lines
Re: ultrasound practitioner program(s)	Audrey Fleming <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 10 Feb 2002 16:56:34 EST	51 lines
Re: ultrasound practitioner program(s)	Joan P Baker <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 10 Feb 2002 14:27:20 -0800	112 lines
Re: ultrasound practitioner program(s)	priscilla hart <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:20:33 -0500	41 lines
unsubcribe (temporary)	W. Smith <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:00:12 -0800	16 lines
Re: unsubcribe (temporary)	Knight, Steven J. <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 16 Feb 2002 13:12:10 -0500	28 lines
unsubscibe	Michael Varlotta MBA,RVT <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 16 Feb 2002 13:32:01 EST	24 lines
Unsubscribe	Laura Perrotta <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:14:54 -0500	50 lines
unsubscribe	Ona O'Keefe <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 17 Feb 2002 05:43:07 -0800	20 lines
Re: unsubscribe	Restrepo Luz <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 18 Feb 2002 07:45:40 -0600	31 lines
Warning: Poster child for education response	Johnson, Bonnie L. <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 1 Feb 2002 18:56:55 -0800	82 lines
Re: Warning: Poster child for education response	Mike Rush <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 2 Feb 2002 11:31:24 EST	35 lines
Re: Warning: Poster child for education response	stacey guillory <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 2 Feb 2002 09:55:41 -0800	29 lines
Re: Warning: Poster child for education response	Kathy Palmieri <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 2 Feb 2002 17:14:07 EST	92 lines
Re: Warning: Poster child for education response	Joan P Baker <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 2 Feb 2002 15:04:19 -0800	103 lines
Re: Warning: Poster child for education response	Shelly Burns <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 3 Feb 2002 17:02:17 EST	49 lines
Re: Warning: Poster child for education response	Hodge, Megan D. <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 08:21:25 -0600	109 lines
Re: Warning: Poster child for education response	Kathy Cooper <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 4 Feb 2002 18:48:58 EST	22 lines
Re: Warning: Poster child for education response	Zwakenberg Terry <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 7 Feb 2002 07:59:11 -0600	158 lines

Search Archives

Advanced Options

Options

		Log In
		Get Password

		Search Archives

		Subscribe or Unsubscribe

UVMFLOWNET Archives

February 2002

Subject

From

Date

Size

Search Archives

Options

Archives