<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.atomenabled.org/css/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

<icon>http://www.lsoft.com/images/listserv-community.gif</icon>
<logo>http://www.lsoft.com/images/listserv_small.gif</logo>
<link rel="related" href="http://www.lsoft.com/products/listserv-powered.asp" title="Powered by L-Soft's LISTSERV mailing list manager"/>

<title>SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE List</title>
<subtitle>SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE List Archives</subtitle>
<link rel="alternate" href="http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE"/>
<link rel="self" href="http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&amp;L=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE&amp;v=ATOM1.0"/>
<id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&amp;L=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE&amp;v=ATOM1.0</id>
<div class="info" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">This is an Atom formatted XML site feed. It is intended to be viewed in a Newsreader.
Alternatively you can view the HTML archives at http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE.
</div>
<generator uri="/cgi-bin/wa?DEBUG-SHOW-VERSION">LISTSERV Web Interface 2.4.1</generator>
<updated>2013-06-16T17:12:17Z</updated>


<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;662fff70.1306' title='Re: Japan Withdraws Cervical Cancer Vaccination Recommendations '/>
  <author>
     <name>Carrol Cox</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-16T12:12:07-05:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-16T12:12:07-05:00</updated>
  <title>Re: Japan Withdraws Cervical Cancer Vaccination Recommendations </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;662fff70.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>What are we supposed to conclude from the &quot;note that&quot; construction below?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Carrol&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&gt; -----Original Message-----&lt;br&gt;&gt; From: Science for the People Discussion List [mailto:SCIENCE-FOR-THE-&lt;br&gt;&gt; PEOPLE@list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of Jim West&lt;br&gt;&gt; Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2013 7:27 AM&lt;br&gt;&gt; To: SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU&lt;br&gt;&gt; Subject: Japan Withdraws Cervical Cancer Vaccination Recommendations&lt;br&gt;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&gt; &quot;The health ministry has issued a nationwide notice that cervical cancer&lt;br&gt;&gt; vaccinations should no longer be recommended for girls aged 12 to 16&lt;br&gt;&gt; because several adverse reactions to the medicines have been reported.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&gt; http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/06/15/national/cervix-vaccine-&lt;br&gt;&gt; issues-trigger-health-notice&lt;br&gt;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&gt; Note that this occurred [...]</content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;fd9fb11.1306' title='Japan Withdraws Cervical Cancer Vaccination Recommendations '/>
  <author>
     <name>Jim West</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-16T08:27:15-04:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-16T08:27:15-04:00</updated>
  <title>Japan Withdraws Cervical Cancer Vaccination Recommendations </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;fd9fb11.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>&quot;The health ministry has issued a nationwide notice that cervical cancer vaccinations should no longer be recommended for girls aged 12 to 16 because several adverse reactions to the medicines have been reported.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/06/15/national/cervix-vaccine-issues-trigger-health-notice&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note that this occurred despite tremendous influence by pharmaceutical industry. This occurred despite a clear conflict of interest over liability concerns for doctors who might otherwise report &quot;side effects&quot; related to vaccines. [...]</content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;69e92b78.1306' title='Human genes cannot be patented, court rules '/>
  <author>
     <name>Mitchel Cohen</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-13T16:11:42-04:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-13T16:11:42-04:00</updated>
  <title>Human genes cannot be patented, court rules </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;69e92b78.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>Gene patents: Supreme Court says extracted human DNA can&apos;t be patented&lt;br&gt;http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-gene-patents-20130613,0,1509412.story&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WASHINGTON&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday ruled partially for Myriad Genetics&lt;br&gt;Inc on the closely watched issue of whether human genes can be patented,&lt;br&gt;deciding synthetically produced genetic material can be patented but&lt;br&gt;naturally occurring DNA cannot.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The nine justices ruled unanimously in the case. The biotechnology&lt;br&gt;industry had warned that an expansive ruling against Myriad could&lt;br&gt;threaten billions of dollars of investment. [...] </content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;4e9338d8.1306' title='European Commission ban on bee-killing pesticides likely a scam '/>
  <author>
     <name>Maggie Zhou</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-12T19:37:24-07:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-12T19:37:24-07:00</updated>
  <title>European Commission ban on bee-killing pesticides likely a scam </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;4e9338d8.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>Turns out, that &quot;ban&quot; by the European Commission appears to be a scam thought out by the agrochimical firms themselves.  I paste below an email from pollinis.org that explains why - it also includes a link to a petition.  Also, the campaign &quot;Bee The Change&quot; has sent out a similar call for signing this petition: http://www.causes.com/actions/1754224-european-update?recruiter_id=21851030&amp;utm_campaign=activity_mailer%2Fnew_activity&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=causes&amp;token=S5agZ1PJQ3xBaMRyboBuyHJX Bottom line is that we're screwed if we believe that calls for &quot;regulation&quot; by the capitalist controlled governments will really result in sufficient protection for our only planet. Here is the email from pollinis.org with a good explanation: __________________________________________________ BEWARE ! The alleged ban on neonicotinoids announced by the [...]</content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;5d73ef0.1306' title='PRISM program was found unconstitutional, but opinion kept/remains secret '/>
  <author>
     <name>Maggie Zhou</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-12T19:36:06-07:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-12T19:36:06-07:00</updated>
  <title>PRISM program was found unconstitutional, but opinion kept/remains secret </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;5d73ef0.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>via Kevin Zeese on Facebook: &quot;So the FISA court seems to have found that PRISM program was unconstitutional but the decision was kept secret and it seems the Obama administration just went ahead with the program anyway. . .&quot; https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/06/government-says-secret-court-opinion-law-underlying-prism-program-needs-stay In a rare public filing in the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), the Justice Department today urged continued secrecy for a 2011 FISC opinion that found the National Security Agency's surveillance under the FISA Amendments Act to be unconstitutional. Significantly, the surveillance at issue was carried out under the same controversial legal authority tha</content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;1d244158.1306' title='Fw: kickstarter moves next to release of &apos;roboroach&apos; - the world&apos;s first commercially available cyborg..i kid you not... '/>
  <author>
     <name>Maggie Zhou</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-12T19:35:07-07:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-12T19:35:07-07:00</updated>
  <title>Fw: kickstarter moves next to release of &apos;roboroach&apos; - the world&apos;s first commercially available cyborg..i kid you not... </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;1d244158.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>See below a project description on kickstarter, followed by Jim Thomas' article critiquing it.  On the top of the thread is my comments. Maggie ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Maggie Zhou &lt;mzhou_us@yahoo.com&gt; To: jim thomas &lt;jim@etcgroup.org&gt;; &quot;SynBioCritics@lists.handsoffmotherearth.org&quot; &lt;synbiocritics@lists.handsoffmotherearth.org&gt; Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 10:28 PM Subject: Re: [SynbioCritics] kickstarter moves next to release of 'roboroach' - he world's first commercially available cyborg..i kid you not... While the animal experiment ethics angle is a worthy one, on cockroaches I don't think you'll generate a lot of public sympathy, especially against the claim of stimulating the love of science and for education. [...]</content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;ad663c0c.1306' title='Fw: [EcoRev] Mike Adams&apos; challenge ... '/>
  <author>
     <name>Maggie Zhou</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-05T05:39:42-07:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-05T05:39:42-07:00</updated>
  <title>Fw: [EcoRev] Mike Adams&apos; challenge ... </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;ad663c0c.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>i didn't read through all replies to this thread, and only briefly scanned Adam's article.  below I give some brief clarification, in case they haven't been answered yet. btw, Adam's article already has hundreds of comments on it.  Unless someone has his personal email, or publishes a rebuttal that gets widely read elsewhere, is it really worth the time? Anyway, on some of the issues raised: - re: the CO2 being &quot;tiny percentage&quot; vs. huge water vapor argument:  a) Water vapor only has a residence time of around 9 days in the atmosphere, so it acts primarily as an amplifier [...]</content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;2602ae08.1306' title='Re: Mike Adams&apos; challenge ... '/>
  <author>
     <name>Michael H Goldhaber</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-04T23:12:11-07:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-04T23:12:11-07:00</updated>
  <title>Re: Mike Adams&apos; challenge ... </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;2602ae08.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>Mitchell,&lt;br&gt;Young people have had many opportunities to hear about global warming whether in school, through the media, on Facebook, etc. many young people are very avid campaigners on this subject. Lots of those in occupy are among them.&lt;br&gt;You yourself have no excuse not to have made the effort to understand the key points well enough to explain them to anyone who cares. If you haven't you should at least know books, etc., that make the case.&lt;br&gt;The ones who decide to take Adams seriously may well not be idiots, but they have to be trying very hard not [...]</content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;455220bc.1306' title='Re: Mike Adams&apos; challenge ... '/>
  <author>
     <name>Mitchel Cohen</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-05T00:36:43-04:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-05T00:36:43-04:00</updated>
  <title>Re: Mike Adams&apos; challenge ... </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;455220bc.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>At 11:43 PM 6/4/2013, Michael H Goldhaber wrote:&lt;br&gt;&gt;Mitchell,&lt;br&gt;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&gt;Chandler was referring to the fact that without&lt;br&gt;&gt;presenting any evidence whatsoever, Mike Adams&lt;br&gt;&gt;calls global warming a hoax and a lie. Instead&lt;br&gt;&gt;he makes the totally obvious point that plants&lt;br&gt;&gt;need CO2 and that CO2 isn&apos;t (directly) harmful&lt;br&gt;&gt;to humans at 400ppm. He simply ignores the&lt;br&gt;&gt;greenhouse effect and just makes up that the&lt;br&gt;&gt;recent rise in atmospheric CO2 comes from&lt;br&gt;&gt;natural sources. Anyone who takes what he says&lt;br&gt;&gt;seriously simply ignores what atmospheric&lt;br&gt;&gt;scientists and popularizers like Gore have been&lt;br&gt;&gt;clearly demonstrating for years.&lt;br&gt;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&gt;Chandler&apos;s point I [...] </content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;fab57b31.1306' title='Re: Mike Adams&apos; challenge ... '/>
  <author>
     <name>Michael H Goldhaber</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-04T20:43:51-07:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-04T20:43:51-07:00</updated>
  <title>Re: Mike Adams&apos; challenge ... </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;fab57b31.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>Mitchell,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chandler was referring to the fact that without presenting any evidence whatsoever, Mike Adams calls global warming a hoax and a lie. Instead he makes the totally obvious point that plants need CO2 and that CO2 isn&apos;t (directly) harmful to humans at 400ppm. He simply ignores the greenhouse effect and just makes up that the recent rise in atmospheric CO2 comes from natural sources. Anyone who takes what he says seriously simply ignores what atmospheric scientists and popularizers like Gore have been clearly demonstrating for years. [...] </content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;da83ec7c.1306' title='Re: Mike Adams&apos; challenge ... '/>
  <author>
     <name>David Schwartzman</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-04T17:20:36-04:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-04T17:20:36-04:00</updated>
  <title>Re: Mike Adams&apos; challenge ... </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;da83ec7c.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>Here is a slide from my powerpoints I commonly use that at least addresses&lt;br&gt;Mike Adams&apos; claim &quot; In fact, there is hardly any link between energy usage&lt;br&gt;and the rise of CO2 in the atmosphere. The vast majority of CO2 emissions&lt;br&gt;come from biology, not burning fossil fuels.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First it is correct to say &quot;The vast majority of CO2 emissions come from&lt;br&gt;biology, not burning fossil fuels.&quot; The flux of CO2 from respiration/decay&lt;br&gt;is on the order of 120 Peta gC/year compared to the anthropopenic flux on&lt;br&gt;the order of 10 Peta gC/year, *but* the biologic flux is almost [...] </content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;ea6f376f.1306' title='Re: Mike Adams&apos; challenge ... '/>
  <author>
     <name>Mitchel Cohen</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-04T16:20:11-04:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-04T16:20:11-04:00</updated>
  <title>Re: Mike Adams&apos; challenge ... </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;ea6f376f.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>Sorry Chandler,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you want to influence the people who read Mike&lt;br&gt;Adams&apos; columns -- and a lot of them are ecology&lt;br&gt;activists, not right-wingers per se -- we&apos;d be&lt;br&gt;best to do what Science-for-the-People has&lt;br&gt;apparently stopped doing, and that is to spread&lt;br&gt;carefully phrased and respectful comments SHOWING where the argument is wrong.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What exactly is a lie, in the column? What he&apos;s&lt;br&gt;saying is true insofar as the planet&apos;s carbon&lt;br&gt;dioxide levels WERE in 7,000 ppm range 500 million years ago. [...] </content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;6ff13a75.1306' title='Bay Area, CA: Stuart Newman to speak in Berkeley '/>
  <author>
     <name>Mitchel Cohen</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-04T14:58:30-04:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-04T14:58:30-04:00</updated>
  <title>Bay Area, CA: Stuart Newman to speak in Berkeley </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;6ff13a75.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>Hi,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please try to attend this on Thursday in Berkeley at 7:30-9:30 pm,&lt;br&gt;David Brower Center, 2150 Allston Way&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FREE&lt;br&gt;-- should be a very interesting scientific journey -- and say hi to&lt;br&gt;Stuart Newman for me ....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The event is described here:&lt;br&gt;http://www.synbiowatch.org/2013/05/about-june-6-event-with-milton-reynolds-stuart-newman-the-rise-of-genetically-modified-humans/.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stuart will also be interviewed on Thursday morning by C.S. Soong for&lt;br&gt;&quot;Against the Grain&quot; on KPFA. [...] </content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;70ab7183.1306' title='Re: Mike Adams&apos; challenge ... '/>
  <author>
     <name>Chandler Davis</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-04T12:20:35-04:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-04T12:20:35-04:00</updated>
  <title>Re: Mike Adams&apos; challenge ... </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;70ab7183.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>Mitchel, I am appalled at the thought that this anti-science&lt;br&gt;rant could be described as &quot;increadingly influential in our&lt;br&gt;movements.&quot; Really? What are these movements you describe&lt;br&gt;as OURS? If you want to explain the greenhouse effect to&lt;br&gt;Mike Adams, do, but you can start by quoting James Hansen,&lt;br&gt;and he will just tell you to &quot;stop believing these lies.&quot;&lt;br&gt;Chandler [...]</content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;8f7d2752.1306' title='Re: Mike Adams&apos; challenge ... '/>
  <author>
     <name>Mandi Kraft</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-04T15:52:07+02:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-04T15:52:07+02:00</updated>
  <title>Re: Mike Adams&apos; challenge ... </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;8f7d2752.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>You might be interested in the paper at this address, Mitchell. http://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/effects-of-rising-atmospheric-concentrations-of-carbon-13254108&lt;br&gt;Extra CO2 does seem to suit some plants, but some important crops don’t like more of it (maize being one). And since everything around us has basically evolved to live in a certain CO2 range,I would worry abut unanticipated consequences down the line even in plants that do seem to like it.&lt;br&gt;References to a lush, tropical world when CO2 was much higher sound nice, but don’t consider how much of the life we live is dependent on just this range of atmospheric CO2. So in the oceans, [...]</content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;a81176ff.1306' title='Mike Adams&apos; challenge ... '/>
  <author>
     <name>Mitchel Cohen</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-04T06:36:29-04:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-04T06:36:29-04:00</updated>
  <title>Mike Adams&apos; challenge ... </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;a81176ff.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>http://www.MitchelCohen.com&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mitchel Cohen&apos;s book, &quot;What Is Direct Action? Lessons from (and to)&lt;br&gt;Occupy Wall Street&quot; (foreword by Richard Wolff) (596 pages) is now&lt;br&gt;available at:&lt;br&gt;http://www.lulu.com/shop/mitchel-cohen/what-is-direct-action/paperback/product-20937425.html&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ring the bells that still can ring, Forget your perfect offering.&lt;br&gt;There is a crack, a crack in everything, That&apos;s how the light gets in.&lt;br&gt;~ Leonard Cohen&lt;br&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-vSfwIJkjY </content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;8397d7f4.1306' title='Vinegar cancer test saves lives, India study finds '/>
  <author>
     <name>S. E. Anderson</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-03T12:23:44-04:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-03T12:23:44-04:00</updated>
  <title>Vinegar cancer test saves lives, India study finds </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;8397d7f4.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>Full message available at: &lt;a href="http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;8397d7f4.1306"&gt;Vinegar cancer test saves lives, India study finds &lt;/a&gt;</content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;1e4b3fd6.1306' title='Re: GMOs in Cuba? Debate .... '/>
  <author>
     <name>Kamran Nayeri</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-02T10:01:57-07:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-02T10:01:57-07:00</updated>
  <title>Re: GMOs in Cuba? Debate .... </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;1e4b3fd6.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>Mitchel:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I found a copy of my review of Sustainable Agriculture and&lt;br&gt;Resistance&lt;http://www.greenpraxis.org/Documents/Cuba%20Sustainable%20Agricuture.PDF&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kamran&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Kamran Nayeri &lt;kamran.nayeri@gmail.com&gt;wrote:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&gt; Mitchel:&lt;br&gt;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&gt; In case you have not read these...Here is a couple of articles.&lt;br&gt;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&gt; The Paradox of Cuban Agriculture &lt;http://forhumanliberation.blogspot.com/2012/01/660-paradox-of-cuban-agriculture.html&gt; by&lt;br&gt;&gt; Miguel Altieri (an international leader in agroecology) and Fenando Funes&lt;br&gt;&gt; (son of the author of the article you posted below). The Funes family is&lt;br&gt;&gt; part of the academic leaders of agroecology in Cuba. You might want to talk&lt;br&gt;&gt; to them when you are in Cuba. [...] </content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;87d90481.1306' title='Re: GMOs in Cuba? Debate .... '/>
  <author>
     <name>Kamran Nayeri</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-02T09:47:30-07:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-02T09:47:30-07:00</updated>
  <title>Re: GMOs in Cuba? Debate .... </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;87d90481.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>Mitchel:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In case you have not read these...Here is a couple of articles.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Paradox of Cuban Agriculture&lt;br&gt;&lt;http://forhumanliberation.blogspot.com/2012/01/660-paradox-of-cuban-agriculture.html&gt;&lt;br&gt;by&lt;br&gt;Miguel Altieri (an international leader in agroecology) and Fenando Funes&lt;br&gt;(son of the author of the article you posted below). The Funes family is&lt;br&gt;part of the academic leaders of agroecology in Cuba. You might want to talk&lt;br&gt;to them when you are in Cuba. We can learn a lot from them, I think. [...] </content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;2f4ac099.1306' title='GMOs in Cuba? Debate .... '/>
  <author>
     <name>Mitchel Cohen</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-02T10:55:20-04:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-02T10:55:20-04:00</updated>
  <title>GMOs in Cuba? Debate .... </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;2f4ac099.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>http://www.MitchelCohen.com&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mitchel Cohen&apos;s book, &quot;What Is Direct Action? Lessons from (and to)&lt;br&gt;Occupy Wall Street&quot; (foreword by Richard Wolff) (596 pages) is now&lt;br&gt;available at:&lt;br&gt;http://www.lulu.com/shop/mitchel-cohen/what-is-direct-action/paperback/product-20937425.html&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ring the bells that still can ring, Forget your perfect offering.&lt;br&gt;There is a crack, a crack in everything, That&apos;s how the light gets in.&lt;br&gt;~ Leonard Cohen&lt;br&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-vSfwIJkjY </content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;9382929e.1306' title='Formula: Protesters (incl. env)=Terrorists=Radicals/Fundamentalists=Mentally ill=Needs curing '/>
  <author>
     <name>Maggie Zhou</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-01T22:34:13-07:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-01T22:34:13-07:00</updated>
  <title>Formula: Protesters (incl. env)=Terrorists=Radicals/Fundamentalists=Mentally ill=Needs curing </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;9382929e.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>Like anthropology and most other fields of research, neuroscience has been intensely exploited (and funded) by the military-industrial-terror mafia. Religious Fundamentalism 'May Be Categorised As Mental Illness &amp; Cured By Science' &gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/05/30/religious-fundamentalism-categorised-mental-illness-cured-_n_3359267.html?utm_hp_ref=uk&amp;just_reloaded=1#comments &gt;Kathleen Taylor ... says strong negative beliefs could be eradicated using techniques already in the works. &gt;&quot;the ability to get data from living brains is a holy grail for many interested parties other than neuroscientists and doctors.” http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/30/leading-neuroscientist-religious-fundamentalism-may-be-a-mental-illness-that-can-be-cured/ &gt;A leading neurologist at the University of Oxford said this week ...... “One of the surprises may be to see people with certain beliefs as people who can be treated,” she explained, according to The Times of London. [...]</content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;a967960a.1306' title='Worse than fracking? California environmentalists terrified by acid jobs '/>
  <author>
     <name>Maggie Zhou</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-01T21:08:34-07:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-01T21:08:34-07:00</updated>
  <title>Worse than fracking? California environmentalists terrified by acid jobs </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;a967960a.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>You want to ban fracking?  They switch to using deadly acid instead...  Capitalism is a system where seeking profit can not be stopped, unless capitalism is terminated. Worse than fracking? California environmentalists terrified by acid jobs http://rt.com/usa/california-fracking-rules-debate-895/ As California lawmakers discuss 10 bills that would regulate fracking, some environmentalists are warning that the debate overshadows a more serious process that involves the use of hydrofluoric acid. </content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;4ba4e60d.1306' title='What&apos;s behind B.C. rejection of Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline proposal '/>
  <author>
     <name>Maggie Zhou</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-01T20:57:21-07:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-01T20:57:21-07:00</updated>
  <title>What&apos;s behind B.C. rejection of Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline proposal </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;4ba4e60d.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>According to Canadian anti-tar sands activist Macdonald Nopacifictrails Stainsby, British Columbia's premier Christy Clark promotes fracking and ramping up Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), which will look better and more &quot;rational&quot; by rejecting this Enbridge pipeline.  So this decision comes as neither a surprise, nor a true &quot;victory&quot;.  Below is one of his Facebook posts: https://www.facebook.com/mstainsby?hc_location=stream Macdonald Nopacifictrails Stainsby Let's talk honestly about the BC government entering a &quot;no&quot; as per the JRP review of the Enbridge Gateway Pipeline. It's being done because most BC residents oppose the line (and don't know enough about the other lines because of a singular focus on Enbridge from too [...]</content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;f333386f.1306' title='Resistance in U.S. military to the Gulf War '/>
  <author>
     <name>Mitchel Cohen</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-01T18:01:04-04:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-01T18:01:04-04:00</updated>
  <title>Resistance in U.S. military to the Gulf War </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;f333386f.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>With the trial of heroic Bradley Manning about to start this coming&lt;br&gt;week, I take a look at something few remember: the resistance by&lt;br&gt;young soldiers in the military to the Gulf War.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FOR EACH &amp; EVERY WARRIOR WHOSE STRENGTH IS NOT TO FIGHT | Mitchel Cohen&lt;br&gt;www.mitchelcohen.com&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The story of the widespread (and, today, hard to believe) resistance&lt;br&gt;of working class kids in the U.S. military to the 1991 Gulf War and&lt;br&gt;lessons learned (hopefully) by the antiwar movement. [...] </content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;2d6fa382.1306' title='Autism 1:50 in U.S. '/>
  <author>
     <name>Jim West</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-01T12:09:07-04:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-01T12:09:07-04:00</updated>
  <title>Autism 1:50 in U.S. </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;2d6fa382.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>Autism Prevalence: Can It Be 1 in 50?&lt;br&gt;http://www.autismspeaks.org/blog/2013/04/10/autism-prevalence-can-it-be-1-50&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[My comment:]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Additionally, see Ang et al, which shows ultrasound to be a primary stressor, disrupting fetal neurons.&lt;br&gt;http://www.pnas.org/content/103/34/12903.full.pdf&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everyone agrees ultrasound is very dangerous, yet FDA does regulate exposure. That responsibility is given to the sonographer. Yet nearly all sonographers do not understand the safety features of their machines.&lt;br&gt;http://contemporaryobgyn.modernmedicine.com/contemporary-obgyn/news/modernmedicine/modern-medicine-now/fetal-ultrasound-how-put-safety-first [...]</content>
</entry>

<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
  <link rel='alternate' href='http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;9f15874e.1306' title='Knowledge, Climate, Energy and Ecosocialist Transition in the 21st Century at the Left Forum '/>
  <author>
     <name>David Schwartzman</name>
  </author>
  <published>2013-06-01T10:18:04-04:00</published>
  <updated>2013-06-01T10:18:04-04:00</updated>
  <title>Knowledge, Climate, Energy and Ecosocialist Transition in the 21st Century at the Left Forum </title>
  <id>http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE;9f15874e.1306</id>
  <content type='html'>*DC Metro Science for the People www.dcmetroSFTP.org*&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;*Invitation to discussion on*&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;*Knowledge, Climate, Energy and Ecosocialist Transition in the 21st Century*&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;*At **Pace University, New York City***&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;*Room: E322, Time: Sunday, June 9, 10:00am-11:50am*&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* *&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;*Abstract: *Yes, global biodiversity and humankind are indeed in peril from&lt;br&gt;the threat of catastrophic climate change (C3). But this threat is also an&lt;br&gt;immense, unprecedented opportunity to end the rule of capital on this&lt;br&gt;planet. Rapid replacement of fossil fuels (starting with coal and&lt;br&gt;non‐conventional petroleum such as tar sands) with wind and solar energy&lt;br&gt;resources must be part of an effective prevention [...]</content>
</entry>

</feed>
