Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - FARMCOLLIE Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

FARMCOLLIE Archives

July 2005

FARMCOLLIE@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
FARMCOLLIE Home FARMCOLLIE Home
FARMCOLLIE July 2005

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: cow hocks
From:
Rini <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Farm Collie Breed Conservancy and Restoration <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Jul 2005 12:32:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
>
> I'm curious, does anyone know what would make cow hocks a structural fault
> for a horse but not a dog?

   I don't know the numbers on this, but horses have enormous amounts of
weight on very small hooves.  The lower legs, like other animals that depend
on speed to escape predators, are slim and mostly tendons and bone.  The
muscle is mostly higher up on the leg and body.   So we're talking physics -
the math of mass and angles that have lots of pressure and torque on them.
Think of a horse's leg as a lever, and put a crimp in it.  Suddenly it's not
so strong.
  Doesn't take much to get a hitch in their git-along, as they say.
  A dog weighs a lot less (if they weighed 800-1600 pounds, it might be a
different story) and has bigger bones proportionally and and can tolerate
more torque when they turn and dig in for speed.  A fall of a more flexible
50# body going down 12 inches is different than the fall of a more rigid
1200# body going down 4 feet.

Rini

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV