I am enjoying this discussion and am learning. This is one of the reasons
that I stay on this email list. What is Dr Green's study? What other
research is being done and where can information be obtained. Keep up the
good discussion and do not change your minds easily.
Your friend because of Dogs.
>From: Kathi Tesarz <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: Farm Collie Breed Conservancy and Restoration
><[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: intro and puppies
>Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 19:02:00 -0700
> > >Neither dog has been x-rayed. Judah is only a year and x-rays
> > >would not show much at this point unless he had a serious hip
> > >problem. We feel confident this is not the case just by watching
> > >his movements and range of motion. Ellie has no apparent problem
> > >with movement and no history of hip problems in her background.
>There is no way to tell if a dog has CHD by movement alone. If you could
>tell by movement Vets would not be doing x-rays. I have two dogs with CHD,
>neither of them could have been identified by movement at less than 4 years
> > >I am not entirely convinced that any benefits of OFA certification
> > >would out weigh the potential harm of the x-rays themselves (radiation
> > >directed at the dogs reproductive organs as well as the anesthesia).
> > >In researching CHD, I've discovered that environmental factors (diet,
> > >excercise etc...) play just as much if not more of a role in the
> > >manifestation of the disease.
>Environment and diet can play a role in a dog already pre-disposed to CHD
>can't cause CHD.
> > >CHD does not always result in
> > >degeneration of the joint. How does the OFA explain why some dogs
> > >with fair or even poor ratings never show clinical symptoms?
>There are many reasons for this in dogs rated fair. I have never heard of
>dog rated poor having NO clinical symptoms throughout it's entire life.
>Some of the condition for a dog rated fair:
>1. the physical condition of the dog,
>2. the kind of chd, there are more than one problem within the hip
>it's self to cause problems.
> > >There
> > >are so many unknowns as far as the heritability and the genetics of
> > >it. My concern with OFA certification is that by using this as a bench
> > >mark of sound dogs and culling those dogs that do not measure up
> > >that we are losing genetic diversity and opening up the door to many
> > >more problems and diseases within the different breeds.
>There is a big difference between breeding a dog with known CHD in it's
>background and not even checking for CHD. IF through careful research I
>determine that my dog has valuable genetic diversity, limited CHD in it's
>lines, and is rated fair from OFA I could buy this argument.
> > >There is alot of controversy over this subject and arguments can be
> > >made for both sides. My postition may be a bit unconventional but
> > >I just don't see the iron clad evidence in favor of going the OFA
>Yes there is allot of controversy I also believe that we should all enter
>this will both eyes wide open. I encourage anyone with English Shepherds
>to send blood samples to Dr Green's study. Through research like his we
>will hopefully find the cause of this awful problem.
>[log in to unmask]
>The higher the structure the deeper the foundation. St Augustine
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com