LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for FARMCOLLIE Archives


FARMCOLLIE Archives

FARMCOLLIE Archives


FARMCOLLIE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FARMCOLLIE Home

FARMCOLLIE Home

FARMCOLLIE  July 2008

FARMCOLLIE July 2008

Subject:

Re: FARMCOLLIE Digest - 7 Jul 2008 to 9 Jul 2008 (#2008-82)

From:

Bonnie <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:48:47 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (112 lines)

Hi Laura,
I wanted to write, but I have a question. Would this effect puppy mills and
pet brokerages?  Personally, the biggest problem I see with mandatory
sterilization is the loss of well bred cats and dogs to puppy mills, as
there will always be the want/need for puppies....so I do not see the
retail/wholesale business declining. It has only increased. If there is a
market for puppies, those puppies would be better off born into good homes
vs. mills, of course. That goes without saying for working dogs (S&R, police
dogs, service dogs, etc).

Can you explain this bill in a little more detail? Certainly California is
not thinking of banning all sales of puppies---or are they? As that would be
part of a mandate, I would think, if all dogs need to be sterilized.

I want to write a coherent letter, of my own, so this bill does not have far
reaching consequences for many states. But I am confused.

Bonnie Hess
Faithful Companion Dog Training,LLC
WWW.Faithful-companion.com
also see:
WWW.Trulydogfriendly.com
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Farm Collie Breed Conservancy and Restoration
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of FARMCOLLIE automatic digest
system
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:11 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: FARMCOLLIE Digest - 7 Jul 2008 to 9 Jul 2008 (#2008-82)

There is 1 message totalling 71 lines in this issue.

Topics of the day:

  1. AB 1634 update

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:    Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:41:46 -0700
From:    Laura Sanborn <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: AB 1634 update

-- Permission to cross post granted --

California AB 1634 was "gut amended" 3 weeks ago into a different bill from 
the one that passed the state Assembly last year.  Rather than a broad 
sterilization mandate on all owned dogs and cats, with limited specified 
exceptions, the bill now targets dogs and cats who are subject to 
"complaints" and impoundments for other reasons.  On the third such 
infraction, a dog would need to be sterilized.   On the surface, this makes 
the bill acceptable, focusing on irresponsible pet owners and leaving the 
rest of us alone.  The devil is in the details though, and unfortunately as 
written AB 1634 is not limited in this way.

In his testimony before the Senate Local Government Committee, 
Assemblymember Levine repeatedly compared what AB 1634 would do to a seat 
belt law in establishing a secondary offense.  Not wearing a seat belt is 
illegal, but one will not be cited for it unless stopped for another 
traffic infraction, the primary offense.   Just as the seat belt law made 
not wearing a seat belt illegal, AB 1634 makes owning an intact dog or cat 
illegal, no exceptions.

You might imagine that there is no problem with this, just keep your dog 
out of trouble with animal control, and AB 1634 won't be enforced against 
you.  Unfortunately, as Mr. Levine repeatedly stated in his testimony, the 
primary offense of a "complaint" against a dog or cat need not be valid or 
upheld to trigger penalties for the secondary offense.   The complaints 
could come from a malicious ex-spouse or neighbor.  The secondary offense 
penalties will also be triggered by impoundments subsequent to severe 
traffic accidents, natural disaster, or a contractor or cleaning service 
inadvertently allowing your dog to escape from your property.  Many of us 
suggested amendments to AB 1634 to insure that only irresponsible pet 
owners would be targeted, adding Constitutional due process protections 
lacking in the bill, but Mr. Levine ignored all suggestions.

AB 1634 passed the California Senate Local Government Comittee on June 25, 
by a party line vote.  It will be heard by the Senate Appropriations 
Committee on July 14, next Monday.  If it passes there, it will be voted on 
in the full California state Senate.  If it passes there, it would go on 
back to the Assembly for a concurrence vote and then on to the Governor.

Experience shows that only a massive letter writing campaign can slow this 
bill down.  We are asking all California dog and cat owners to write to the 
Senate Appropriations Committee and their state senator to oppose this 
bill    Compelling arguments, in and of themselves, have proven ineffective 
in a political environment poisoned by partisan politics.

The Appropriations Committee responds specifically to fiscal 
arguments.  With the state facing a $15 billion deficit, anything that 
increases spending may die in the Appropriations Committee at this 
time.  This is our best chance to stop this bill.

The easiest way for Californians to send AB 1634 opposition letters is with 
the NAIA's capwiz.  It only takes a few minutes.  The system is set up with 
text you can choose from, or your can write your own.  Your letter will be 
sent to all members of the Senate Appropriations Committee.
http://capwiz.com/naiatrust/issues/alert/?alertid=11576491&type=CT&show_aler
t=1

The letter that Save Our Dogs sent to the Senate Appropriations Committee 
is here.  It contains specific fiscal arguments.
http://saveourdogs.net/documents/SaveOurDogsSenateAppro.pdf

Laura Sanborn
http://saveourdogs.net/

------------------------------

End of FARMCOLLIE Digest - 7 Jul 2008 to 9 Jul 2008 (#2008-82)
**************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2021
November 2020
October 2020
March 2019
January 2019
October 2018
March 2018
April 2017
December 2016
November 2016
July 2016
December 2015
August 2015
February 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager