|
|
|
Size
|
"Cuba: An Ecological Pathway of Socialist Development" A Talk by Dick Levins
|
Sam Anderson |
Thu, 2 May 2002 07:05:09 -0700 |
1439 lines |
(no subject)
|
Joe Schwartz |
Thu, 9 May 2002 08:35:23 EDT |
24 lines |
Re: (no subject)
|
Ian Pitchford |
Thu, 9 May 2002 16:24:38 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: (no subject)
|
Louis Proyect |
Thu, 9 May 2002 11:44:29 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: (no subject)
|
Ivan Handler |
Thu, 9 May 2002 11:04:47 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: (no subject)
|
C Hammer |
Thu, 9 May 2002 12:58:18 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: (no subject)
|
Ivan Handler |
Thu, 9 May 2002 12:27:46 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: (no subject)
|
C Hammer |
Thu, 9 May 2002 14:39:52 -0400 |
13 lines |
Re: (no subject)
|
Louis Proyect |
Thu, 9 May 2002 14:52:02 -0400 |
34 lines |
|
J. Alper |
Thu, 23 May 2002 07:39:44 -0400 |
13 lines |
|
joseph schwartz |
Fri, 24 May 2002 18:01:23 +0100 |
15 lines |
A Guy Robinson article
|
Louis Proyect |
Mon, 13 May 2002 10:10:58 -0400 |
51 lines |
A review of Ullica Segerstrale's "Defenders of the Truth"
|
Louis Proyect |
Thu, 30 May 2002 08:41:05 -0400 |
160 lines |
Re: A review of Ullica Segerstrale's "Defenders of the Truth"
|
Richard Levins |
Fri, 31 May 2002 07:35:09 -0400 |
19 lines |
A scientist for the rest of us
|
Ian Pitchford |
Fri, 31 May 2002 20:16:12 +0100 |
37 lines |
ADMINISTRIVATA : Managing your subscription
|
Steve Cavrak |
Fri, 24 May 2002 14:22:08 -0400 |
24 lines |
Alas Poor Evolutionary Psychology: Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned
|
Ian Pitchford |
Thu, 9 May 2002 10:50:04 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Alas Poor Evolutionary Psychology: Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned
|
Ivan Handler |
Thu, 9 May 2002 10:17:07 -0500 |
81 lines |
Re: Alas Poor Evolutionary Psychology: Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
Joe Schwartz |
Fri, 10 May 2002 04:14:05 EDT |
55 lines |
Re: Alas Poor Evolutionary Psychology: Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
Maurice Bazin |
Fri, 10 May 2002 15:31:53 -0200 |
52 lines |
Re: Alas Poor Evolutionary Psychology: Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
M. B. Weissman |
Fri, 10 May 2002 14:40:22 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: Alas Poor Evolutionary Psychology: Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
Louis Proyect |
Fri, 10 May 2002 15:49:54 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: Alas Poor Evolutionary Psychology: Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
Joe Schwartz |
Fri, 10 May 2002 18:04:41 EDT |
45 lines |
Re: Alas Poor Evolutionary Psychology: Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
NEWMAN STUART |
Fri, 10 May 2002 18:16:46 -0400 |
131 lines |
Re: Alas Poor Evolutionary Psychology: Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
M. B. Weissman |
Fri, 10 May 2002 17:27:54 -0500 |
122 lines |
Re: Alas Poor Evolutionary Psychology: Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
NEWMAN STUART |
Fri, 10 May 2002 18:30:42 -0400 |
50 lines |
Re: Alas Poor Evolutionary Psychology: Unfairly Accused,Unjustly Condemned
|
Steve Cavrak |
Thu, 9 May 2002 11:30:31 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: Alas Poor Evolutionary Psychology: Unfairly Accused,Unjustly Condemned?
|
Michael H Goldhaber |
Sat, 11 May 2002 00:16:22 -0700 |
57 lines |
Re: Alas Poor Evolutionary Psychology: Unfairly Accused,Unjustly Condemned?
|
Joe Schwartz |
Sat, 11 May 2002 12:06:03 EDT |
30 lines |
Re: Alas Poor Evolutionary Psychology: Unfairly Accused,Unjustly Condemned?
|
Michael Weissman |
Sat, 11 May 2002 15:33:49 -0500 |
87 lines |
Alas Poor...
|
Iain Boal |
Fri, 10 May 2002 14:52:56 -0700 |
47 lines |
All cultures are not equal
|
Ian Pitchford |
Wed, 29 May 2002 19:49:30 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: All cultures are not equal
|
Louis Proyect |
Wed, 29 May 2002 14:52:35 -0400 |
43 lines |
Be clear; be concise; be respectful
|
Herb Fox |
Wed, 29 May 2002 17:28:56 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: Be clear; be concise; be respectful
|
John Landon |
Wed, 29 May 2002 18:09:19 EDT |
174 lines |
Re: Be clear; be concise; be respectful
|
Richard Leigh |
Wed, 29 May 2002 18:49:50 -0400 |
173 lines |
Re: Be clear; be concise; be respectful-- Is the Left respectful?
|
John Landon |
Thu, 30 May 2002 11:29:25 EDT |
86 lines |
Change of address
|
Joe Schwartz |
Wed, 15 May 2002 17:18:19 EDT |
24 lines |
Companions in Crime: A Biosocial Perspective
|
Ian Pitchford |
Thu, 9 May 2002 10:50:33 +0100 |
50 lines |
Cuban Cancer Research Scientists Banned from US Science Conference
|
Sam Anderson |
Tue, 21 May 2002 09:26:42 -0700 |
150 lines |
Dempski, design, and Darwin-Paley
|
John Landon |
Fri, 31 May 2002 17:41:47 EDT |
35 lines |
Digitizing Hollywood Control Over Culture & Information
|
Sam Anderson |
Sun, 26 May 2002 17:05:30 -0700 |
252 lines |
Eonix esoteric? Say goodbye to Marx and Darwin.
|
John Landon |
Tue, 28 May 2002 08:53:33 EDT |
166 lines |
Re: Eonix esoteric? Say goodbye to Marx and Darwin.
|
joseph schwartz |
Tue, 28 May 2002 15:21:01 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: Eonix esoteric? Say goodbye to Marx and Darwin.
|
John Landon |
Tue, 28 May 2002 11:30:24 EDT |
103 lines |
Re: Eonix esoteric? Say goodbye to Marx and Darwin.
|
Ivan Handler |
Tue, 28 May 2002 11:09:20 -0500 |
105 lines |
Re: Eonix esoteric? Say goodbye to Marx and Darwin.
|
John Landon |
Tue, 28 May 2002 12:41:02 EDT |
83 lines |
Re: Eonix esoteric? Say goodbye to Marx and Darwin.
|
John Landon |
Tue, 28 May 2002 12:56:13 EDT |
77 lines |
Re: EP etc
|
Ian Pitchford |
Thu, 9 May 2002 22:52:11 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: ev psych unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
Joe Schwartz |
Sun, 12 May 2002 18:44:00 EDT |
198 lines |
Re: ev psych unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
Michael Weissman |
Sun, 12 May 2002 22:27:29 -0500 |
103 lines |
Re: ev psych unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
Michael H Goldhaber |
Mon, 13 May 2002 00:44:02 -0700 |
63 lines |
Re: ev psych unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
NEWMAN STUART |
Mon, 13 May 2002 11:51:41 -0400 |
149 lines |
Fidel: Making Medicine Work for a Healthy People
|
Sam Anderson |
Tue, 21 May 2002 09:57:12 -0700 |
404 lines |
First Thesis of Feuerbach... And the Trojan Horse...
|
John Landon |
Thu, 30 May 2002 12:09:30 EDT |
66 lines |
Fukuyama and 'end of history'
|
John Landon |
Tue, 28 May 2002 19:15:45 EDT |
165 lines |
Gintis Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
Ian Pitchford |
Sun, 12 May 2002 06:46:45 +0100 |
80 lines |
Re: Gintis Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
Louis Proyect |
Sun, 12 May 2002 09:34:55 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: Gintis Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
Maurice Bazin |
Sun, 12 May 2002 19:31:08 -0200 |
44 lines |
Re: Gintis Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
Michael Weissman |
Sun, 12 May 2002 17:45:04 -0500 |
119 lines |
Re: Gintis Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
Iain Boal |
Sun, 12 May 2002 18:49:47 -0700 |
52 lines |
Gintis Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
NEWMAN STUART |
Sun, 12 May 2002 22:39:14 -0400 |
72 lines |
Re: Gintis Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
Joe Schwartz |
Mon, 13 May 2002 03:26:07 EDT |
51 lines |
Re: Gintis Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
Maurice Bazin |
Mon, 13 May 2002 10:21:30 -0200 |
119 lines |
Re: Gintis Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
M. B. Weissman |
Mon, 13 May 2002 11:57:58 -0500 |
255 lines |
Re: Gintis Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
Iain Boal |
Mon, 13 May 2002 11:41:43 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: Gintis Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
Joe Schwartz |
Mon, 13 May 2002 17:57:49 EDT |
48 lines |
Re: Gintis Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
Maurice Bazin |
Mon, 13 May 2002 21:15:40 -0200 |
158 lines |
Re: Gintis Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
Michael Weissman |
Mon, 13 May 2002 19:44:11 -0500 |
130 lines |
Re: Gintis Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
Joe Schwartz |
Tue, 14 May 2002 03:51:50 EDT |
75 lines |
Re: Gintis Unfairly Accused, Unjustly Condemned?
|
M. B. Weissman |
Tue, 14 May 2002 10:33:38 -0500 |
210 lines |
Gould Memorial
|
Phil Gasper |
Wed, 29 May 2002 08:37:22 -0700 |
53 lines |
Gould on progress--Achilles heel for a crypto_Darwinian fundamentalist?
|
John Landon |
Wed, 29 May 2002 08:21:35 EDT |
142 lines |
Gould Was a Scientist for the People
|
Phil Gasper |
Fri, 31 May 2002 09:33:09 -0700 |
179 lines |
Gould was a scientist for the people
|
George Salzman |
Fri, 31 May 2002 14:04:28 -0400 |
79 lines |
Re: Gould was a scientist for the people
|
Phil Gasper |
Fri, 31 May 2002 11:12:16 -0700 |
55 lines |
Re: Gould was a scientist for the people
|
Herb Fox |
Fri, 31 May 2002 15:11:27 -0400 |
119 lines |
Gould's Battle Against Racism
|
Phil Gasper |
Wed, 29 May 2002 10:14:21 -0700 |
246 lines |
Gould's legacy
|
NEWMAN STUART |
Mon, 27 May 2002 16:44:37 -0400 |
326 lines |
Re: Gould's legacy
|
Ivan Handler |
Mon, 27 May 2002 17:08:40 -0500 |
70 lines |
How to filter messages
|
Ivan Handler |
Thu, 30 May 2002 12:14:10 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: How to filter messages--
|
John Landon |
Fri, 31 May 2002 17:29:22 EDT |
152 lines |
Re: How to filter messages--
|
John Landon |
Fri, 31 May 2002 17:45:03 EDT |
57 lines |
Re: How to filter messages--Self-censorship--ideology made perfect
|
John Landon |
Thu, 30 May 2002 13:59:20 EDT |
116 lines |
Ian Pitchfork
|
Maurice Bazin |
Sat, 18 May 2002 23:00:50 -0200 |
46 lines |
Re: John Landon's Tribute to Stephen Jay Gould
|
Herb Fox |
Mon, 19 May 1980 16:30:32 -0400 |
572 lines |
Re: John Landon's Tribute to Stephen Jay Gould
|
John Landon |
Fri, 24 May 2002 21:13:19 EDT |
163 lines |
Re: Joseph Alper
|
ahughes |
Fri, 24 May 2002 10:55:06 -0500 |
13 lines |
Re: Joseph Alper
|
Louis Proyect |
Fri, 24 May 2002 12:06:00 -0400 |
26 lines |
Re: Joseph Alper
|
M. B. Weissman |
Fri, 24 May 2002 11:30:30 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: Joseph Alper
|
M. B. Weissman |
Fri, 24 May 2002 11:37:48 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: Joseph Alper
|
Ivan Handler |
Fri, 24 May 2002 11:55:07 -0500 |
41 lines |
MY DEBATE WITH GINTIS
|
Michael H Goldhaber |
Sun, 12 May 2002 21:24:10 -0700 |
306 lines |
Nation on Gould
|
John Landon |
Tue, 28 May 2002 19:29:38 EDT |
160 lines |
New Scientist - Religion implicated in obsessive compulsive disorder
|
Ivan Handler |
Wed, 29 May 2002 19:45:44 -0500 |
1061 lines |
New topic.
|
Maurice Bazin |
Tue, 14 May 2002 10:38:45 -0200 |
85 lines |
Re: New topic.
|
Joe Schwartz |
Tue, 14 May 2002 10:47:39 EDT |
24 lines |
Re: Newman and Handler
|
Ian Pitchford |
Thu, 16 May 2002 19:09:31 +0100 |
87 lines |
Re: Newman and Handler
|
Ivan Handler |
Thu, 16 May 2002 14:07:56 -0500 |
95 lines |
Re: Newman and Handler
|
Ian Pitchford |
Thu, 16 May 2002 20:21:16 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: Newman and Handler
|
Chandler Davis |
Thu, 16 May 2002 17:02:31 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Newman and Handler
|
Ivan Handler |
Thu, 16 May 2002 23:21:34 -0500 |
137 lines |
Posted to Marxmail
|
Louis Proyect |
Tue, 21 May 2002 11:29:24 -0400 |
36 lines |
Query on Book Review
|
Carrol Cox |
Fri, 31 May 2002 08:40:51 -0500 |
15 lines |
Re: Query on Book Review
|
John Landon |
Fri, 31 May 2002 10:18:04 EDT |
181 lines |
Re: Query on Book Review
|
Richard Levins |
Fri, 31 May 2002 11:22:30 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Query on Book Review
|
Phil Gasper |
Fri, 31 May 2002 08:22:55 -0700 |
183 lines |
Re: Query on Book Review--Amazon review on Gould
|
John Landon |
Fri, 31 May 2002 10:34:08 EDT |
136 lines |
Re: Query on Book Review--Science for People??
|
John Landon |
Fri, 31 May 2002 10:26:51 EDT |
90 lines |
Reformatted Levins article
|
Louis Proyect |
Thu, 2 May 2002 16:23:57 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: Reformatted Levins article
|
Rich Cowan |
Thu, 2 May 2002 17:08:35 -0400 |
39 lines |
Respectful? Buddhist bashing and unsubbed from Pen-l
|
John Landon |
Thu, 30 May 2002 11:45:24 EDT |
125 lines |
Spinach and Human Nature etc
|
Ian Pitchford |
Mon, 13 May 2002 10:32:21 +0100 |
170 lines |
Stephen Jay Gould
|
Ian Pitchford |
Fri, 31 May 2002 12:19:02 +0100 |
43 lines |
Stephen Jay Gould addenda
|
Louis Proyect |
Fri, 24 May 2002 09:32:34 -0400 |
141 lines |
Stephen Jay Gould addenda
|
Louis Proyect |
Fri, 24 May 2002 12:50:00 -0400 |
59 lines |
Stephen Jay Gould is dead
|
Louis Proyect |
Mon, 20 May 2002 15:22:34 -0400 |
213 lines |
Re: Stephen Jay Gould is dead
|
Richard Levins |
Tue, 21 May 2002 10:53:50 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: Stephen Jay Gould is dead
|
Louis Proyect |
Tue, 21 May 2002 11:49:07 -0400 |
81 lines |
Re: Stephen Jay Gould is dead
|
Val Dusek |
Wed, 22 May 2002 07:21:05 EDT |
52 lines |
Re: Stephen Jay Gould is dead
|
Ivan Handler |
Wed, 22 May 2002 17:44:56 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: Stephen Jay Gould is dead
|
John Landon |
Thu, 23 May 2002 07:30:28 EDT |
170 lines |
Re: Stephen Jay Gould is dead--Gould's real legacy
|
John Landon |
Wed, 22 May 2002 09:19:04 EDT |
98 lines |
Steven Rose on Gould
|
Phil Gasper |
Sun, 26 May 2002 21:40:09 -0700 |
480 lines |
Re: Steven Rose on Gould--Darwin Propaganda Machine
|
John Landon |
Mon, 27 May 2002 11:01:03 EDT |
97 lines |
Re: Steven Rose on Gould--Darwin Propaganda Machine
|
Ivan Handler |
Mon, 27 May 2002 13:06:47 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Steven Rose on Gould--Darwin Propaganda Machine
|
Phil Gasper |
Mon, 27 May 2002 12:23:03 -0700 |
163 lines |
Re: Steven Rose on Gould--Darwin Propaganda Machine
|
John Landon |
Mon, 27 May 2002 16:24:17 EDT |
123 lines |
Re: Steven Rose on Gould--Darwin Propaganda Machine
|
John Landon |
Mon, 27 May 2002 16:35:14 EDT |
98 lines |
Re: Steven Rose on Gould--Darwin Propaganda Machine
|
John Landon |
Tue, 28 May 2002 11:43:54 EDT |
122 lines |
The Bell Curve, The Pioneer Fund, and American Eugenics
|
Ian Pitchford |
Tue, 28 May 2002 14:41:35 +0100 |
52 lines |
The End of the Beginning
|
Ian Pitchford |
Thu, 9 May 2002 10:49:49 +0100 |
54 lines |
THE MONSANTO AMENDMENT In The Indian Patent Act
|
Sam Anderson |
Wed, 29 May 2002 10:44:51 -0700 |
278 lines |
The Possible Origin of Culture
|
Ian Pitchford |
Thu, 16 May 2002 11:09:48 +0100 |
73 lines |
The Savings and Clone Scandal
|
Phil Gasper |
Fri, 31 May 2002 15:06:32 -0700 |
81 lines |
Toolbar for scientists, clinicians, and philosophers
|
Ian Pitchford |
Thu, 9 May 2002 10:49:35 +0100 |
48 lines |
Tribute to Stephen Jay Gould
|
Louis Proyect |
Thu, 23 May 2002 13:34:32 -0400 |
153 lines |
Re: Tribute to Stephen Jay Gould
|
John Landon |
Thu, 23 May 2002 17:04:11 EDT |
187 lines |
U.S. Military Proposes Illegal Bioweapons Research [...and it could already be happening]
|
Sam Anderson |
Tue, 14 May 2002 06:55:19 -0700 |
94 lines |
unsubscribe
|
M. B. Weissman |
Tue, 14 May 2002 10:33:58 -0500 |
19 lines |
What's A Brain For? by David P. Barash
|
Ian Pitchford |
Thu, 16 May 2002 08:53:51 +0100 |
67 lines |
Re: What's A Brain For? by David P. Barash
|
Ivan Handler |
Thu, 16 May 2002 11:29:02 -0500 |
106 lines |
Re: What's A Brain For? by David P. Barash
|
NEWMAN STUART |
Thu, 16 May 2002 12:49:43 -0400 |
132 lines |
Re: What's A Brain For? by David P. Barash
|
Ivan Handler |
Thu, 16 May 2002 12:23:48 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: What's A Brain For? by David P. Barash
|
joseph schwartz |
Thu, 16 May 2002 22:03:21 +0100 |
15 lines |
Re: What's A Brain For? by David P. Barash
|
Michael H Goldhaber |
Thu, 16 May 2002 21:14:00 -0700 |
44 lines |