LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for UVMFLOWNET Archives


UVMFLOWNET Archives

UVMFLOWNET Archives


April 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

<No subject> (10 messages)
A helping hand please (3 messages)
AAA screening (5 messages)
accredited with ICAVL? (1 message)
advertisements (1 message)
Advertising on Flownet : please read my words carefully (4 messages)
ALL Call (25 messages)
Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL? (42 messages)
carotid doppler study criteria (9 messages)
cell phone etiquette and u/s exams (26 messages)
cell phone etiquette and u/s exams & children (9 messages)
Compartment Syndrom (6 messages)
Compartment Syndrome (1 message)
CRITICAL VALUES (4 messages)
Datacheck (1 message)
Datachek (4 messages)
ECA and internal iliac stenosis criteria (7 messages)
Ergonomic ultrasound chairs (4 messages)
Examples of report format (1 message)
Feedback (10 messages)
Fun Friday Fact (3 messages)
GFR ?? (1 message)
GUI's Vascular U/S Interpretation course: June 18-19 (2 messages)
HELP (5 messages)
Homan's Sign (4 messages)
Homans' Sign (2 messages)
ICAVL Q.A. Over-reading? (5 messages)
ICAVL Repeat Exam Q.A. Pathway (1 message)
Imaging Follow Up of Aortoendografts and arterial bypass grafts (2 messages)
job opportunity (4 messages)
Job Posting (1 message)
Last chance at a 2006 GE Logiqbook XP (2 messages)
Licensing (1 message)
Licensure (6 messages)
Looking for RVT (5 messages)
Looking for RVT for Sacramento Fulltime-competitve salary (1 message)
NASCET carotid duplex criteria (5 messages)
New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson (32 messages)
New Mexico Licensure (8 messages)
patient chart diagrams? (6 messages)
Philips frustration (5 messages)
physician exam (5 messages)
poll: average salary (19 messages)
preliminary reports (11 messages)
preliminary reports / scope of practice (4 messages)
preliminary reports / scope of practice[Scanned] (3 messages)
PRF default (4 messages)
Probe cleaning (3 messages)
Pseudo compressions (16 messages)
question regarding a lovenox protocol (50 messages)
Register Today for the 2009 SVU Annual Conference (1 message)
renal artery studies (3 messages)
RVT -RDMS Sonographer Available San Francisco Bay Area (1 message)
salaries (5 messages)
Screenings (4 messages)
SMA/celiac stenosis (2 messages)
Step for venous insufficiency testing (3 messages)
Strategies for a Profitable Vascular Lab -- Register Today! (1 message)
Strategies for a Profitable Vascular Lab -- Register Today! - CORRECTION (1 message)
test (1 message)
The Mysterious Disappearing Plaque (10 messages)
Twitter (8 messages)
Valvular Incomp for Closure procedure approvals (13 messages)
Vascular lab profitabilty (1 message)
venous ulcers (3 messages)
Weekend Call (6 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

UVMFLOWNET Home

UVMFLOWNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

<No subject>

Pizzo, Barbara

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:45:29 -0600

130 lines

Terry Zwakenberg

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:00:06 -0500

158 lines

Kelly

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:18:59 -0400

331 lines

DC

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 13:04:35 -0400

309 lines

Mina Tohid

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:12:06 -0700

223 lines

Smith, Matthew G.

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 08:29:54 -0400

450 lines

Mina Tohid

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:38:41 -0700

318 lines

Smith, Matthew G.

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:53:43 -0400

196 lines

Nancy Hohn

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:58:39 -0500

213 lines

Smith, Matthew G.

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:20:52 -0400

280 lines

New Thread

A helping hand please

A helping hand please

Terrence D. Case, M.Ed.,RVT

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:08:22 -0400

194 lines

Re: A helping hand please

Ramona McNeice

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:37:51 -0700

164 lines

Re: A helping hand please

Steve Haracznak

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:29:42 -0400

270 lines

New Thread

AAA screening

AAA screening

Jeff Stanley

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:28:51 -0500

74 lines

Re: AAA screening

Jack I. Siegel

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:32:37 -0400

57 lines

Re: AAA screening

Kelly

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:40:05 -0400

266 lines

Re: AAA screening

Steve Haracznak

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:55:16 -0400

379 lines

Re: AAA screening

Denise Levy

Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:35:48 -0700

145 lines

New Thread

accredited with ICAVL?

accredited with ICAVL?

subscribe uvmflownet Elizabeth Gault

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:51:42 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

advertisements

Re: advertisements

Fabian White

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 15:47:46 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Advertising on Flownet : please read my words carefully

Advertising on Flownet : please read my words carefully

Steve Knight

Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:10:38 -0400

104 lines

Re: Advertising on Flownet : please read my words carefully

Jack I. Siegel

Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:54:56 +0000

111 lines

Re: Advertising on Flownet : please read my words carefully

Claudia Benge

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:48:21 -0400

315 lines

Re: Advertising on Flownet : please read my words carefully

Kathy Palmieri

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:44:06 EDT

268 lines

New Thread

ALL Call

Re: ALL Call

subscribe uvmflownet Elizabeth Gault

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:55:39 +0000

42 lines

Re: ALL Call

Alstrand, Lesley

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:17:44 -0700

173 lines

Re: ALL Call

Bill Beymer

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:18:16 -0400

134 lines

Re: ALL Call

Jack I. Siegel

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:26:04 -0400

112 lines

Re: ALL Call

Jack I. Siegel

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:33:37 -0400

130 lines

Re: ALL Call

jamie swetnam

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:35:01 -0700

72 lines

Re: ALL Call

Card,Jason

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:11:20 -0700

62 lines

Re: ALL Call

subscribe uvmflownet Elizabeth Gault

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:33:07 +0000

40 lines

Re: ALL Call

Doug Marcum

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:41:03 -0400

118 lines

Re: ALL Call

Mina Tohid

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:48:03 -0700

139 lines

Re: ALL Call

Doug Marcum

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:28:58 -0400

182 lines

Re: ALL Call

Jack I. Siegel

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:59:15 -0400

31 lines

Re: ALL Call

Cynthia Shillingsburg

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:31:49 -0400

263 lines

Re: ALL Call

Smith, Matthew G.

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:09:44 -0400

245 lines

Re: ALL Call

Cynthia Shillingsburg

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:27:49 -0400

199 lines

Re: ALL Call

Smith, Matthew G.

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:07:13 -0400

382 lines

Re: ALL Call

Cynthia Shillingsburg

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:18:00 -0400

295 lines

Re: ALL Call

Kristy Peeler

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:47:06 -0500

272 lines

Re: ALL Call

Kathy Munson

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:11:06 -0400

79 lines

Re: ALL Call

Kathy Munson

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:19:20 -0400

47 lines

Re: ALL Call

Rita Zeak

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:51:03 -0400

90 lines

Re: ALL Call

Zzooomm

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:07:08 -0500

126 lines

Re: ALL Call

Kathy Munson

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:22:34 -0400

176 lines

Re: ALL Call

Zzooomm

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:36:28 -0500

46 lines

Re: ALL Call

Kathy Munson

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:43:26 -0400

92 lines

New Thread

Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Chris S.

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:49:43 -0400

28 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Rita Zeak

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:10:05 -0400

76 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Mina Tohid

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:15:13 -0700

62 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Chris S.

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:28:44 -0400

20 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Paul Hrdlick

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:30:45 -0400

28 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Terrence D. Case, M.Ed.,RVT

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:30:55 -0400

281 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Chris S.

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:32:36 -0400

16 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Milburn, Donald T (GE Healthcare)

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:35:47 -0400

44 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Milburn, Donald T (GE Healthcare)

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:41:09 -0400

72 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Lisa Mekenas

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:51:07 -0700

225 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

John Kelleher

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:08:30 -0700

341 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Wally Prado

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:41:10 -0400

339 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Jack I. Siegel

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:50:32 -0400

150 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

JASON r

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:04:19 -0700

98 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Chris S.

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:08:16 -0400

26 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:11:52 +0000

36 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Chris S.

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:19:55 -0400

29 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Kristin Combs

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:08:55 -0700

68 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Leslie Stone

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:27:00 -0400

59 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Kelly

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:23:19 -0400

55 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

James Shafer

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:48:56 -0500

40 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Thomas Hargens

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:07:14 -0700

49 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Chris S.

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:14:43 -0400

19 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Barb Lemon

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:54:31 -0500

37 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Benge, Claudia

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:36:00 -0400

406 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Broadbent, Karen

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:00:24 -0500

370 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

JASON r

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:37:07 -0700

360 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Bill Schroedter

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:41:15 +0000

227 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Kristin Combs

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:32:18 -0700

162 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Rita Zeak

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:39:20 -0400

359 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Jack Doppler

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:52:53 +0000

95 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Smith, Matthew G.

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:23:47 -0400

309 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Rita Zeak

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:29:20 -0400

83 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Crafton, James W

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:46:18 -0500

354 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Barb Lemon

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:49:38 -0500

105 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Cindy Weiland

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:58:53 -0400

446 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Rita Zeak

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:12:18 -0400

432 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Bill Schroedter

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:29:30 +0000

390 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

jeff field

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:59:36 -0400

202 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

Williams, David M.

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:54:41 -0500

420 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

bill vandenberg

Sun, 26 Apr 2009 05:33:40 -0700

349 lines

Re: Any good agencies or consultants to help out lab get accredited with ICAVL?

CLAYTON BROWN

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:26:18 -0700

376 lines

New Thread

carotid doppler study criteria

carotid doppler study criteria

Marina Dvorkin

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:47:16 -0700

38 lines

Re: carotid doppler study criteria

Pamela Wickkiser

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:12:55 -0400

122 lines

Re: carotid doppler study criteria

Sal Nicolette

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:49:13 EDT

151 lines

Re: carotid doppler study criteria

Don Ridgway

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:07:54 -0700

91 lines

Re: carotid doppler study criteria

Smith, Matthew G.

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:39:01 -0400

216 lines

Re: carotid doppler study criteria

Reinhard Volkmann

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:17:36 -0400

44 lines

Re: carotid doppler study criteria

Schneider, Joseph R.

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:24:24 -0500

38 lines

Re: carotid Doppler study criteria

Diana Call

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:32:28 -0400

63 lines

Re: carotid Doppler study criteria

Reinhard Volkmann

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:55:12 -0400

95 lines

New Thread

cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Williams, David M.

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:50:43 -0500

48 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Connie McCoy

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:13:26 -0400

15 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Smith, Matthew G.

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:29:27 -0400

76 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Matthew Wise

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:32:21 -0700

73 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Doug Marcum

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:41:48 -0400

48 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Anonymous Ron

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:49:57 -0400

160 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Myers, Ruth

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:59:10 -0400

66 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Jeff Stanley

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:00:25 -0500

81 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Connie McCoy

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:04:49 -0400

15 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Doug Marcum

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:26:30 -0400

46 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Jack I. Siegel

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:27:24 -0400

97 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Kathy Munson

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:45:02 -0400

73 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Kathy Munson

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:49:04 -0400

102 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Barb Lemon

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:16:56 -0500

111 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Rita Zeak

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:05:19 -0400

65 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Doug Marcum

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:42:00 -0400

211 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Connie McCoy

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:38:26 -0400

15 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Kathy Munson

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:57:04 -0400

213 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Kathy Munson

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:57:57 -0400

83 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Jack Doppler

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:44:26 +0000

102 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Robert O. Bingham

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:32:40 -0400

75 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Bobby Chacko

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:57:09 -0400

197 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Gene Doverspike, RVT

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:56:10 -0400

16 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

subscribe uvmflownet Elizabeth Gault

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:30:02 +0000

27 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Cyndi Lufkin

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:52:12 -0700

127 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams

Paula Gehr

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:04:49 -0700

47 lines

New Thread

cell phone etiquette and u/s exams & children

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams & children

Valerie Jill Myers

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:51:07 -0400

25 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams & children

Sacco, Marie (GE Healthcare)

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:55:20 -0400

24 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams & children

Barb Lemon

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:20:16 -0500

53 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams & children

Sacco, Marie (GE Healthcare)

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:25:13 -0400

43 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams & children

Nancy Hohn

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:17:46 -0500

68 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams & children

Don Ridgway

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:51:16 -0700

53 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams & children

Milburn, Donald T (GE Healthcare)

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:58:46 -0400

19 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams & children

Sacco, Marie (GE Healthcare)

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:07:33 -0400

42 lines

Re: cell phone etiquette and u/s exams & children

Jack Doppler

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:24:07 +0000

40 lines

New Thread

Compartment Syndrom

Compartment Syndrom

Randy Troyer

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:59:53 -0400

28 lines

Re: Compartment Syndrom

Smith, Matthew G.

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:21:56 -0400

47 lines

Re: Compartment Syndrom

Jack I. Siegel

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:30:15 -0400

54 lines

Re: Compartment Syndrom

Fabian White

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:18:55 -0500

19 lines

Re: Compartment Syndrom

Jack Doppler

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 05:01:54 +0000

50 lines

Re: Compartment Syndrom

Kristin Combs

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:27:22 -0700

65 lines

New Thread

Compartment Syndrome

Re: Compartment Syndrome

Duane Williams

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:09:30 -0700

110 lines

New Thread

CRITICAL VALUES

CRITICAL VALUES

John Kelleher

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:55:59 -0700

28 lines

Re: CRITICAL VALUES

Ross, Diana

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 09:26:57 -0400

47 lines

Re: CRITICAL VALUES

John Kelleher

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 06:35:22 -0700

74 lines

Re: CRITICAL VALUES

Paul Ramirez

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:00:31 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

Datacheck

Re: Datacheck

Stephanie D. Pugh

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:56:02 -0400

19 lines

New Thread

Datachek

Datachek

Nancy Williams

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:46:39 -0400

17 lines

Re: Datachek

Joe Swenson

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:20:46 +0000

29 lines

Re: Datachek

Jodi Zannino

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:31:12 EDT

50 lines

Re: Datachek

Andrew J. Bebry, RVT

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:03:52 +0000

50 lines

New Thread

ECA and internal iliac stenosis criteria

ECA and internal iliac stenosis criteria

Jodie Siems

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:09:14 -0400

21 lines

Re: ECA and internal iliac stenosis criteria

Ann Marie Kupinski

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:39:14 -0400

52 lines

Re: ECA and internal iliac stenosis criteria

Kristy Peeler

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:21:01 -0500

83 lines

Re: ECA and internal iliac stenosis criteria

Smith, Matthew G.

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:40:33 -0400

103 lines

Re: ECA and internal iliac stenosis criteria

LORI LEVY

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:48:01 -0400

70 lines

Re: ECA and internal iliac stenosis criteria

Jeff Stanley

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:52:18 -0500

117 lines

Re: ECA and internal iliac stenosis criteria

Norma Vandenberghe

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:21:02 -0700

95 lines

New Thread

Ergonomic ultrasound chairs

Ergonomic ultrasound chairs

Warner, Erik

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:38:55 -0700

106 lines

Re: Ergonomic ultrasound chairs

Combs, Kristin

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:59:00 -0500

134 lines

Re: Ergonomic ultrasound chairs

Williams, David M.

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:42:03 -0500

101 lines

Re: Ergonomic ultrasound chairs

Fabian White

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:26:20 -0500

134 lines

New Thread

Examples of report format

Examples of report format

Jodie Siems

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:59:24 -0400

19 lines

New Thread

Feedback

Re: Feedback

Jack I. Siegel

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:12:58 -0400

37 lines

Re: Feedback

Debbie Arnett

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:21:22 -0400

57 lines

Re: Feedback

Estes, Kelly M

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:53:52 -0400

47 lines

Re: Feedback

Rita Zeak

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:11:57 -0400

185 lines

Re: Feedback

Don Ridgway

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:42:41 -0700

76 lines

Re: Feedback

Jack I. Siegel

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:50:02 -0400

114 lines

Re: Feedback

Nancy Williams

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:24:05 -0400

51 lines

Re: Feedback

Terry Zwakenberg

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:12:54 -0500

133 lines

Re: Feedback

Brian Wirick

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:46:47 -0400

17 lines

Re: Feedback

Terrence D. Case, M.Ed.,RVT

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:13:56 -0400

424 lines

New Thread

Fun Friday Fact

Fun Friday Fact

Nancy Hohn

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:01:26 -0500

72 lines

Re: Fun Friday Fact

LICC Vascular Lab

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:11:10 -0400

258 lines

Re: Fun Friday Fact

Williams, David M.

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:41:03 -0500

195 lines

New Thread

GFR ??

GFR ??

Bill Schroedter

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:49:32 +0000

13 lines

New Thread

GUI's Vascular U/S Interpretation course: June 18-19

GUI's Vascular U/S Interpretation course: June 18-19

Lori Green

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:06:42 -0400

124 lines

Re: GUI's Vascular U/S Interpretation course: June 18-19

Chris S.

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:19:49 -0400

140 lines

New Thread

HELP

HELP

Mina Tohid

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:52:21 -0700

30 lines

Re: HELP

Kim Bailey

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:32:57 EDT

78 lines

Re: HELP

Terry Case

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:03:26 -0400

43 lines

Re: HELP

Kim Bailey

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:36:19 EDT

154 lines

Re: HELP

Mina Tohid

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:26:33 -0700

88 lines

New Thread

Homan's Sign

Re: Homan's Sign

SC

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:48:19 -0700

233 lines

Re: Homan's Sign

Fabian White

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:13:47 -0500

159 lines

Re: Homan's Sign

Paul Ramirez

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:48:47 -0400

26 lines

Re: Homan's Sign

Craig Hume

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:18:58 +1000

70 lines

New Thread

Homans' Sign

Homans' Sign

Johnson, Bill

Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:15:48 -0700

87 lines

Re: Homans' Sign

SC

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:19:14 -0700

239 lines

New Thread

ICAVL Q.A. Over-reading?

ICAVL Q.A. Over-reading?

Randy Troyer

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:43:04 -0400

14 lines

Re: ICAVL Q.A. Over-reading?

Kristy Peeler

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 07:49:46 -0500

33 lines

Re: ICAVL Q.A. Over-reading?

Cindy Weiland

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:01:46 -0400

49 lines

Re: ICAVL Q.A. Over-reading?

jamie swetnam

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:28:57 -0700

44 lines

Re: ICAVL Q.A. Over-reading?

Connie McCoy

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:31:01 -0400

297 lines

New Thread

ICAVL Repeat Exam Q.A. Pathway

ICAVL Repeat Exam Q.A. Pathway

Randy Troyer

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:41:23 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

Imaging Follow Up of Aortoendografts and arterial bypass grafts

Imaging Follow Up of Aortoendografts and arterial bypass grafts

Kathy Munson

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:45:33 -0400

32 lines

Re: Imaging Follow Up of Aortoendografts and arterial bypass grafts

Stephanie D. Pugh

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:50:59 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

job opportunity

job opportunity

Susan Gustavson

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:26:41 -0400

22 lines

Re: job opportunity

Dorothy Power

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:13:03 -0500

27 lines

Re: job opportunity

Carol Winters

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:29:53 -0400

83 lines

Re: job opportunity

Peterson, Debra

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:13:42 -0400

147 lines

New Thread

Job Posting

Job Posting

Smith, Matthew G.

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:01:22 -0400

249 lines

New Thread

Last chance at a 2006 GE Logiqbook XP

Re: Last chance at a 2006 GE Logiqbook XP

L. Collins

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 00:48:28 -0400

23 lines

Re: Last chance at a 2006 GE Logiqbook XP

James Shafer

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:04:52 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

Licensing

Licensing

Muhammad R.Haider

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:04:56 -0700

184 lines

New Thread

Licensure

Licensure

Nancy Hohn

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:04:35 -0500

176 lines

Re: Licensure

Doug Marcum

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:37:25 -0400

204 lines

Re: Licensure

Terry Zwakenberg

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:45:05 -0500

235 lines

Licensure

doug marcum

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 17:24:13 -0400

118 lines

Re: Licensure

Terry Zwakenberg

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:39:02 -0500

130 lines

Re: Licensure

wanriz

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:33:19 -0700

112 lines

New Thread

Looking for RVT

Looking for RVT

Peterson, Debra

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:07:31 -0400

65 lines

Re: Looking for RVT

Peterson, Debra

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:09:25 -0400

105 lines

Re: Looking for RVT

Blood Clot

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 20:01:21 -0700

82 lines

Re: Looking for RVT

Danielle Sample

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 05:02:29 -0700

21 lines

Re: Looking for RVT

mary krause

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 04:51:11 -0700

56 lines

New Thread

Looking for RVT for Sacramento Fulltime-competitve salary

Looking for RVT for Sacramento Fulltime-competitve salary

Sono Solutions

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:08:21 -0700

41 lines

New Thread

NASCET carotid duplex criteria

NASCET carotid duplex criteria

Chris S.

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:49:43 -0400

18 lines

Re: NASCET carotid duplex criteria

Norma Vandenberghe

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:48:03 -0700

40 lines

Re: NASCET carotid duplex criteria

Schneider, Joseph R.

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:58:29 -0500

77 lines

Re: NASCET carotid duplex criteria

Paula Gehr

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:51:26 -0700

78 lines

Re: NASCET carotid duplex criteria

Chris S.

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:15:16 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Terry Zwakenberg

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:53:59 -0500

53 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Doug Marcum

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:04:54 -0400

110 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Terry Zwakenberg

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:11:24 -0500

157 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Doug Marcum

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:36:22 -0400

217 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Doug Marcum

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:45:46 -0400

156 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Terry Zwakenberg

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:47:37 -0500

260 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Jack I. Siegel

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:48:28 -0400

98 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Nathalie Garbani

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:49:37 -0400

228 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Terry Zwakenberg

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:49:47 -0500

176 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Jack I. Siegel

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:53:20 -0400

149 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Orlando Ultrasound

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:54:29 +0000

219 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Terry Zwakenberg

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:56:20 -0500

238 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Doug Marcum

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:13:09 -0400

335 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Doug Marcum

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:15:16 -0400

161 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Terry Zwakenberg

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:16:23 -0500

374 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Jack I. Siegel

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:22:11 -0400

206 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Terry Zwakenberg

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:32:31 -0500

351 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Doug Marcum

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:33:48 -0400

219 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Smith, Matthew G.

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:58:54 -0400

195 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Jack I. Siegel

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:00:56 -0400

335 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Nancy Hohn

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:03:21 -0500

249 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Anonymous Ron

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:06:19 -0400

60 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Jack I. Siegel

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:08:47 -0400

75 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Nathalie Garbani

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:06:08 -0400

214 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Nathalie Garbani

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:07:14 -0400

330 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Doug Marcum

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:15:03 -0400

344 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Terry Zwakenberg

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:32:42 -0500

94 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Terry Zwakenberg

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:41:49 -0500

125 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Anonymous Ron

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:42:52 -0400

55 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Pamela Brathwaite

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:24:45 -0400

264 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Terry Zwakenberg

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:01:25 -0500

248 lines

Re: New Mexico Bill signed by governor Richardson

Kelly

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 20:14:32 -0400

276 lines

New Thread

New Mexico Licensure

Re: New Mexico Licensure

Ross, Diana

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 09:40:08 -0400

165 lines

Re: New Mexico Licensure

Nancy Hohn

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:43:42 -0500

221 lines

new mexico licensure

Ann Marie Kupinski

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:54:12 -0400

198 lines

Re: New Mexico Licensure

Steve Haracznak

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:19:03 -0400

215 lines

Re: New Mexico Licensure

Steve Haracznak

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:21:08 -0400

277 lines

Re: New Mexico Licensure

Nancy Hohn

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:25:09 -0500

333 lines

Re: new mexico licensure

Terry Zwakenberg

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:25:08 -0500

125 lines

Re: New Mexico Licensure

McGonnell, Gerald

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:07:46 -0400

241 lines

New Thread

patient chart diagrams?

patient chart diagrams?

Stephanie D. Pugh

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:39:30 -0400

26 lines

Re: patient chart diagrams?

Sacco, Marie (GE Healthcare)

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:47:58 -0400

50 lines

Re: patient chart diagrams?

Lee Ann Navarro

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:02:25 -0700

99 lines

Re: patient chart diagrams?

Kim Bailey

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:04:15 EDT

72 lines

Re: patient chart diagrams?

subscribe uvmflownet Elizabeth Gault

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:16:38 +0000

28 lines

Re: patient chart diagrams?

Pizzo, Barbara

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:23:55 -0600

226 lines

New Thread

Philips frustration

Philips frustration

michelle vaughan

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:50:12 -0700

149 lines

Re: Philips frustration

Paul Hrdlick

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:17:17 -0400

210 lines

Re: Philips frustration

Smith, Matthew G.

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:39:29 -0400

390 lines

Re: Philips frustration

Kate Holmes

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:38:26 -0400

108 lines

Re: Philips frustration

Bonnie Johnson

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:40:48 -0700

438 lines

New Thread

physician exam

physician exam

Ann Marie Kupinski

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:09:47 -0400

147 lines

Re: physician exam

Rebecca Deaver

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:13:51 -0400

229 lines

Re: physician exam

Gatz, Vicki L

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:40:39 -0400

41 lines

Re: physician exam

Douville, Colleen

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:56:20 -0700

467 lines

Re: physician exam

Steve Knight

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:18:28 -0400

387 lines

New Thread

poll: average salary

poll: average salary

anon RVT

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:50:48 -0400

20 lines

Re: poll: average salary

Stephen Rooks

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:55:42 -0400

22 lines

Re: poll: average salary

Jessica Freedman

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:06:16 -0400

95 lines

Re: poll: average salary

Chris S.

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:46:44 -0400

26 lines

Re: poll: average salary

Lisa Mekenas

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:41:56 -0700

40 lines

Re: poll: average salary

Kimberly Cooper

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:06:33 -0700

58 lines

Re: poll: average salary

Denise Levy

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:41:31 -0700

133 lines

Re: poll: average salary

John Kelleher

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:49:38 -0700

442 lines

Re: poll: average salary

Kathy Munson

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:51:34 -0400

163 lines

Re: poll: average salary

Kathy Munson

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:54:18 -0400

218 lines

Re: poll: average salary

Lygia Waters

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:16:24 -0500

308 lines

Re: poll: average salary

Aylward, Barbara

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:19:17 -0500

279 lines

Re: poll: average salary

Kimberly Cooper

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:28:04 -0700

349 lines

Re: poll: average salary

subscribe uvmflownet Elizabeth Gault

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:47:43 +0000

29 lines

Re: poll: average salary

JASON r

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:01:04 -0700

355 lines

Re: poll: average salary

Denise Levy

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:18:21 -0700

362 lines

Re: poll: average salary

John

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:29:43 -0400

402 lines

Re: poll: average salary

Jack Doppler

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:05:30 +0000

112 lines

Re: poll: average salary

angela tsiaknis

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:36:51 -0700

140 lines

New Thread

preliminary reports

preliminary reports

Pruett, Marcella J

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:11:07 -0400

28 lines

Re: preliminary reports

Nancy Hohn

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:33:40 -0500

50 lines

Re: preliminary reports

Pizzo, Barbara

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:43:12 -0600

95 lines

Re: preliminary reports

Don Ridgway

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:01:15 -0700

110 lines

Re: preliminary reports

Fabian White

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:12:28 -0500

82 lines

Re: preliminary reports

Barb Lemon

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:28:03 -0500

153 lines

Re: preliminary reports

McGonnell, Gerald

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 16:33:26 -0400

57 lines

Re: preliminary reports

Smith, Matthew G.

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 16:52:17 -0400

53 lines

Re: preliminary reports

Paul Hrdlick

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:04:54 -0400

95 lines

Re: preliminary reports

Kristy Peeler

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 07:47:31 -0500

116 lines

Re: preliminary reports

Jack Doppler

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 06:01:07 +0000

54 lines

New Thread

preliminary reports / scope of practice

preliminary reports / scope of practice

Pruett, Marcella J

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:30:22 -0400

37 lines

Re: preliminary reports / scope of practice

Terry Zwakenberg

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:26:58 -0500

111 lines

Re: preliminary reports / scope of practice

Don Ridgway

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 11:51:46 -0700

62 lines

Re: preliminary reports / scope of practice

Estes, Kelly M

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:04:33 -0400

58 lines

New Thread

preliminary reports / scope of practice[Scanned]

Re: preliminary reports / scope of practice[Scanned]

Pruett, Marcella J

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:33:24 -0400

80 lines

Re: preliminary reports / scope of practice[Scanned]

Jamie Heckman

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:09:01 -0400

15 lines

Re: preliminary reports / scope of practice[Scanned]

Kathy Munson

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:13:41 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

PRF default

PRF default

Terrence D. Case, M.Ed.,RVT

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:48:04 -0400

215 lines

Re: PRF default

Terry Zwakenberg

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:55:56 -0500

162 lines

Re: PRF default

Paul Hrdlick

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:56:35 -0400

158 lines

Re: PRF default

Craig Hume

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:02:20 +1000

167 lines

New Thread

Probe cleaning

FW: Probe cleaning

Milburn, Donald T (GE Healthcare)

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:56:46 -0400

218 lines

Re: FW: Probe cleaning

Kathy Palmieri

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:03:17 EDT

284 lines

Re: FW: Probe cleaning

Paul Ramirez

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:05:08 -0400

19 lines

New Thread

Pseudo compressions

Pseudo compressions

Fabian White

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:34:37 -0500

23 lines

Re: Pseudo compressions

Pizzo, Barbara

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:09:15 -0600

196 lines

Re: Pseudo compressions

Jasa, Randy

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:40:48 -0400

351 lines

Re: Pseudo compressions

Fabian White

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:43:39 -0500

53 lines

Re: Pseudo compressions

John Kelleher

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:15:09 -0700

466 lines

Re: Pseudo compressions

Paul Ramirez

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:02:22 -0400

30 lines

Re: Pseudo compressions

Richard M. Boyd

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:54:31 -0500

32 lines

Re: Pseudo compressions

Robert J. Szarnicki,MD

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:14:03 EDT

167 lines

Re: Pseudo compressions

Robert J. Szarnicki,MD

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:23:44 EDT

212 lines

Re: Pseudo compressions

Paul Hrdlick

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:41:20 -0400

127 lines

Re: Pseudo compressions

James Shafer

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:17:39 -0500

433 lines

Re: Pseudo compressions

Brian Wirick

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:38:19 -0400

22 lines

Re: Pseudo compressions

subscribe uvmflownet Elizabeth Gault

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:33:11 +0000

151 lines

Re: Pseudo compressions

Rita Zeak

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:07:56 -0400

176 lines

Re: Pseudo compressions

Paul Ramirez

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:35:02 -0400

34 lines

Re: Pseudo compressions

Johnson, Bill

Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:36:42 -0700

59 lines

New Thread

question regarding a lovenox protocol

question regarding a lovenox protocol

jamie swetnam

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:20:24 -0700

109 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Bonnie Johnson

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:30:22 -0700

290 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Zzooomm

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:06:51 -0500

244 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Robert J. Szarnicki,MD

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:21:11 EDT

417 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Bonnie Johnson

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:48:14 -0700

404 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Zzooomm

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 23:17:19 -0500

333 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Bonnie Johnson

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:29:35 -0700

326 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Janice Giuca

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:53:06 -0400

227 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Denise Levy

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:21:38 -0700

459 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Joe Swenson

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:14:13 +0000

220 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Denise Levy

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:44:47 -0700

130 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Dawn

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:39:46 -0400

47 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

subscribe uvmflownet Elizabeth Gault

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:32:09 +0000

42 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Smith, Matthew G.

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:39:03 -0400

204 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

subscribe uvmflownet Elizabeth Gault

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:27:40 +0000

82 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Smith, Matthew G.

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:57:27 -0400

221 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Zzooomm

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:23:04 -0500

128 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Peggie Sattler

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:07:50 -0700

180 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Kelly

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 09:51:16 -0400

300 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

JASON r

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:18:40 -0700

370 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Jack I. Siegel

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:23:09 +0000

192 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Zzooomm

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:37:58 -0500

238 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Denise Levy

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 09:50:05 -0700

289 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Jay Swede

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:13:07 -0600

312 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Heath Beaver

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:14:27 -0600

445 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Don Ridgway

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:17:30 -0700

97 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Zzooomm

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:42:56 -0500

399 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Jack I. Siegel

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 21:18:24 +0000

380 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

JASON r

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:02:34 -0700

335 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Paul Hrdlick

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 12:44:52 -0400

406 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Deborah Richert

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:31:27 -0500

460 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Zzooomm

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:08:02 -0500

79 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Doug Marcum

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:14:15 -0400

119 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Jack I. Siegel

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:42:29 +0000

116 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Doug Marcum

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:10:00 -0400

154 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Zzooomm

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:32:25 -0500

161 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Michele Bultje

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 20:19:40 -0400

254 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

JASON r

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:37:03 -0700

134 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

subscribe uvmflownet Elizabeth Gault

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:02:16 +0000

480 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

js bishop

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:19:40 -0700

400 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Deborah Richert

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:51:05 -0500

145 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Barb Lemon

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:41:33 -0500

114 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Wilkey, Colette

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:17:06 -0500

88 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Michele Robinson

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:35:11 EDT

47 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Deborah Richert

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:17:07 -0500

90 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Michele Robinson

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:05:59 EDT

42 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Kathy Munson

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:40:46 -0400

19 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Dawn

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:57:05 -0400

41 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Pizzo, Barbara

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:54:22 -0600

387 lines

Re: question regarding a lovenox protocol

Lee Ann Navarro

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:35:54 -0700

333 lines

New Thread

Register Today for the 2009 SVU Annual Conference

Register Today for the 2009 SVU Annual Conference

Frankie Hamme

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:40:29 -0400

50 lines

New Thread

renal artery studies

Re: renal artery studies

Barb Lemon

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:36:57 -0500

65 lines

Re: renal artery studies

Kathy Munson

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:56:28 -0400

125 lines

Re: renal artery studies

Paul Ramirez

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:46:24 -0400

18 lines

New Thread

RVT -RDMS Sonographer Available San Francisco Bay Area

RVT -RDMS Sonographer Available San Francisco Bay Area

Sono Solutions

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:54:08 -0700

49 lines

New Thread

salaries

salaries

Lisa Mekenas

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:01:05 -0700

262 lines

Re: salaries

Smith, Matthew G.

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:27:04 -0400

300 lines

Re: salaries

Cynthia Shillingsburg

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:36:48 -0400

243 lines

Re: salaries

Joe Swenson

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:43:11 +0000

213 lines

Re: salaries

Connie McCoy

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:46:30 -0400

15 lines

New Thread

Screenings

Screenings

Lee Ann

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:55:50 -0400

20 lines

Re: Screenings

Mina Tohid

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:36:11 -0700

55 lines

Re: Screenings

Lee Ann Navarro

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:40:58 -0700

97 lines

Re: Screenings

Mina Tohid

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:30:29 -0700

109 lines

New Thread

SMA/celiac stenosis

SMA/celiac stenosis

LICC Vascular Lab

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:37:38 -0400

86 lines

Re: SMA/celiac stenosis

Paul Ramirez

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:15:09 -0400

17 lines

New Thread

Step for venous insufficiency testing

Step for venous insufficiency testing

Kate Holmes

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:44:32 -0400

18 lines

Re: Step for venous insufficiency testing

Jasa, Randy

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:43:48 -0400

44 lines

Re: Step for venous insufficiency testing

Kate Holmes

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:54:55 -0400

52 lines

New Thread

Strategies for a Profitable Vascular Lab -- Register Today!

Strategies for a Profitable Vascular Lab -- Register Today!

Frankie Hamme

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:57:27 -0400

57 lines

New Thread

Strategies for a Profitable Vascular Lab -- Register Today! - CORRECTION

Re: Strategies for a Profitable Vascular Lab -- Register Today! - CORRECTION

Frankie Hamme

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:01:05 -0400

74 lines

New Thread

test

test

Williams, David M.

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:38:27 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

The Mysterious Disappearing Plaque

Re: The Mysterious Disappearing Plaque

<>

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:31:04 -0400

180 lines

Re: The Mysterious Disappearing Plaque

Don Ridgway

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:06:27 -0700

236 lines

Re: The Mysterious Disappearing Plaque

vik akselrud

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 20:28:15 -0700

256 lines

Re: The Mysterious Disappearing Plaque

Don Ridgway

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 20:26:32 -0700

261 lines

Re: The Mysterious Disappearing Plaque

Jeff Stanley

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:38:15 -0500

261 lines

Re: The Mysterious Disappearing Plaque

Don Ridgway

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 07:57:50 -0700

283 lines

Re: The Mysterious Disappearing Plaque

Estes, Kelly M

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:02:57 -0400

162 lines

Re: The Mysterious Disappearing Plaque

Doug Marcum

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:15:19 -0400

327 lines

Re: The Mysterious Disappearing Plaque

Estes, Kelly M

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:17:53 -0400

342 lines

Re: The Mysterious Disappearing Plaque

Doug Marcum

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:58:39 -0400

65 lines

New Thread

Twitter

Twitter

Stephanie D. Pugh

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:31:58 -0400

16 lines

Re: Twitter

Norma Vandenberghe

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:34:06 -0700

39 lines

Re: Twitter

Estes, Kelly M

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:37:01 -0400

47 lines

Re: Twitter

Rita Zeak

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:36:58 -0400

65 lines

Re: Twitter

Derek Butler

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:44:28 -0400

52 lines

Re: Twitter

Sacco, Marie (GE Healthcare)

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:47:00 -0400

61 lines

Re: Twitter

Stephanie Pugh

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:08:19 -0500

199 lines

Re: Twitter

Robert Sexton

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:10:53 -0400

17 lines

New Thread

Valvular Incomp for Closure procedure approvals

Valvular Incomp for Closure procedure approvals

Eric Tyler

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:12:05 -0400

60 lines

Re: Valvular Incomp for Closure procedure approvals

Sal Nicolette

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:40:36 EDT

91 lines

Re: Valvular Incomp for Closure procedure approvals

Estes, Kelly M

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:51:22 -0400

156 lines

Re: Valvular Incomp for Closure procedure approvals

Smith, Matthew G.

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:57:40 -0400

182 lines

Re: Valvular Incomp for Closure procedure approvals

Marty

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:12:51 -0400

227 lines

Re: Valvular Incomp for Closure procedure approvals

Mina Tohid

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:09:38 -0700

74 lines

Re: Valvular Incomp for Closure procedure approvals

Angela M. Mulford

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:30:31 EDT

145 lines

Re: Valvular Incomp for Closure procedure approvals

Barb Lemon

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:59:23 -0500

144 lines

Re: Valvular Incomp for Closure procedure approvals

Smith, Matthew G.

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:22:58 -0400

238 lines

Re: Valvular Incomp for Closure procedure approvals

Doug Marcum

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:25:07 -0400

332 lines

Re: Valvular Incomp for Closure procedure approvals

Marty

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:00:49 -0400

328 lines

Re: Valvular Incomp for Closure procedure approvals

Joe Swenson

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:20:17 +0000

89 lines

Re: Valvular Incomp for Closure procedure approvals

Eric Tyler

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:00:08 -0400

197 lines

New Thread

Vascular lab profitabilty

Vascular lab profitabilty

Nancy Williams

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:20:51 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

venous ulcers

venous ulcers

JASON r

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:07:02 -0700

62 lines

Re: venous ulcers

Denise Levy

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:10:27 -0700

72 lines

Re: venous ulcers

JASON r

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:48:19 -0700

118 lines

New Thread

Weekend Call

Re: Weekend Call

Jeffrey Yarus

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:40:16 -0400

39 lines

Re: Weekend Call

Kristy Peeler

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:02:44 -0500

405 lines

Re: Weekend Call

Jamie Heckman

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:07:12 -0400

17 lines

Re: Weekend Call

Sid Holec

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 23:33:13 -0400

143 lines

Re: Weekend Call

Smith, Matthew G.

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:39:52 -0400

369 lines

Re: Weekend Call

Jack I. Siegel

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:50:25 -0400

104 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager