LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for UVMFLOWNET Archives


UVMFLOWNET Archives

UVMFLOWNET Archives


February 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

'P-point (4 messages)
'P-point - Found word(s) list error free guaranteed in the Text body (2 messages)
'P-point' ????? (3 messages)
2010 RPVI Review Program - ESP Ultrasound - Register Now (2 messages)
93990 and 93971 same visit (2 messages)
<No subject> (4 messages)
AAA measurements (17 messages)
abdominal/renals (9 messages)
abdominals/renals (1 message)
Acceleration time in liver transplants (5 messages)
Acuson Sequoia 512 (2 messages)
AVF stenosis criteria (6 messages)
Banjo Players (7 messages)
Brachiocephalic and/or prox. Subclavian artery aneurysm (4 messages)
Carotid criteria (11 messages)
Carotid Screening (2 messages)
carotid study (14 messages)
CIMT measurements (5 messages)
Complications s/p IVC filter (7 messages)
Concurrent Vascular Ultrasound Introductory and Advanced Interpretation Course (1 message)
Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!! (23 messages)
Correlations (7 messages)
Dale Aspelund (1 message)
Duplex machine replacement (30 messages)
Echo Flownet (3 messages)
Educator's role and Job description (1 message)
evlt billing (14 messages)
Flownet "status" (1 message)
Getting a little too close for comfort - 21.2% Cut to Take Effect March 1 (4 messages)
Help with coding needed (9 messages)
HELP! (5 messages)
High bifurcation pts (14 messages)
high window boys (1 message)
IDTF (2 messages)
impression reports (6 messages)
IVC Filter (2 messages)
Jobs (2 messages)
LE Post-Stent Criteria (1 message)
Looking for RVT in Stuart, FL area (7 messages)
Matt S (1 message)
Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter (2 messages)
PADnet (5 messages)
Philips HD15 (6 messages)
Popliteal Aneurysm (5 messages)
portable exam reimbursement..... (8 messages)
portable testing.... (4 messages)
post processing capability (4 messages)
Quarter of stroke survivors die within a year:study (2 messages)
refurb vendors/facilities in need of probes (1 message)
Register NOW for SVU's RPVI Exam Review Course (3 messages)
Renal art duplex (8 messages)
Renal Scanning on Newborns (2 messages)
selling of used machine (1 message)
SMA/Mesenteric study (18 messages)
SVU Announces New Mentoring Program (1 message)
TCD scanning for children with sickle cell disease (10 messages)
THANK YOU ALL! (1 message)
The bad dream (28 messages)
unsubscribe (1 message)
US guided foam sclerotherapy for varicose veins (2 messages)
USED MACHINE (8 messages)
vascular lab hospital coverage (3 messages)
Vascular Lab Study indications (11 messages)
Vascular Laboratory quality "indicators" (5 messages)
venous reflux testing (4 messages)
[Suspected Spam] Re: Vascular Laboratory quality "indicators" (3 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

UVMFLOWNET Home

UVMFLOWNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

'P-point

Re: 'P-point

Doug

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:42:07 -0500

78 lines

Re: 'P-point

Wally Prado

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:11:24 -0500

195 lines

Re: 'P-point

Kimberly Higgins

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:42:32 -0500

96 lines

Re: 'P-point

Doug Marcum

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:28:09 -0500

118 lines

New Thread

'P-point - Found word(s) list error free guaranteed in the Text body

Re: 'P-point - Found word(s) list error free guaranteed in the Text body

Johnson, Bill

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 14:26:50 -0800

139 lines

Re: 'P-point - Found word(s) list error free guaranteed in the Text body

kai Wee Leong

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 03:03:03 +0000

165 lines

New Thread

'P-point' ?????

'P-point' ?????

kai Wee Leong

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:38:19 +0000

61 lines

Re: 'P-point' ?????

Dhanjil, Surinder

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:44:58 -0000

434 lines

Re: 'P-point' ?????

Diana Neuhardt

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:20:47 -0700

68 lines

New Thread

2010 RPVI Review Program - ESP Ultrasound - Register Now

2010 RPVI Review Program - ESP Ultrasound - Register Now

Ginger Rey

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:26:39 -0500

36 lines

2010 RPVI Review Program - ESP Ultrasound - Register Now

Ginger Rey

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:41:32 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

93990 and 93971 same visit

93990 and 93971 same visit

Jeff Stanley

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:05:14 -0600

79 lines

Re: 93990 and 93971 same visit

Nathalie Garbani

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:14:44 -0500

115 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

Jack Doppler

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:05:51 +0000

38 lines

Pizzo, Barbara

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:26:25 -0700

401 lines

Doug Marcum

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:58:33 -0500

311 lines

Dina DuBose

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 06:10:56 -0800

22 lines

New Thread

AAA measurements

AAA measurements

Card,Jason

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:24:05 -0800

190 lines

Re: AAA measurements

Nathalie Garbani

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:16:45 -0500

206 lines

Re: AAA measurements

Steve Knight

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:00:01 -0500

256 lines

Re: AAA measurements

Bill Schroedter

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:20:17 -0500

347 lines

Re: AAA measurements

JASON r

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:24:35 -0800

287 lines

Re: AAA measurements

Yeung Wen

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:24:52 -0500

352 lines

Re: AAA measurements

JASON r

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:25:22 -0800

340 lines

Re: AAA measurements

Yeung Wen

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:35:05 -0500

369 lines

FW: AAA measurements

Bonnie Johnson

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:52:01 -0800

331 lines

FW: AAA measurements

Bill Schroedter

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:27:31 -0500

263 lines

Re: AAA measurements

JASON r

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:40:18 -0800

208 lines

Re: AAA measurements

Bill Schroedter

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:45:17 -0500

331 lines

Re: FW: AAA measurements

Scott Cutler

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:18:22 -0500

32 lines

Re: AAA measurements

Card,Jason

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:38:33 -0800

192 lines

Re: AAA measurements

Nancy Williams

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:12:58 -0500

271 lines

Re: AAA measurements

Norma Vandenberghe

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:03:05 -0800

327 lines

Re: AAA measurements

Denise Levy

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:54:04 -0800

324 lines

New Thread

abdominal/renals

abdominal/renals

Melissa Rill

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:17:55 -0500

19 lines

Re: abdominal/renals

John Kelleher

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:33:10 -0800

31 lines

Re: abdominal/renals

Barb B. Lemon

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:48:48 -0600

52 lines

Re: abdominal/renals

<>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:54:51 -0500

30 lines

Re: abdominal/renals

Ann Marie Kupinski

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:41:34 -0500

36 lines

Re: abdominal/renals

S. Felton

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:51:43 -0800

74 lines

Re: abdominal/renals

Poe, Patricia (poepa)

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:14:21 -0500

63 lines

Re: abdominal/renals

jamie swetnam

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:26:13 -0800

141 lines

Re: abdominal/renals

Pamela Wickkiser

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 22:33:44 -0500

173 lines

New Thread

abdominals/renals

abdominals/renals

Melissa Rill

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:45:25 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

Acceleration time in liver transplants

Acceleration time in liver transplants

Orlando Ultrasound

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 03:49:32 +0000

311 lines

Re: Acceleration time in liver transplants

<>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:41:16 EST

379 lines

Re: Acceleration time in liver transplants

Kelly

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:16:07 -0500

394 lines

Re: Acceleration time in liver transplants

Norma Vandenberghe

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:26:48 -0800

335 lines

Re: Acceleration time in liver transplants

Orlando Ultrasound

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:34:41 +0000

357 lines

New Thread

Acuson Sequoia 512

Acuson Sequoia 512

Joe Swenson

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 21:21:42 -0500

27 lines

Re: Acuson Sequoia 512

Sue Ovel

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:48:47 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

AVF stenosis criteria

AVF stenosis criteria

kai Wee Leong

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 03:10:09 +0000

77 lines

Re: AVF stenosis criteria

Smith, Matthew G.

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:10:25 -0500

247 lines

Re: AVF stenosis criteria

kai Wee Leong

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:08:19 +0000

62 lines

Re: AVF stenosis criteria

Jack Siegel

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:30:21 +0000

72 lines

Re: AVF stenosis criteria

Smith, Matthew G.

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:38:09 -0500

243 lines

Re: AVF stenosis criteria

Broadbent, Karen

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:40:43 -0600

314 lines

New Thread

Banjo Players

Banjo Players

SC

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:31:57 -0800

119 lines

Re: Banjo Players

Bill Phillips

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:53:22 -0800

416 lines

Re: Banjo Players

Don Ridgway

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:59:08 -0800

90 lines

Re: Banjo Players

Sacco, Marie (GE Healthcare)

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 22:08:55 -0500

374 lines

Re: Banjo Players

Nancy Williams

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 22:34:09 -0500

450 lines

Re: Banjo Players

gdbarnes

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 20:57:41 -0800

172 lines

Re: Banjo Players

Doug Marcum

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 07:00:34 -0500

114 lines

New Thread

Brachiocephalic and/or prox. Subclavian artery aneurysm

Brachiocephalic and/or prox. Subclavian artery aneurysm

Joel D

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 05:34:09 +0000

73 lines

Brachiocephalic and/or prox. Subclavian artery aneurysm

Joel D

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 05:34:36 +0000

73 lines

Re: Brachiocephalic and/or prox. Subclavian artery aneurysm

JASON r

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 05:01:05 -0800

106 lines

Re: Brachiocephalic and/or prox. Subclavian artery aneurysm

Smith, Matthew G.

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:23:50 -0500

227 lines

New Thread

Carotid criteria

Carotid criteria

Card,Jason

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:11:39 -0800

230 lines

Re: Carotid criteria

Phil Silva

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:15:32 -0500

156 lines

Re: Carotid criteria

Bonnie Johnson

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:18:05 -0800

343 lines

Re: Carotid criteria

Jack Siegel

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:33:43 +0000

142 lines

Re: Carotid criteria

Lisa Mekenas

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:43:44 -0800

378 lines

Re: Carotid criteria

Steve Knight

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:22:30 -0500

229 lines

Re: Carotid criteria

Schneider, Joseph R.

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:15:08 -0600

290 lines

Re: Carotid criteria

Betty-Sue/Elizabeth

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 06:03:40 -0500

222 lines

Re: Carotid criteria

Terry Zwakenberg

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:09:05 -0600

92 lines

Re: Carotid criteria

Steve Knight

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:03:44 +0000

184 lines

Re: Carotid criteria

Smith, Matthew G.

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:20:48 -0500

226 lines

New Thread

Carotid Screening

Carotid Screening

Lee, Joshua

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:49:14 -0500

99 lines

Re: Carotid Screening

Denise Levy

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:52:31 -0800

107 lines

New Thread

carotid study

carotid study

Yeung W

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:40:42 -0500

27 lines

Re: carotid study

Card,Jason

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:55:15 -0800

57 lines

Re: carotid study

Nancy Hohn

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:02:01 -0600

76 lines

Re: carotid study

Steve Knight

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:16:21 -0500

103 lines

Re: carotid study

Nathalie Garbani

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:48:24 -0500

65 lines

Re: carotid study

Don Ridgway

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:07:53 -0800

58 lines

Re: carotid study

Nathalie Garbani

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:20:40 -0500

73 lines

Re: carotid study

Jodie Siems

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:23:07 -0600

213 lines

Re: carotid study

Nathalie Garbani

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:05:20 -0500

196 lines

Re: carotid study

Connie McCoy

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:35:58 -0500

16 lines

Re: carotid study

Jodie Siems

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:39:32 -0600

277 lines

Re: carotid study

Bill Wilson

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:48:45 -0500

19 lines

Re: carotid study

Yeung Wen

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:55:20 -0500

58 lines

Re: carotid study

Joel D

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 05:25:25 +0000

122 lines

New Thread

CIMT measurements

CIMT measurements

Paula Gehr

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:01:16 -0800

59 lines

Re: CIMT measurements

Steve Knight

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:58:21 +0000

79 lines

Re: CIMT measurements

Connie McCoy

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:20:02 -0500

15 lines

Re: CIMT measurements

Franklin W. West

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:08:46 -0800

432 lines

Re: CIMT measurements

Jack Siegel

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:54:45 +0000

341 lines

New Thread

Complications s/p IVC filter

Complications s/p IVC filter

C W

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 15:15:31 -0500

37 lines

Re: Complications s/p IVC filter

Jack Siegel

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 20:21:22 +0000

33 lines

Re: Complications s/p IVC filter

Smith, Matthew G.

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 15:55:50 -0500

53 lines

Re: Complications s/p IVC filter

backupplan1613

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:20:04 -0500

145 lines

Re: Complications s/p IVC filter

Smith, Matthew G.

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:49:44 -0500

448 lines

Re: Complications s/p IVC filter

Denise Levy

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 18:22:20 -0800

338 lines

Re: Complications s/p IVC filter

Jack Siegel

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:45:00 +0000

291 lines

New Thread

Concurrent Vascular Ultrasound Introductory and Advanced Interpretation Course

Concurrent Vascular Ultrasound Introductory and Advanced Interpretation Course

Frankie Hamme

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:19:21 -0500

91 lines

New Thread

Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Robert Rosner

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:27:39 -0500

14 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Denise Levy

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:15:54 -0800

48 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Robert Rosner

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:18:37 -0500

17 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Sue Ovel

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:24:37 -0800

70 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Denise Levy

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:32:36 -0800

168 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Norma Bourne

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:17:49 -0500

45 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Stephen Rooks

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:53:55 -0500

65 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Cynthia Shillingsburg

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:06:37 -0500

182 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Doug

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:16:13 -0500

99 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Connie McCoy

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:31:49 -0500

20 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Denise Levy

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:21:22 -0800

107 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Betty-Sue/Elizabeth

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:25:42 -0500

54 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Bill Schroedter

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:08:28 -0500

121 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Cynthia Shillingsburg

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:11:53 -0500

93 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Jeff Stanley

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:25:20 -0600

203 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Duane Williams

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:29:00 -0800

69 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Jack Siegel

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:38:35 +0000

175 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Betty-Sue/Elizabeth

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:42:36 -0500

66 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Bill Wilson

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:53:55 -0500

44 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Connie McCoy

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:17:21 -0500

16 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Robert Rosner

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:50:03 -0500

21 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Norma Bourne

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:01:42 -0500

258 lines

Re: Consumers.... scanning themselves? Nice!!!

Alfonza Riley

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:18:23 -0800

85 lines

New Thread

Correlations

Correlations

Jessa Houtkooper

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 07:26:34 -0800

20 lines

Re: Correlations

Kimberly Higgins

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:38:18 -0500

53 lines

Re: Correlations

Karen Limone

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:43:41 -0500

42 lines

Re: Correlations

Jane Revels

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:44:08 -0500

78 lines

Re: Correlations

Don Ridgway

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:19:01 -0800

67 lines

Re: Correlations

Myers, Ruth

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 13:31:01 -0500

42 lines

Re: Correlations

Connie McCoy

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 22:30:06 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

Dale Aspelund

Dale Aspelund

Steve Haracznak

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:19:29 -0500

67 lines

New Thread

Duplex machine replacement

Duplex machine replacement

Timothy Heffner

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:02:26 -0500

35 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Jim Berry

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:10:23 -0800

29 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Doug Marcum

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:45:45 -0500

51 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Jim Berry

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:12:31 -0800

70 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Williams, David M.

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:30:38 -0600

55 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Doug Marcum

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:44:12 -0500

112 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Bill Wilson

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:39:23 -0500

18 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Barb B. Lemon

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:29:31 -0600

140 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Doug Marcum

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:47:30 -0500

171 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Jeff Stanley

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:07:12 -0600

210 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Barb B. Lemon

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:12:56 -0600

238 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Doug Marcum

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 11:45:47 -0500

73 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Pizzo, Barbara

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 11:44:24 -0700

122 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Jeff Stanley

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 12:51:57 -0600

138 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Steve Knight

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:51:50 -0500

314 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Doug Marcum

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:20:20 -0500

407 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Doug Marcum

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:21:44 -0500

316 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Doug Marcum

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:24:01 -0500

315 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Jeff Stanley

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:43:57 -0600

161 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Smith, Matthew G.

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:09:20 -0500

256 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Myers, Ruth

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:19:12 -0500

384 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Doug Marcum

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:59:02 -0500

291 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Jeff Stanley

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:08:49 -0600

295 lines

Fwd: Duplex machine replacement

Doug Marcum

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:09:23 -0500

335 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Doug Marcum

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:17:46 -0500

339 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Pizzo, Barbara

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:23:47 -0700

148 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Smith, Matthew G.

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:44:25 -0500

274 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Doug Marcum

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:59:48 -0500

240 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Jennifer Garcia

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:16:10 -0500

255 lines

Re: Duplex machine replacement

Jeff Stanley

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:26:58 -0600

276 lines

New Thread

Echo Flownet

Re: Echo Flownet

Paula Gehr

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:37:14 -0800

106 lines

Re: Echo Flownet

Andrew Bebry

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:44:16 -0500

29 lines

Re: Echo Flownet

Barb B. Lemon

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:23:56 -0600

229 lines

New Thread

Educator's role and Job description

Educator's role and Job description

Maguire, Susan

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:40:39 -0500

329 lines

New Thread

evlt billing

evlt billing

Cynthia Shillingsburg

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:17:00 -0500

155 lines

Re: evlt billing

Nancy Williams

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:17:08 -0500

455 lines

FW: evlt billing

Franklin W. West

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:12:15 -0800

238 lines

Re: evlt billing

martha

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:30:11 -0500

468 lines

Re: evlt billing

Doug Marcum

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:36:51 -0500

301 lines

Re: evlt billing

Cynthia Shillingsburg

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:38:33 -0500

228 lines

Re: evlt billing

Doug Marcum

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:47:37 -0500

430 lines

Re: evlt billing

Smith, Matthew G.

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:13:06 -0500

316 lines

Re: evlt billing

Doug Marcum

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:45:25 -0500

375 lines

Re: evlt billing

Doug Marcum

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:01:28 -0500

426 lines

Re: evlt billing

Doug Marcum

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:17:25 -0500

475 lines

Re: evlt billing

Smith, Matthew G.

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:28:16 -0500

303 lines

Re: evlt billing

Barb B. Lemon

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:30:13 -0600

391 lines

Re: evlt billing

Doug Marcum

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:55:13 -0500

369 lines

New Thread

Flownet "status"

Flownet "status"

Doug

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:07:15 -0500

84 lines

New Thread

Getting a little too close for comfort - 21.2% Cut to Take Effect March 1

Getting a little too close for comfort - 21.2% Cut to Take Effect March 1

Franklin W. West

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:39:47 -0800

442 lines

Re: Getting a little too close for comfort - 21.2% Cut to Take Effect March 1

Steve Knight

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:04:45 -0500

336 lines

Re: Getting a little too close for comfort - 21.2% Cut to Take Effect March 1

Jack Siegel

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:50:38 +0000

274 lines

Re: Getting a little too close for comfort - 21.2% Cut to Take Effect March 1

Bill Wilson

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:52:54 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Help with coding needed

Help with coding needed

Wise, Carol

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:07:31 -0500

62 lines

Re: Help with coding needed

Jeff Stanley

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:14:43 -0600

124 lines

Re: Help with coding needed

Kristy Peeler

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:26:13 -0700

78 lines

Re: Help with coding needed

Wise, Carol

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:40:50 -0500

208 lines

Re: Help with coding needed

Jeff Stanley

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:47:45 -0600

283 lines

FW: Help with coding needed

Franklin W. West

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:16:05 -0800

121 lines

Re: Help with coding needed

Jack Siegel

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:58:06 +0000

97 lines

Re: FW: Help with coding needed

Kristy Peeler

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:52:33 -0700

68 lines

Re: FW: Help with coding needed

Franklin W. West

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:34:09 -0800

403 lines

New Thread

HELP!

HELP!

Arleen Laboy

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:01:34 -0800

62 lines

Re: HELP!

Nathalie Garbani

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:18:14 -0500

99 lines

Re: HELP!

Smith, Matthew G.

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:16:31 -0500

412 lines

Re: HELP!

<>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:17:21 EST

365 lines

Re: HELP!

Poe, Patricia (poepa)

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:47:56 -0500

288 lines

New Thread

High bifurcation pts

High bifurcation pts

angela tsiaknis

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:13:18 -0800

39 lines

Re: High bifurcation pts

Steve Knight

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:15:19 +0000

54 lines

Re: High bifurcation pts

Don Ridgway

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:32:33 -0800

45 lines

Re: High bifurcation pts

Angela M. Mulford

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:35:40 EST

89 lines

Re: High bifurcation pts

Smith, Matthew G.

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:21:43 -0500

195 lines

Re: High bifurcation pts

Lisa Kurtz

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:23:36 -0500

221 lines

Re: High bifurcation pts

Paul Hrdlick

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:30:23 +0000

141 lines

Re: High bifurcation pts

Nathalie Garbani

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:57:32 -0500

93 lines

Re: High bifurcation pts

Connie McCoy

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:09:06 -0500

15 lines

Re: High bifurcation pts

K. Beach

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:20:48 -0800

84 lines

Re: High bifurcation pts

Phil Silva

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:00:29 +0000

50 lines

Re: High bifurcation pts

Bill

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:34:23 -0500

49 lines

Re: High bifurcation pts

K. Beach

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:17:35 -0800

146 lines

Re: High bifurcation pts

Terry Zwakenberg

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:05:52 -0600

354 lines

New Thread

high window boys

high window boys

Elizabeth Gault

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:53:28 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

IDTF

IDTF

Ann Marie Kupinski

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:55:52 -0500

155 lines

Re: IDTF

ROBERT KANE

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:56:16 -0500

128 lines

New Thread

impression reports

impression reports

Kristy Peeler

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:05:41 -0700

16 lines

Re: impression reports

Myers, Ruth

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:43:18 -0500

196 lines

Re: impression reports

JDS

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:21:51 +0000

42 lines

Re: impression reports

Mary Ann Wilson

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:25:23 -0500

46 lines

Re: impression reports

Andrew Bebry

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:04:32 -0500

30 lines

Re: impression reports

Kristy Peeler

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:18:54 -0700

34 lines

New Thread

IVC Filter

IVC Filter

Doug Marcum

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 15:39:24 -0500

26 lines

Re: IVC Filter

backupplan1613

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:22:14 -0500

64 lines

New Thread

Jobs

Jobs

angela tsiaknis

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 15:19:19 -0800

32 lines

Re: Jobs

Nancy Williams

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 11:26:47 -0500

199 lines

New Thread

LE Post-Stent Criteria

LE Post-Stent Criteria

Michele Robinson

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:26:16 -0500

60 lines

New Thread

Looking for RVT in Stuart, FL area

Looking for RVT in Stuart, FL area

Bill Bertolino

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:51:19 -0500

13 lines

Re: Looking for RVT in Stuart, FL area

Janice Giuca

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:44:25 -0500

61 lines

Re: Looking for RVT in Stuart, FL area

Bill Bertolino

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:37:26 -0500

23 lines

Re: Looking for RVT in Stuart, FL area

Paula Gehr

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:18:23 -0800

54 lines

Re: Looking for RVT in Stuart, FL area

Bill Bertolino

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:35:19 -0500

17 lines

Re: Looking for RVT in Stuart, FL area

Paula Gehr

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:54:32 -0800

59 lines

Re: Looking for RVT in Stuart, FL area

Bill Beymer

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:05:46 -0500

418 lines

New Thread

Matt S

Matt S

Doug

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:10:04 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter

Re: Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter

Johnson, Bill

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:44:37 -0800

108 lines

Re: Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter

Cynthia Shillingsburg

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:00:18 -0500

213 lines

New Thread

PADnet

PADnet

Estes, Kelly M

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:32:51 -0500

78 lines

Re: PADnet

Kristy Kirchofer

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:05:17 -0800

74 lines

Re: PADnet

JOHN YOKEMICK

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:06:54 -0500

142 lines

Re: PADnet

Amy BROWN

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:09:46 -0700

188 lines

Re: PADnet

Yeung Wen

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:12:20 -0500

194 lines

New Thread

Philips HD15

Philips HD15

Barb B. Lemon

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:15:31 -0600

116 lines

Re: Philips HD15

Connie McCoy

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:23:40 -0500

16 lines

Re: Philips HD15

Nancy Hohn

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 07:46:08 -0600

30 lines

Re: Philips HD15

Norma Vandenberghe

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:29:56 -0800

226 lines

Re: Philips HD15

Roy Kaup

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:12:09 -0800

120 lines

Re: Philips HD15

Norma Vandenberghe

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:10:06 -0800

145 lines

New Thread

Popliteal Aneurysm

Popliteal Aneurysm

Kathy Nardini

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:14:47 -0800

15 lines

Re: Popliteal Aneurysm

Smith, Matthew G.

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:33:06 -0500

38 lines

Re: Popliteal Aneurysm

Ann Marie Kupinski

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:35:52 -0500

60 lines

Re: Popliteal Aneurysm

Boyd, Nicole

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:38:03 -0500

42 lines

Re: Popliteal Aneurysm

Connie McCoy

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:49:49 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

portable exam reimbursement.....

portable exam reimbursement.....

Kristy Peeler

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 08:53:00 -0600

101 lines

Re: portable exam reimbursement.....

Smith, Matthew G.

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:05:15 -0500

176 lines

Re: portable exam reimbursement.....

Kristy Peeler

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:29:21 -0600

302 lines

Re: portable exam reimbursement.....

Franklin W. West

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 07:20:58 -0800

272 lines

Re: portable exam reimbursement.....

Kristy Peeler

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:37:02 -0600

418 lines

Re: portable exam reimbursement.....

Smith, Matthew G.

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:36:16 -0500

419 lines

Re: portable exam reimbursement.....

Steve Knight

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 12:42:40 -0500

369 lines

FW: portable exam reimbursement.....

Franklin W. West

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:23:32 -0800

394 lines

New Thread

portable testing....

portable testing....

Kristy Peeler

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 13:40:10 -0600

100 lines

Re: portable testing....

Steve Knight

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:03:25 -0500

122 lines

Re: portable testing....

Kristy Peeler

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:55:10 -0600

332 lines

Re: portable testing....

Steve Knight

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:18:04 -0500

339 lines

New Thread

post processing capability

post processing capability

Steve Knight

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 16:27:19 -0500

57 lines

Re: post processing capability

Terry Zwakenberg

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 15:32:43 -0600

89 lines

Re: post processing capability

Smith, Matthew G.

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:17:19 -0500

200 lines

Re: post processing capability

Dhanjil, Surinder

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:20:46 -0000

355 lines

New Thread

Quarter of stroke survivors die within a year:study

Quarter of stroke survivors die within a year:study

Steve Knight

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:34:14 -0500

71 lines

Re: Quarter of stroke survivors die within a year:study

Cynthia Shillingsburg

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:27:08 -0500

109 lines

New Thread

refurb vendors/facilities in need of probes

refurb vendors/facilities in need of probes

Estes, Kelly M

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:39:47 -0500

83 lines

New Thread

Register NOW for SVU's RPVI Exam Review Course

Register NOW for SVU's RPVI Exam Review Course

Frankie Hamme

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 12:41:33 -0500

67 lines

Re: Register NOW for SVU's RPVI Exam Review Course

Peterson, Debra

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:15:15 -0500

76 lines

Re: Register NOW for SVU's RPVI Exam Review Course

Barb B. Lemon

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:41:30 -0600

92 lines

New Thread

Renal art duplex

Renal art duplex

Barb B. Lemon

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:54:40 -0600

124 lines

Re: Renal art duplex

Jim Mosley

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:03:17 +0000

104 lines

Re: Renal art duplex

Smith, Matthew G.

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:07:47 -0500

260 lines

Re: Renal art duplex

<>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:31:00 -0500

260 lines

Re: Renal art duplex

Kathy Munson

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:25:30 -0500

161 lines

Re: Renal art duplex

Bill Schroedter

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:34:38 -0500

214 lines

Re: Renal art duplex

Smith, Matthew G.

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:35:39 -0500

361 lines

Re: Renal art duplex

John Kelleher

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:36:15 -0800

425 lines

New Thread

Renal Scanning on Newborns

Renal Scanning on Newborns

Wanda Ramos

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:04:56 -0500

258 lines

Re: Renal Scanning on Newborns

Barton Bean

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:14:31 -0800

188 lines

New Thread

selling of used machine

selling of used machine

Liane Boozel

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:31:05 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

SMA/Mesenteric study

SMA/Mesenteric study

Connie McCoy

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:12:46 -0500

18 lines

Re: SMA/Mesenteric study

<>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:50:24 EST

97 lines

Re: SMA/Mesenteric study

Barton Bean

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:33:56 -0800

126 lines

Re: SMA/Mesenteric study

<>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:39:42 EST

186 lines

Re: SMA/Mesenteric study

Sacco, Marie (GE Healthcare)

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:53:41 -0500

168 lines

Re: SMA/Mesenteric study

Connie McCoy

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:59:18 -0500

16 lines

Re: SMA/Mesenteric study

<>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:59:39 EST

187 lines

Re: SMA/Mesenteric study

Sacco, Marie (GE Healthcare)

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:10:12 -0500

267 lines

Re: SMA/Mesenteric study

Sacco, Marie (GE Healthcare)

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:10:49 -0500

40 lines

Re: SMA/Mesenteric study

Bonnie Johnson

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:16:30 -0800

249 lines

Re: SMA/Mesenteric study

Phil Silva

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:24:49 -0500

173 lines

Re: SMA/Mesenteric study

<>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:26:36 -0500

51 lines

Re: SMA/Mesenteric study

Barton Bean

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:27:58 -0800

225 lines

Re: SMA/Mesenteric study

<>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:14:06 -0500

267 lines

Re: SMA/Mesenteric study

Poe, Patricia (poepa)

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:43:47 -0500

340 lines

Re: SMA/Mesenteric study

Bill

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:35:27 -0500

33 lines

Re: SMA/Mesenteric study

Elizabeth Gault

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:14:04 +0000

42 lines

Re: SMA/Mesenteric study

Connie McCoy

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:51:16 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

SVU Announces New Mentoring Program

SVU Announces New Mentoring Program

Frankie Hamme

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:01:17 -0500

154 lines

New Thread

TCD scanning for children with sickle cell disease

TCD scanning for children with sickle cell disease

Matt Smith

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 13:54:41 -0500

15 lines

Re: TCD scanning for children with sickle cell disease

Denise Levy

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:03:21 -0800

43 lines

Re: TCD scanning for children with sickle cell disease

Karen Limone

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:17:36 -0500

116 lines

Re: TCD scanning for children with sickle cell disease

Fex, Beverly

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:28:06 -0500

44 lines

Re: TCD scanning for children with sickle cell disease

Smith, Matthew G.

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:42:44 -0500

275 lines

Re: TCD scanning for children with sickle cell disease

<>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:45:20 -0500

77 lines

Re: TCD scanning for children with sickle cell disease

Denise Levy

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:53:31 -0800

88 lines

Re: TCD scanning for children with sickle cell disease

Karen Limone

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:28:46 -0500

280 lines

Re: TCD scanning for children with sickle cell disease

Adrien Boutin

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:37:23 -0500

31 lines

Re: TCD scanning for children with sickle cell disease

Connie McCoy

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 22:43:22 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

THANK YOU ALL!

THANK YOU ALL!

Arleen Laboy

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:02:15 -0800

62 lines

New Thread

The bad dream

The bad dream

Don Ridgway

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:23:06 -0800

25 lines

Re: The bad dream

Myers, Ruth

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 13:34:10 -0500

39 lines

Re: The bad dream

Giselle Barnes BS,RVT

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:18:13 -0500

130 lines

Re: The bad dream

Denise Levy

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:29:41 -0800

173 lines

Re: The bad dream

Arleen LaBoy

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 12:29:36 -0800

204 lines

Re: The bad dream

Paul English

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:12:32 -0500

84 lines

Re: The bad dream

Steve Knight

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:21:03 -0500

105 lines

Re: The bad dream

Andrew Bebry

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:22:48 -0500

73 lines

Re: The bad dream

Paul English

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:23:53 -0500

202 lines

Re: The bad dream

Michael Savage

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:13:41 -0800

50 lines

Re: The bad dream

Doug Marcum

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 18:50:33 -0500

133 lines

Re: The bad dream

Sacco, Marie (GE Healthcare)

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 19:20:11 -0500

251 lines

Re: The bad dream

Don Ridgway

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:57:10 -0800

73 lines

Re: The bad dream

Robin Garza

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 19:14:10 -0600

74 lines

Re: The bad dream

Chris

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 02:20:53 +0000

52 lines

Re: The bad dream

SC

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 09:21:22 -0800

185 lines

Re: The bad dream

Lisa Mekenas

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 06:42:10 -0800

89 lines

Re: The bad dream

Don Ridgway

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:49:27 -0800

121 lines

Re: The bad dream

Don Ridgway

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:26:07 -0800

141 lines

Re: The bad dream

Denise Levy

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:34:24 -0800

237 lines

Re: The bad dream

Nancy Williams

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:54:45 -0500

159 lines

Re: The bad dream

Elizabeth Gault

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 19:52:40 +0000

37 lines

Re: The bad dream

Milburn, Donald T (GE Healthcare)

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:31:31 -0500

62 lines

Re: The bad dream

Don Ridgway

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:41:26 -0800

45 lines

Re: The bad dream

Doug Marcum

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:48:35 -0500

82 lines

Re: The bad dream

Don Ridgway

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:56:39 -0800

32 lines

Re: The bad dream

Betty-Sue/Elizabeth

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:49:52 -0500

89 lines

Re: The bad dream

Don Ridgway

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:23:43 -0800

73 lines

New Thread

unsubscribe

unsubscribe

Cindy

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:25:35 -0600

44 lines

New Thread

US guided foam sclerotherapy for varicose veins

US guided foam sclerotherapy for varicose veins

Joe Lopez

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 22:05:11 -0500

17 lines

Re: US guided foam sclerotherapy for varicose veins

Doug Marcum

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 13:00:27 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

USED MACHINE

USED MACHINE

Liane Boozel

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:59:10 -0500

32 lines

Re: USED MACHINE

Holly Bazarnick

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:17:42 -0500

60 lines

Re: USED MACHINE

Mina Tohid

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:08:36 -0800

64 lines

Re: USED MACHINE

Bachman, Andrew

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:48:07 -0500

146 lines

Re: USED MACHINE

Cynthia Shillingsburg

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:38:07 -0500

159 lines

Re: USED MACHINE

Connie McCoy

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:44:07 -0500

15 lines

Re: USED MACHINE

Liane Boozel

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:34:30 -0500

40 lines

Re: USED MACHINE

Bachman, Andrew

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:55:13 -0500

97 lines

New Thread

vascular lab hospital coverage

vascular lab hospital coverage

Janice Giuca

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:18:11 -0500

34 lines

Re: vascular lab hospital coverage

Steve Knight

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:37:56 +0000

34 lines

Re: vascular lab hospital coverage

Kathy Munson

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:22:01 -0500

155 lines

New Thread

Vascular Lab Study indications

Re: Vascular Lab Study indications

Jeffrey Yarus

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:53:28 -0500

418 lines

Re: Vascular Lab Study indications

Smith, Matthew G.

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:09:00 -0500

230 lines

Re: Vascular Lab Study indications

Jack Siegel

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:15:21 +0000

262 lines

Re: Vascular Lab Study indications

Jim Mosley

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:15:50 +0000

264 lines

Re: Vascular Lab Study indications

Estes, Kelly M

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:42:54 -0500

171 lines

Re: Vascular Lab Study indications

Smith, Matthew G.

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:38:02 -0500

337 lines

Re: Vascular Lab Study indications

Estes, Kelly M

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:39:25 -0500

278 lines

Re: Vascular Lab Study indications

Jack Siegel

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:04:19 +0000

218 lines

Re: Vascular Lab Study indications

Mary Samocha

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:55:46 -0500

372 lines

Re: Vascular Lab Study indications

Laurie Smith

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:57:49 -0500

244 lines

Re: Vascular Lab Study indications

Franklin W. West

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:17:05 -0800

460 lines

New Thread

Vascular Laboratory quality "indicators"

Vascular Laboratory quality "indicators"

Norman Paley

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:28:04 -0600

18 lines

Re: Vascular Laboratory quality "indicators"

Janice Giuca

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:04:17 -0500

92 lines

Re: Vascular Laboratory quality "indicators"

Smith, Matthew G.

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:23:14 -0500

39 lines

Re: Vascular Laboratory quality "indicators"

John Kelleher

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:31:05 -0800

413 lines

Re: Vascular Laboratory quality "indicators"

JASON r

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:42:05 -0800

335 lines

New Thread

venous reflux testing

venous reflux testing

Kristy Kirchofer

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:29:25 -0800

37 lines

Re: venous reflux testing

Sue Ovel

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:27:10 -0800

100 lines

Re: venous reflux testing

Doug

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:31:19 -0500

107 lines

Re: venous reflux testing

Sue Ovel

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:02:17 -0800

195 lines

New Thread

[Suspected Spam] Re: Vascular Laboratory quality "indicators"

Re: [Suspected Spam] Re: Vascular Laboratory quality "indicators"

Nancy Hohn

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:20:16 -0600

63 lines

Re: [Suspected Spam] Re: Vascular Laboratory quality "indicators"

Smith, Matthew G.

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:40:56 -0500

77 lines

Re: [Suspected Spam] Re: Vascular Laboratory quality "indicators"

Connie McCoy

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:01:41 -0500

15 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager