|
|
|
Size
|
2011 ARDMS & CCI Registry Reviews - ESP Ultrasound - LAST CALL
|
Ginger Rey |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:30:29 -0400 |
30 lines |
2011 RPVI Exam Review - October 22-23, 2011 - Newark, NJ - ESP Ultrasound
|
Ginger Rey |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:31:34 -0400 |
52 lines |
8RE: Color flow sensitivity
|
Bill Schroedter |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:51:01 -0400 |
239 lines |
A rant I guess...
|
Gina Johnson |
Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:41:26 -0400 |
113 lines |
Re: A rant I guess...
|
JASON r |
Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:20:19 -0400 |
133 lines |
Re: A rant I guess...
|
Kay Yost |
Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:20:18 -0600 |
47 lines |
Re: A rant I guess...
|
Dr. Fazeel |
Mon, 12 Sep 2011 05:54:49 +0500 |
140 lines |
Re: A rant I guess...
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Sun, 11 Sep 2011 20:02:46 -0700 |
258 lines |
Re: A rant I guess...
|
Card,Jason |
Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:13:25 -0700 |
310 lines |
Re: A rant I guess...
|
Doug Marcum |
Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:47:51 -0400 |
305 lines |
Re: A rant I guess...
|
Kevin Mackey |
Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:00:40 -0600 |
149 lines |
Re: A rant I guess...
|
JASON r |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 07:24:41 -0400 |
177 lines |
Re: A rant I guess...
|
Bill Schroedter |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:44:15 -0400 |
241 lines |
A rant, I guess, but I am very scared.
|
Bill Johnson |
Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:45:02 -0700 |
184 lines |
Re: A rant, I guess, but I am very scared.
|
JASON r |
Sun, 11 Sep 2011 00:00:28 -0400 |
210 lines |
Re: A rant, I guess, but I am very scared.
|
Bill Johnson |
Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:52:32 -0700 |
391 lines |
Re: A rant, I guess, but I am very scared.
|
Terry Zwakenberg |
Sun, 11 Sep 2011 06:26:37 -0500 |
346 lines |
Re: A rant, I guess, but I am very scared.
|
Diana |
Sun, 11 Sep 2011 06:50:09 -0700 |
316 lines |
Re: AAA
|
Dr. Fazeel |
Mon, 12 Sep 2011 06:27:44 +0500 |
64 lines |
Re: AAA
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:02:17 -0700 |
106 lines |
ABI interpretation criteria
|
Jeff Stanley |
Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:02:04 -0500 |
259 lines |
Re: ABI interpretation criteria
|
Andrew Bebry |
Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:51:02 -0400 |
160 lines |
ABI Sensitivity
|
Stacey Kincaid |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:39:02 -0400 |
24 lines |
Best Practices
|
Norma Bourne |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 11:23:21 -0400 |
103 lines |
Bob Martin
|
crash bandicoot |
Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:39:37 +1000 |
26 lines |
Re: Bob Martin
|
James Moor |
Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:02:16 -0700 |
54 lines |
Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound
|
Jeff Stanley |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 07:46:43 -0500 |
120 lines |
Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound
|
Renee Delong |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:44:20 +0000 |
201 lines |
Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound
|
Doug Marcum |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:44:50 -0400 |
125 lines |
Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound
|
JASON r |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:45:57 -0400 |
125 lines |
Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound
|
Doug Marcum |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:12:34 -0400 |
67 lines |
Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound
|
JASON r |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:06:11 -0400 |
83 lines |
Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound
|
Atlantic Imaging |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:43:15 +0000 |
211 lines |
Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound
|
Atlantic Imaging |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:44:51 +0000 |
212 lines |
Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound
|
Doug Marcum |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:55:57 -0400 |
100 lines |
Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:10:18 -0700 |
132 lines |
Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound
|
JASON r |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:13:10 -0400 |
221 lines |
Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound
|
JASON r |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:14:15 -0400 |
114 lines |
Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound
|
Jeff Stanley |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:11:00 -0500 |
260 lines |
Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound
|
Mina Tohid |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:31:11 -0700 |
100 lines |
CME nonsense and the ARRT
|
Nancy Williams |
Sat, 24 Sep 2011 17:06:00 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: CME nonsense and the ARRT
|
Patricia Cash |
Sat, 24 Sep 2011 16:20:04 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: CME nonsense and the ARRT
|
Doug Marcum |
Sat, 24 Sep 2011 17:43:15 -0400 |
93 lines |
Re: CME nonsense and the ARRT
|
Sal Nicolette |
Sat, 24 Sep 2011 19:42:09 -0400 |
266 lines |
Re: CME nonsense and the ARRT
|
kelly |
Sat, 24 Sep 2011 23:49:25 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: CME nonsense and the ARRT
|
Tom Hargens |
Sat, 24 Sep 2011 22:04:41 -0400 |
75 lines |
Re: CME nonsense and the ARRT
|
krista smith |
Sun, 25 Sep 2011 17:52:31 -0700 |
179 lines |
Re: CME nonsense and the ARRT
|
Thomas Vallot |
Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:49:47 +0000 |
245 lines |
Re: CME nonsense and the ARRT
|
Nancy Williams |
Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:31:36 -0400 |
151 lines |
Re: CME nonsense and the ARRT
|
Nancy Williams |
Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:28:54 -0400 |
230 lines |
Re: CME nonsense and the ARRT
|
kelly |
Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:55:31 +0000 |
151 lines |
CODING FOR GSV BYPASS PRE-OP
|
Chrystal L. Martin |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:55:47 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: CODING FOR GSV BYPASS PRE-OP
|
Renee Delong |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:16:28 +0000 |
52 lines |
Re: CODING FOR GSV BYPASS PRE-OP
|
Chrystal L. Martin |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:41:20 -0400 |
78 lines |
Color flow sensitivity
|
Claudia Benge |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:04:30 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re: Color flow sensitivity
|
Don Ridgway |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:20:52 -0700 |
61 lines |
Re: Color flow sensitivity
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:44:59 -0700 |
106 lines |
Re: Color flow sensitivity
|
Schneider, Joseph R. |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:27:42 -0500 |
57 lines |
Re: Color flow sensitivity
|
Claudia Benge |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:47:39 -0400 |
76 lines |
Re: Color flow sensitivity
|
Don Ridgway |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:36:55 -0700 |
120 lines |
Re: Color flow sensitivity
|
Michael Cuzzilla |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:26:53 +1000 |
23 lines |
Re: Color flow sensitivity
|
K. Beach |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:47:21 -0700 |
121 lines |
Re: Color flow sensitivity
|
Claudia Benge |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:17:25 -0400 |
16 lines |
Color flow sensitivity
|
Carol Gannon |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:29:38 -0500 |
115 lines |
Re: Color flow sensitivity
|
Claudia Benge |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:04:47 -0400 |
137 lines |
criteria for PPG/ICAVL
|
Kelly Estes |
Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:39:22 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: criteria for PPG/ICAVL
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Thu, 8 Sep 2011 23:52:30 -0700 |
83 lines |
Re: criteria for PPG/ICAVL
|
Don Ridgway |
Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:15:15 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: criteria for PPG/ICAVL
|
kelly |
Fri, 9 Sep 2011 18:32:26 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: criteria for PPG/ICAVL
|
Chris RVT |
Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:04:31 -0400 |
17 lines |
Re: criteria for PPG/ICAVL
|
Mina |
Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:37:45 -0700 |
27 lines |
CW
|
Brian Wirick |
Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:00:53 -0400 |
19 lines |
Re: CW
|
Bill Johnson |
Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:38:20 -0700 |
212 lines |
Re: CW
|
Terry Zwakenberg |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 05:58:06 -0500 |
154 lines |
Re: CW
|
Nicole Ball |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 07:46:22 -0400 |
171 lines |
Re: CW
|
Nancy Hohn |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:20:34 -0500 |
186 lines |
Re: CW
|
Smith, Matthew G. |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:17:07 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: CW
|
Jodi Zannino, RVT |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:17:44 -0400 |
265 lines |
Re: CW
|
Nicole Ball |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:16:28 -0400 |
248 lines |
Re: CW
|
Brian Wirick |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:37:04 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: CW
|
Benge, Claudia |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:15:53 -0400 |
98 lines |
Re: CW
|
Smith, Matthew G. |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:27:10 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: CW
|
Connie McCoy |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:27:20 -0400 |
107 lines |
Re: CW
|
Terry Zwakenberg |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:33:36 -0500 |
80 lines |
Re: CW
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:42:56 -0700 |
110 lines |
Data
|
Terrence Case |
Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:41:51 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: Data
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:19:06 -0700 |
90 lines |
Re: Data
|
Schneider, Joseph R. |
Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:34:17 -0500 |
198 lines |
Data Source
|
Terrence Case |
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:35:28 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Data Source
|
Card,Jason |
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:44:14 -0700 |
86 lines |
Re: Data Source
|
Strickland, Brenda |
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:13:06 -0500 |
249 lines |
Docs ordering multiple exams on NP
|
Bonnie Buck |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:47:09 -0600 |
61 lines |
Re: Docs ordering multiple exams on NP
|
JASON r |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:32:38 -0400 |
98 lines |
Re: Docs ordering multiple exams on NP
|
Kelly Estes |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:21:14 -0400 |
115 lines |
Re: Docs ordering multiple exams on NP
|
Nancy Hohn |
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 06:24:44 -0500 |
253 lines |
Re: Docs ordering multiple exams on NP
|
Nathalie Garbani |
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:37:18 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: Docs ordering multiple exams on NP
|
Katrina Turner |
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:49:12 -0400 |
116 lines |
Re: Docs ordering multiple exams on NP
|
Josie Klapec |
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:55:14 +0000 |
168 lines |
Re: Docs ordering multiple exams on NP
|
Kimberly Higgins |
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:14:27 -0400 |
91 lines |
Re: Docs ordering multiple exams on NP
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:46:30 -0700 |
243 lines |
Re: Docs ordering multiple exams on NP
|
Bonnie Buck |
Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:12:26 -0600 |
351 lines |
Dr fazeel
|
Doug Marcum |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 12:31:47 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: Dr fazeel
|
Gigi |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:00:17 -0400 |
133 lines |
Re: Dr fazeel
|
Poe, Patricia (poepa) |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:12:03 -0400 |
138 lines |
Dumbfounded
|
Ramona |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:37:44 -0500 |
15 lines |
Re: Dumbfounded
|
Betty-Sue/Elizabeth |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:51:32 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: Dumbfounded
|
Pamela Cox-Brathwaite |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 22:08:45 +0000 |
30 lines |
Ergonomics revisited
|
Bill Johnson |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:45:51 -0700 |
103 lines |
Re: Ergonomics revisited
|
Dr. Fazeel |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:34:04 +0500 |
131 lines |
Re: Ergonomics revisited
|
Bill Johnson |
Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:07:33 -0700 |
196 lines |
Extracranial to intracranial bypass
|
Debbie Milliken |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:26:59 -0400 |
17 lines |
Re: Extracranial to intracranial bypass
|
Ann Marie Kupinski |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:14:49 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Extracranial to intracranial bypass
|
Schneider, Joseph R. |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:45:09 -0500 |
69 lines |
Re: Extracranial to intracranial bypass
|
Milliken, Debra K |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:54:05 -0400 |
68 lines |
extracranial-intracranial bypasses
|
Debbie Milliken |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:40:22 -0400 |
15 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Nicole Ball |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 08:17:29 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Doug Marcum |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 08:27:47 -0400 |
149 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Stephen Rooks |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 09:04:18 -0400 |
236 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Dhanjil, Surinder |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:10:39 +0000 |
360 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Haase, Craig K. |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 09:27:25 -0400 |
415 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Terrence Case |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:40:54 +0000 |
394 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Barb Lemon |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 08:43:05 -0500 |
416 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Doug Marcum |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:12:23 -0400 |
467 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Poe, Patricia (poepa) |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 11:34:01 -0400 |
338 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Bill Johnson |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:35:16 -0700 |
75 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Barton Bean |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:52:12 -0700 |
49 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Connie McCoy |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:28:01 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Gonsalves, Gail |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:55:32 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Dr. Fazeel |
Fri, 2 Sep 2011 03:36:48 +0500 |
152 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
DeeAnn Ripplinger |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 18:42:58 -0400 |
139 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Bill Johnson |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:54:12 -0700 |
228 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Doug Marcum |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 19:46:31 -0400 |
205 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 19:03:13 -0700 |
150 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
shamraiz khan |
Fri, 2 Sep 2011 21:56:43 -0700 |
142 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Ramona |
Sat, 3 Sep 2011 07:23:20 -0500 |
245 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
DeeAnn Ripplinger |
Sat, 3 Sep 2011 09:39:28 -0400 |
273 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Doug Marcum |
Sat, 3 Sep 2011 10:25:19 -0400 |
308 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Dr. Fazeel |
Sun, 4 Sep 2011 02:10:12 +0500 |
240 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
DeeAnn Ripplinger |
Sat, 3 Sep 2011 09:39:28 -0400 |
225 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Doug Marcum |
Sat, 3 Sep 2011 10:25:19 -0400 |
191 lines |
Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak
|
Nicole Ball |
Wed, 7 Sep 2011 09:28:12 -0400 |
159 lines |
Re: Help with Aorta studies and Renal/Renal Artery studies
|
Deidre Harpster |
Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:18:33 -0700 |
72 lines |
Re: Help with Aorta studies and Renal/Renal Artery studies
|
Sony Rashid |
Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:28:50 -0400 |
65 lines |
I DID IT!
|
Marie Sacco |
Tue, 6 Sep 2011 07:35:15 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: I DID IT!
|
Jose Serrat |
Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:00:54 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: I DID IT!
|
Doug Marcum |
Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:17:43 -0400 |
71 lines |
Re: I DID IT!
|
Jose Serrat |
Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:43:53 -0400 |
125 lines |
Re: I DID IT!
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:27:05 -0700 |
84 lines |
ICAVL submission Allens and Raynauds
|
Jennifer Konecny |
Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:42:09 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: ICAVL submission Allens and Raynauds
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:21:05 -0700 |
70 lines |
interlobular doppler angles..
|
Kimberly A Ellis |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:27:28 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: interlobular doppler angles..
|
Pamela Cox-Brathwaite |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 21:34:32 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: interlobular doppler angles..
|
Ann Marie Kupinski |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 21:12:51 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: interlobular doppler angles..
|
Nathalie Garbani |
Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:09:25 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: interlobular doppler angles..
|
kimberly perusek |
Sun, 4 Sep 2011 12:27:15 -0700 |
66 lines |
Lead Vascular Tech opening
|
Michael Savage |
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:02:06 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: Lead Vascular Tech opening
|
Barb Lemon |
Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:57:07 -0500 |
120 lines |
Re: Lead Vascular Tech opening
|
Michael Savage |
Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:59:05 -0700 |
118 lines |
Lead Vascular Tech opening in New Hampshire
|
Michael Savage |
Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:55:11 -0700 |
47 lines |
Need an RVT in Orange County/Calif
|
Lisa Mekenas |
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:51:36 -0700 |
130 lines |
Re: Need an RVT in Orange County/Calif
|
Nozad Koro |
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:26:04 -0700 |
225 lines |
NNEVS Fall Conference
|
Nicole Ball |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:18:47 -0400 |
108 lines |
Re: NNEVS Fall Conference
|
Bill Johnson |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:52:13 -0700 |
141 lines |
Payment from Promise Hospital
|
JANE PULIDO |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:11:54 -0700 |
58 lines |
Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Keith Mauney |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:07:50 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Doug Marcum |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:15:03 -0400 |
50 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:25:35 -0700 |
97 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Kerrie Cumming |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:31:45 -0700 |
111 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Terrence Case |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:35:36 +0000 |
99 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Don Ridgway |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:37:32 -0700 |
61 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Don Ridgway |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:43:08 -0700 |
85 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:52:47 -0700 |
128 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:00:50 -0700 |
140 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Bill Johnson |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:04:10 -0700 |
108 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Patrick Donnelly |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:21:45 -0400 |
165 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Doug Marcum |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:48:12 -0400 |
209 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Card,Jason |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:06:20 -0700 |
184 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Smith, Matthew G. |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:13:34 -0400 |
309 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Nathalie Garbani |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:22:22 -0400 |
101 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Doug Marcum |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:32:33 -0400 |
122 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Jeff Stanley |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:37:54 -0500 |
348 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Claudia Benge |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:55:42 -0400 |
130 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Nathalie Garbani |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:24:12 -0400 |
146 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Doug Marcum |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:46:59 -0400 |
166 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Carol Gannon |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:55:12 -0500 |
198 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Nancy Williams |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:09:38 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Nathalie Garbani |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:11:21 -0400 |
207 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:39:21 -0700 |
341 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Kay Yost |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:11:06 -0700 |
86 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Schneider, Joseph R. |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:36:17 -0500 |
269 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
K. Beach |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:15:35 -0700 |
277 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Bill Johnson |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 01:17:36 -0700 |
210 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
K. Beach |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 01:59:59 -0700 |
95 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Connie McCoy |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:57:38 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Bill Schroedter |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:16:07 -0400 |
158 lines |
Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:43:33 -0700 |
325 lines |
Position available
|
Cristie Westrate |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:02:27 -0400 |
17 lines |
Re: Position available
|
Kimberly Higgins |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:04:51 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: Position available
|
Frankie Hamme |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:15:41 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: Position available
|
Jeff Stanley |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:05:45 -0500 |
67 lines |
Prosolv and Zonare
|
Lisa Mekenas |
Fri, 9 Sep 2011 14:45:44 -0700 |
114 lines |
Re: Prosolv and Zonare
|
Don Ridgway |
Fri, 9 Sep 2011 15:23:24 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: Prosolv and Zonare
|
Lisa Mekenas |
Sat, 10 Sep 2011 09:08:41 -0700 |
51 lines |
PVICME Fall Schedule - Still Time to Register
|
Fields, Diane |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 23:42:40 +0000 |
388 lines |
Question about Mesenteric studies.
|
Chris RVT |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:38:06 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.
|
Kelly Estes |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:08:20 -0400 |
98 lines |
Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.
|
Bill Johnson |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:27:12 -0700 |
143 lines |
Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.
|
kelly |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 01:05:21 +0000 |
150 lines |
Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.
|
ajit athale |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:35:18 -0700 |
126 lines |
Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.
|
Bill Johnson |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:25:21 -0700 |
255 lines |
Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.
|
Jose Serrat |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:50:40 -0400 |
306 lines |
Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.
|
Smith, Matthew G. |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:27:08 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.
|
Jose Serrat |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:45:56 -0400 |
130 lines |
Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.
|
Smith, Matthew G. |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:31:33 -0400 |
348 lines |
Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.
|
Connie McCoy |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:33:06 -0400 |
80 lines |
Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.
|
Jose Serrat |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:09:53 -0400 |
277 lines |
Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.
|
Chris RVT |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:55:29 -0400 |
28 lines |
Raynaud's testing
|
Kimberly Higgins |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:48:39 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: Raynaud's testing
|
Lisa Mekenas |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:21:03 -0700 |
62 lines |
Re: Raynaud's testing
|
jamie swetnam |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:35:19 -0700 |
55 lines |
Re: Raynaud's testing
|
Smith, Matthew G. |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:43:41 -0400 |
334 lines |
Re: Raynaud's testing
|
Haase, Craig K. |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:53:26 -0400 |
82 lines |
Re: Raynaud's testing
|
Willis, Chris |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:31:50 -0400 |
89 lines |
Re: Raynaud's testing
|
Kimberly Higgins |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:29:45 -0400 |
177 lines |
Re: Raynaud's testing
|
Barb Lemon |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:29:10 -0500 |
201 lines |
reimbursement value comparing vascular to echo
|
Chris RVT |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:31:28 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: reimbursement value comparing vascular to echo
|
Steve Knight |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:25:48 -0400 |
74 lines |
Re: reimbursement value comparing vascular to echo
|
Chris RVT |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:44:57 -0400 |
15 lines |
Re: reimbursement value comparing vascular to echo
|
Ann Marie Kupinski |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:17:17 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: reimbursement value comparing vascular to echo
|
Steve Knight |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:16:22 -0400 |
170 lines |
Send Email to above address
|
Mina |
Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:21:08 -0700 |
16 lines |
Sitting ABI?
|
Don Ridgway |
Sat, 17 Sep 2011 12:19:16 -0700 |
22 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Steve Knight |
Sat, 17 Sep 2011 15:27:18 -0400 |
55 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
crash bandicoot |
Sun, 18 Sep 2011 09:36:51 +1000 |
77 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:30:27 -0700 |
114 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Terrence Case |
Sun, 18 Sep 2011 19:22:10 -0400 |
161 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:30:10 -0700 |
212 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Smith, Matthew G. |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:46:09 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Lisa Mekenas |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 06:34:11 -0700 |
42 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
JASON r |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:42:39 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Terry Zwakenberg |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:55:17 -0500 |
135 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Don Ridgway |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:54:05 -0700 |
94 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
K. Beach |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:34:19 -0700 |
104 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Don Ridgway |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:11:59 -0700 |
45 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Don Ridgway |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:16:21 -0700 |
79 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Harvey Wilson |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:25:40 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
[log in to unmask] |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:40:00 -0700 |
27 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Steve Knight |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:49:16 -0400 |
151 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:26:06 -0700 |
230 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Ajit Athale |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:21:26 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Don Ridgway |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 22:20:59 -0700 |
46 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
K. Beach |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:09:33 -0700 |
67 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
K. Beach |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:24:16 -0700 |
91 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Connie McCoy |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:29:11 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Steve Knight |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:15:43 -0400 |
157 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Betty-Sue/Elizabeth |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:08:11 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Connie McCoy |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:57:01 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Kelly Estes |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:34:21 -0400 |
121 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Joan P Baker |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:34:32 -0700 |
54 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:37:16 -0700 |
296 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Smith, Matthew G. |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:21:02 -0400 |
332 lines |
Re: Sitting ABI?
|
Bill Schroedter |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:06:27 -0400 |
381 lines |
SVU Legislative, Regulatory and Reimbursement Issues Conference
|
Frankie Hamme |
Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:58:39 -0400 |
54 lines |
Thank you Dr. Fazeel
|
Caroline Barker |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 23:25:03 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Thank you Dr. Fazeel
|
Bill Johnson |
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:00:26 -0700 |
175 lines |
Thyroid Pathology
|
Mina Tohid |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:29:09 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Thyroid Pathology
|
Elizabeth Werner |
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:32:23 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: Thyroid Pathology
|
Dr. Fazeel |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:24:45 +0500 |
90 lines |
Re: Thyroid Pathology
|
Terry |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:31:53 -0400 |
241 lines |
Re: Thyroid Pathology
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 05:10:47 -0700 |
170 lines |
Re: Thyroid Pathology
|
Mina |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 07:37:59 -0700 |
200 lines |
Re: Thyroid Pathology
|
Betty-Sue/Elizabeth |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:56:40 -0400 |
170 lines |
Transcranial imaging vs blind CPT codes
|
Jennifer Konecny |
Tue, 6 Sep 2011 11:44:56 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: Transcranial imaging vs blind CPT codes
|
Joseph Hughes |
Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:49:36 -0400 |
50 lines |
Re: Transcranial imaging vs blind CPT codes
|
Jennifer Konecny |
Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:52:42 -0500 |
92 lines |
Vascular Jeopardy Game question/ Northern New England Vascular Society Chapter mtg
|
Steve Knight |
Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:11:00 -0400 |
72 lines |
Re: Who can read?
|
Gloria Angles |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:20:07 -0500 |
173 lines |
Re: Who can read?
|
Nancy Williams |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:30:16 -0400 |
312 lines |
Re: Who can read?
|
Kathleen Palmieri |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:31:22 -0400 |
159 lines |
Re: Who can read?
|
Smith, Matthew G. |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:31:40 -0400 |
290 lines |
Re: Who can read?
|
Gloria Angles |
Fri, 23 Sep 2011 10:12:30 -0500 |
274 lines |
Re: Who can read?
|
JASON r |
Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:25:15 -0400 |
244 lines |
Re: Who can read?
|
Carolyn Semrow |
Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:06:34 -0700 |
206 lines |