LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for UVMFLOWNET Archives


UVMFLOWNET Archives

UVMFLOWNET Archives


September 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

2011 ARDMS & CCI Registry Reviews - ESP Ultrasound - LAST CALL (1 message)
2011 RPVI Exam Review - October 22-23, 2011 - Newark, NJ - ESP Ultrasound (1 message)
8RE: Color flow sensitivity (1 message)
A rant I guess... (10 messages)
A rant, I guess, but I am very scared. (5 messages)
AAA (2 messages)
ABI interpretation criteria (2 messages)
ABI Sensitivity (1 message)
Best Practices (1 message)
Bob Martin (2 messages)
Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound (14 messages)
CME nonsense and the ARRT (11 messages)
CODING FOR GSV BYPASS PRE-OP (3 messages)
Color flow sensitivity (11 messages)
criteria for PPG/ICAVL (6 messages)
CW (14 messages)
Data (3 messages)
Data Source (3 messages)
Docs ordering multiple exams on NP (10 messages)
Dr fazeel (3 messages)
Dumbfounded (3 messages)
Ergonomics revisited (3 messages)
Extracranial to intracranial bypass (4 messages)
extracranial-intracranial bypasses (1 message)
from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak (26 messages)
Help with Aorta studies and Renal/Renal Artery studies (2 messages)
I DID IT! (5 messages)
ICAVL submission Allens and Raynauds (2 messages)
interlobular doppler angles.. (5 messages)
Lead Vascular Tech opening (3 messages)
Lead Vascular Tech opening in New Hampshire (1 message)
Need an RVT in Orange County/Calif (2 messages)
NNEVS Fall Conference (2 messages)
Payment from Promise Hospital (1 message)
Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound (32 messages)
Position available (4 messages)
Prosolv and Zonare (3 messages)
PVICME Fall Schedule - Still Time to Register (1 message)
Question about Mesenteric studies. (13 messages)
Raynaud's testing (8 messages)
reimbursement value comparing vascular to echo (5 messages)
Send Email to above address (1 message)
Sitting ABI? (31 messages)
SVU Legislative, Regulatory and Reimbursement Issues Conference (1 message)
Thank you Dr. Fazeel (2 messages)
Thyroid Pathology (7 messages)
Transcranial imaging vs blind CPT codes (3 messages)
Vascular Jeopardy Game question/ Northern New England Vascular Society Chapter mtg (1 message)
Who can read? (7 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

UVMFLOWNET Home

UVMFLOWNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

2011 ARDMS & CCI Registry Reviews - ESP Ultrasound - LAST CALL

2011 ARDMS & CCI Registry Reviews - ESP Ultrasound - LAST CALL

Ginger Rey

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:30:29 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

2011 RPVI Exam Review - October 22-23, 2011 - Newark, NJ - ESP Ultrasound

2011 RPVI Exam Review - October 22-23, 2011 - Newark, NJ - ESP Ultrasound

Ginger Rey

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:31:34 -0400

52 lines

New Thread

8RE: Color flow sensitivity

8RE: Color flow sensitivity

Bill Schroedter

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:51:01 -0400

239 lines

New Thread

A rant I guess...

A rant I guess...

Gina Johnson

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:41:26 -0400

113 lines

Re: A rant I guess...

JASON r

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:20:19 -0400

133 lines

Re: A rant I guess...

Kay Yost

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:20:18 -0600

47 lines

Re: A rant I guess...

Dr. Fazeel

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 05:54:49 +0500

140 lines

Re: A rant I guess...

Carolyn Semrow

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 20:02:46 -0700

258 lines

Re: A rant I guess...

Card,Jason

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:13:25 -0700

310 lines

Re: A rant I guess...

Doug Marcum

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:47:51 -0400

305 lines

Re: A rant I guess...

Kevin Mackey

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:00:40 -0600

149 lines

Re: A rant I guess...

JASON r

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 07:24:41 -0400

177 lines

Re: A rant I guess...

Bill Schroedter

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:44:15 -0400

241 lines

New Thread

A rant, I guess, but I am very scared.

A rant, I guess, but I am very scared.

Bill Johnson

Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:45:02 -0700

184 lines

Re: A rant, I guess, but I am very scared.

JASON r

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 00:00:28 -0400

210 lines

Re: A rant, I guess, but I am very scared.

Bill Johnson

Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:52:32 -0700

391 lines

Re: A rant, I guess, but I am very scared.

Terry Zwakenberg

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 06:26:37 -0500

346 lines

Re: A rant, I guess, but I am very scared.

Diana

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 06:50:09 -0700

316 lines

New Thread

AAA

Re: AAA

Dr. Fazeel

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 06:27:44 +0500

64 lines

Re: AAA

Carolyn Semrow

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:02:17 -0700

106 lines

New Thread

ABI interpretation criteria

ABI interpretation criteria

Jeff Stanley

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:02:04 -0500

259 lines

Re: ABI interpretation criteria

Andrew Bebry

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:51:02 -0400

160 lines

New Thread

ABI Sensitivity

ABI Sensitivity

Stacey Kincaid

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:39:02 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

Best Practices

Best Practices

Norma Bourne

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 11:23:21 -0400

103 lines

New Thread

Bob Martin

Bob Martin

crash bandicoot

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:39:37 +1000

26 lines

Re: Bob Martin

James Moor

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:02:16 -0700

54 lines

New Thread

Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound

Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound

Jeff Stanley

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 07:46:43 -0500

120 lines

Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound

Renee Delong

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:44:20 +0000

201 lines

Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound

Doug Marcum

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:44:50 -0400

125 lines

Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound

JASON r

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:45:57 -0400

125 lines

Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound

Doug Marcum

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:12:34 -0400

67 lines

Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound

JASON r

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:06:11 -0400

83 lines

Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound

Atlantic Imaging

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:43:15 +0000

211 lines

Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound

Atlantic Imaging

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:44:51 +0000

212 lines

Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound

Doug Marcum

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:55:57 -0400

100 lines

Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound

Carolyn Semrow

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:10:18 -0700

132 lines

Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound

JASON r

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:13:10 -0400

221 lines

Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound

JASON r

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:14:15 -0400

114 lines

Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound

Jeff Stanley

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:11:00 -0500

260 lines

Re: Carotid and Thyroid Ultrasound

Mina Tohid

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:31:11 -0700

100 lines

New Thread

CME nonsense and the ARRT

CME nonsense and the ARRT

Nancy Williams

Sat, 24 Sep 2011 17:06:00 -0400

47 lines

Re: CME nonsense and the ARRT

Patricia Cash

Sat, 24 Sep 2011 16:20:04 -0500

59 lines

Re: CME nonsense and the ARRT

Doug Marcum

Sat, 24 Sep 2011 17:43:15 -0400

93 lines

Re: CME nonsense and the ARRT

Sal Nicolette

Sat, 24 Sep 2011 19:42:09 -0400

266 lines

Re: CME nonsense and the ARRT

kelly

Sat, 24 Sep 2011 23:49:25 +0000

47 lines

Re: CME nonsense and the ARRT

Tom Hargens

Sat, 24 Sep 2011 22:04:41 -0400

75 lines

Re: CME nonsense and the ARRT

krista smith

Sun, 25 Sep 2011 17:52:31 -0700

179 lines

Re: CME nonsense and the ARRT

Thomas Vallot

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:49:47 +0000

245 lines

Re: CME nonsense and the ARRT

Nancy Williams

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:31:36 -0400

151 lines

Re: CME nonsense and the ARRT

Nancy Williams

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:28:54 -0400

230 lines

Re: CME nonsense and the ARRT

kelly

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:55:31 +0000

151 lines

New Thread

CODING FOR GSV BYPASS PRE-OP

CODING FOR GSV BYPASS PRE-OP

Chrystal L. Martin

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:55:47 -0400

30 lines

Re: CODING FOR GSV BYPASS PRE-OP

Renee Delong

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:16:28 +0000

52 lines

Re: CODING FOR GSV BYPASS PRE-OP

Chrystal L. Martin

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:41:20 -0400

78 lines

New Thread

Color flow sensitivity

Color flow sensitivity

Claudia Benge

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:04:30 -0400

36 lines

Re: Color flow sensitivity

Don Ridgway

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:20:52 -0700

61 lines

Re: Color flow sensitivity

Carolyn Semrow

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:44:59 -0700

106 lines

Re: Color flow sensitivity

Schneider, Joseph R.

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:27:42 -0500

57 lines

Re: Color flow sensitivity

Claudia Benge

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:47:39 -0400

76 lines

Re: Color flow sensitivity

Don Ridgway

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:36:55 -0700

120 lines

Re: Color flow sensitivity

Michael Cuzzilla

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:26:53 +1000

23 lines

Re: Color flow sensitivity

K. Beach

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:47:21 -0700

121 lines

Re: Color flow sensitivity

Claudia Benge

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:17:25 -0400

16 lines

Color flow sensitivity

Carol Gannon

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:29:38 -0500

115 lines

Re: Color flow sensitivity

Claudia Benge

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:04:47 -0400

137 lines

New Thread

criteria for PPG/ICAVL

criteria for PPG/ICAVL

Kelly Estes

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:39:22 -0400

41 lines

Re: criteria for PPG/ICAVL

Carolyn Semrow

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 23:52:30 -0700

83 lines

Re: criteria for PPG/ICAVL

Don Ridgway

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:15:15 -0700

43 lines

Re: criteria for PPG/ICAVL

kelly

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 18:32:26 +0000

33 lines

Re: criteria for PPG/ICAVL

Chris RVT

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:04:31 -0400

17 lines

Re: criteria for PPG/ICAVL

Mina

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:37:45 -0700

27 lines

New Thread

CW

CW

Brian Wirick

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:00:53 -0400

19 lines

Re: CW

Bill Johnson

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:38:20 -0700

212 lines

Re: CW

Terry Zwakenberg

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 05:58:06 -0500

154 lines

Re: CW

Nicole Ball

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 07:46:22 -0400

171 lines

Re: CW

Nancy Hohn

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:20:34 -0500

186 lines

Re: CW

Smith, Matthew G.

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:17:07 -0400

33 lines

Re: CW

Jodi Zannino, RVT

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:17:44 -0400

265 lines

Re: CW

Nicole Ball

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:16:28 -0400

248 lines

Re: CW

Brian Wirick

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:37:04 -0400

29 lines

Re: CW

Benge, Claudia

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:15:53 -0400

98 lines

Re: CW

Smith, Matthew G.

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:27:10 -0400

54 lines

Re: CW

Connie McCoy

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:27:20 -0400

107 lines

Re: CW

Terry Zwakenberg

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:33:36 -0500

80 lines

Re: CW

Carolyn Semrow

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:42:56 -0700

110 lines

New Thread

Data

Data

Terrence Case

Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:41:51 +0000

37 lines

Re: Data

Carolyn Semrow

Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:19:06 -0700

90 lines

Re: Data

Schneider, Joseph R.

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:34:17 -0500

198 lines

New Thread

Data Source

Data Source

Terrence Case

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:35:28 +0000

40 lines

Re: Data Source

Card,Jason

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:44:14 -0700

86 lines

Re: Data Source

Strickland, Brenda

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:13:06 -0500

249 lines

New Thread

Docs ordering multiple exams on NP

Docs ordering multiple exams on NP

Bonnie Buck

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:47:09 -0600

61 lines

Re: Docs ordering multiple exams on NP

JASON r

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:32:38 -0400

98 lines

Re: Docs ordering multiple exams on NP

Kelly Estes

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:21:14 -0400

115 lines

Re: Docs ordering multiple exams on NP

Nancy Hohn

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 06:24:44 -0500

253 lines

Re: Docs ordering multiple exams on NP

Nathalie Garbani

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:37:18 -0400

59 lines

Re: Docs ordering multiple exams on NP

Katrina Turner

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:49:12 -0400

116 lines

Re: Docs ordering multiple exams on NP

Josie Klapec

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:55:14 +0000

168 lines

Re: Docs ordering multiple exams on NP

Kimberly Higgins

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:14:27 -0400

91 lines

Re: Docs ordering multiple exams on NP

Carolyn Semrow

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:46:30 -0700

243 lines

Re: Docs ordering multiple exams on NP

Bonnie Buck

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:12:26 -0600

351 lines

New Thread

Dr fazeel

Dr fazeel

Doug Marcum

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 12:31:47 -0400

62 lines

Re: Dr fazeel

Gigi

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:00:17 -0400

133 lines

Re: Dr fazeel

Poe, Patricia (poepa)

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:12:03 -0400

138 lines

New Thread

Dumbfounded

Dumbfounded

Ramona

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:37:44 -0500

15 lines

Re: Dumbfounded

Betty-Sue/Elizabeth

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:51:32 -0400

28 lines

Re: Dumbfounded

Pamela Cox-Brathwaite

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 22:08:45 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

Ergonomics revisited

Ergonomics revisited

Bill Johnson

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:45:51 -0700

103 lines

Re: Ergonomics revisited

Dr. Fazeel

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:34:04 +0500

131 lines

Re: Ergonomics revisited

Bill Johnson

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:07:33 -0700

196 lines

New Thread

Extracranial to intracranial bypass

Extracranial to intracranial bypass

Debbie Milliken

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:26:59 -0400

17 lines

Re: Extracranial to intracranial bypass

Ann Marie Kupinski

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:14:49 -0400

35 lines

Re: Extracranial to intracranial bypass

Schneider, Joseph R.

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:45:09 -0500

69 lines

Re: Extracranial to intracranial bypass

Milliken, Debra K

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:54:05 -0400

68 lines

New Thread

extracranial-intracranial bypasses

extracranial-intracranial bypasses

Debbie Milliken

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:40:22 -0400

15 lines

New Thread

from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Nicole Ball

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 08:17:29 -0400

56 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Doug Marcum

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 08:27:47 -0400

149 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Stephen Rooks

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 09:04:18 -0400

236 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Dhanjil, Surinder

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:10:39 +0000

360 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Haase, Craig K.

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 09:27:25 -0400

415 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Terrence Case

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:40:54 +0000

394 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Barb Lemon

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 08:43:05 -0500

416 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Doug Marcum

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:12:23 -0400

467 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Poe, Patricia (poepa)

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 11:34:01 -0400

338 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Bill Johnson

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:35:16 -0700

75 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Barton Bean

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:52:12 -0700

49 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Connie McCoy

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:28:01 -0400

32 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Gonsalves, Gail

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:55:32 -0400

34 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Dr. Fazeel

Fri, 2 Sep 2011 03:36:48 +0500

152 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

DeeAnn Ripplinger

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 18:42:58 -0400

139 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Bill Johnson

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:54:12 -0700

228 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Doug Marcum

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 19:46:31 -0400

205 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Carolyn Semrow

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 19:03:13 -0700

150 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

shamraiz khan

Fri, 2 Sep 2011 21:56:43 -0700

142 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Ramona

Sat, 3 Sep 2011 07:23:20 -0500

245 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

DeeAnn Ripplinger

Sat, 3 Sep 2011 09:39:28 -0400

273 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Doug Marcum

Sat, 3 Sep 2011 10:25:19 -0400

308 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Dr. Fazeel

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 02:10:12 +0500

240 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

DeeAnn Ripplinger

Sat, 3 Sep 2011 09:39:28 -0400

225 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Doug Marcum

Sat, 3 Sep 2011 10:25:19 -0400

191 lines

Re: from [log in to unmask] eid mubarak

Nicole Ball

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 09:28:12 -0400

159 lines

New Thread

Help with Aorta studies and Renal/Renal Artery studies

Re: Help with Aorta studies and Renal/Renal Artery studies

Deidre Harpster

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:18:33 -0700

72 lines

Re: Help with Aorta studies and Renal/Renal Artery studies

Sony Rashid

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:28:50 -0400

65 lines

New Thread

I DID IT!

I DID IT!

Marie Sacco

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 07:35:15 -0700

38 lines

Re: I DID IT!

Jose Serrat

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:00:54 -0400

59 lines

Re: I DID IT!

Doug Marcum

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:17:43 -0400

71 lines

Re: I DID IT!

Jose Serrat

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:43:53 -0400

125 lines

Re: I DID IT!

Carolyn Semrow

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:27:05 -0700

84 lines

New Thread

ICAVL submission Allens and Raynauds

ICAVL submission Allens and Raynauds

Jennifer Konecny

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:42:09 -0500

35 lines

Re: ICAVL submission Allens and Raynauds

Carolyn Semrow

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:21:05 -0700

70 lines

New Thread

interlobular doppler angles..

interlobular doppler angles..

Kimberly A Ellis

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:27:28 -0400

27 lines

Re: interlobular doppler angles..

Pamela Cox-Brathwaite

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 21:34:32 +0000

35 lines

Re: interlobular doppler angles..

Ann Marie Kupinski

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 21:12:51 -0400

43 lines

Re: interlobular doppler angles..

Nathalie Garbani

Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:09:25 -0400

53 lines

Re: interlobular doppler angles..

kimberly perusek

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 12:27:15 -0700

66 lines

New Thread

Lead Vascular Tech opening

Lead Vascular Tech opening

Michael Savage

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:02:06 -0700

28 lines

Re: Lead Vascular Tech opening

Barb Lemon

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:57:07 -0500

120 lines

Re: Lead Vascular Tech opening

Michael Savage

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:59:05 -0700

118 lines

New Thread

Lead Vascular Tech opening in New Hampshire

Lead Vascular Tech opening in New Hampshire

Michael Savage

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:55:11 -0700

47 lines

New Thread

Need an RVT in Orange County/Calif

Need an RVT in Orange County/Calif

Lisa Mekenas

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:51:36 -0700

130 lines

Re: Need an RVT in Orange County/Calif

Nozad Koro

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:26:04 -0700

225 lines

New Thread

NNEVS Fall Conference

NNEVS Fall Conference

Nicole Ball

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:18:47 -0400

108 lines

Re: NNEVS Fall Conference

Bill Johnson

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:52:13 -0700

141 lines

New Thread

Payment from Promise Hospital

Payment from Promise Hospital

JANE PULIDO

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:11:54 -0700

58 lines

New Thread

Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Keith Mauney

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:07:50 -0400

33 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Doug Marcum

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:15:03 -0400

50 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Carolyn Semrow

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:25:35 -0700

97 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Kerrie Cumming

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:31:45 -0700

111 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Terrence Case

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:35:36 +0000

99 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Don Ridgway

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:37:32 -0700

61 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Don Ridgway

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:43:08 -0700

85 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Carolyn Semrow

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:52:47 -0700

128 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Carolyn Semrow

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:00:50 -0700

140 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Bill Johnson

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:04:10 -0700

108 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Patrick Donnelly

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:21:45 -0400

165 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Doug Marcum

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:48:12 -0400

209 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Card,Jason

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:06:20 -0700

184 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Smith, Matthew G.

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:13:34 -0400

309 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Nathalie Garbani

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:22:22 -0400

101 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Doug Marcum

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:32:33 -0400

122 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Jeff Stanley

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:37:54 -0500

348 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Claudia Benge

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:55:42 -0400

130 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Nathalie Garbani

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:24:12 -0400

146 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Doug Marcum

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:46:59 -0400

166 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Carol Gannon

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:55:12 -0500

198 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Nancy Williams

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:09:38 -0400

27 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Nathalie Garbani

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:11:21 -0400

207 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Carolyn Semrow

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:39:21 -0700

341 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Kay Yost

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:11:06 -0700

86 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Schneider, Joseph R.

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:36:17 -0500

269 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

K. Beach

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:15:35 -0700

277 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Bill Johnson

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 01:17:36 -0700

210 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

K. Beach

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 01:59:59 -0700

95 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Connie McCoy

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:57:38 -0400

35 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Bill Schroedter

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:16:07 -0400

158 lines

Re: Please weigh in on this one: the potential detriment of hearing impairment in cardiovascular ultrasound

Carolyn Semrow

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:43:33 -0700

325 lines

New Thread

Position available

Position available

Cristie Westrate

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:02:27 -0400

17 lines

Re: Position available

Kimberly Higgins

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:04:51 -0400

46 lines

Re: Position available

Frankie Hamme

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:15:41 -0400

34 lines

Re: Position available

Jeff Stanley

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:05:45 -0500

67 lines

New Thread

Prosolv and Zonare

Prosolv and Zonare

Lisa Mekenas

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 14:45:44 -0700

114 lines

Re: Prosolv and Zonare

Don Ridgway

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 15:23:24 -0700

37 lines

Re: Prosolv and Zonare

Lisa Mekenas

Sat, 10 Sep 2011 09:08:41 -0700

51 lines

New Thread

PVICME Fall Schedule - Still Time to Register

PVICME Fall Schedule - Still Time to Register

Fields, Diane

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 23:42:40 +0000

388 lines

New Thread

Question about Mesenteric studies.

Question about Mesenteric studies.

Chris RVT

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:38:06 -0400

43 lines

Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.

Kelly Estes

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:08:20 -0400

98 lines

Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.

Bill Johnson

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:27:12 -0700

143 lines

Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.

kelly

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 01:05:21 +0000

150 lines

Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.

ajit athale

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:35:18 -0700

126 lines

Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.

Bill Johnson

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:25:21 -0700

255 lines

Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.

Jose Serrat

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:50:40 -0400

306 lines

Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.

Smith, Matthew G.

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:27:08 -0400

60 lines

Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.

Jose Serrat

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:45:56 -0400

130 lines

Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.

Smith, Matthew G.

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:31:33 -0400

348 lines

Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.

Connie McCoy

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:33:06 -0400

80 lines

Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.

Jose Serrat

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:09:53 -0400

277 lines

Re: Question about Mesenteric studies.

Chris RVT

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:55:29 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

Raynaud's testing

Raynaud's testing

Kimberly Higgins

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:48:39 -0400

42 lines

Re: Raynaud's testing

Lisa Mekenas

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:21:03 -0700

62 lines

Re: Raynaud's testing

jamie swetnam

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:35:19 -0700

55 lines

Re: Raynaud's testing

Smith, Matthew G.

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:43:41 -0400

334 lines

Re: Raynaud's testing

Haase, Craig K.

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:53:26 -0400

82 lines

Re: Raynaud's testing

Willis, Chris

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:31:50 -0400

89 lines

Re: Raynaud's testing

Kimberly Higgins

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:29:45 -0400

177 lines

Re: Raynaud's testing

Barb Lemon

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:29:10 -0500

201 lines

New Thread

reimbursement value comparing vascular to echo

reimbursement value comparing vascular to echo

Chris RVT

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:31:28 -0400

32 lines

Re: reimbursement value comparing vascular to echo

Steve Knight

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:25:48 -0400

74 lines

Re: reimbursement value comparing vascular to echo

Chris RVT

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:44:57 -0400

15 lines

Re: reimbursement value comparing vascular to echo

Ann Marie Kupinski

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:17:17 -0400

48 lines

Re: reimbursement value comparing vascular to echo

Steve Knight

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:16:22 -0400

170 lines

New Thread

Send Email to above address

Send Email to above address

Mina

Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:21:08 -0700

16 lines

New Thread

Sitting ABI?

Sitting ABI?

Don Ridgway

Sat, 17 Sep 2011 12:19:16 -0700

22 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Steve Knight

Sat, 17 Sep 2011 15:27:18 -0400

55 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

crash bandicoot

Sun, 18 Sep 2011 09:36:51 +1000

77 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Carolyn Semrow

Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:30:27 -0700

114 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Terrence Case

Sun, 18 Sep 2011 19:22:10 -0400

161 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Carolyn Semrow

Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:30:10 -0700

212 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Smith, Matthew G.

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:46:09 -0400

38 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Lisa Mekenas

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 06:34:11 -0700

42 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

JASON r

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:42:39 -0400

57 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Terry Zwakenberg

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:55:17 -0500

135 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Don Ridgway

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:54:05 -0700

94 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

K. Beach

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:34:19 -0700

104 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Don Ridgway

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:11:59 -0700

45 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Don Ridgway

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:16:21 -0700

79 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Harvey Wilson

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:25:40 -0400

44 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:40:00 -0700

27 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Steve Knight

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:49:16 -0400

151 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Carolyn Semrow

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:26:06 -0700

230 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Ajit Athale

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:21:26 -0400

29 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Don Ridgway

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 22:20:59 -0700

46 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

K. Beach

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:09:33 -0700

67 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

K. Beach

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:24:16 -0700

91 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Connie McCoy

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:29:11 -0400

49 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Steve Knight

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:15:43 -0400

157 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Betty-Sue/Elizabeth

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:08:11 -0400

22 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Connie McCoy

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:57:01 -0400

31 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Kelly Estes

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:34:21 -0400

121 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Joan P Baker

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:34:32 -0700

54 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Carolyn Semrow

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:37:16 -0700

296 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Smith, Matthew G.

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:21:02 -0400

332 lines

Re: Sitting ABI?

Bill Schroedter

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:06:27 -0400

381 lines

New Thread

SVU Legislative, Regulatory and Reimbursement Issues Conference

SVU Legislative, Regulatory and Reimbursement Issues Conference

Frankie Hamme

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:58:39 -0400

54 lines

New Thread

Thank you Dr. Fazeel

Thank you Dr. Fazeel

Caroline Barker

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 23:25:03 +0000

41 lines

Re: Thank you Dr. Fazeel

Bill Johnson

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:00:26 -0700

175 lines

New Thread

Thyroid Pathology

Thyroid Pathology

Mina Tohid

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:29:09 -0700

29 lines

Re: Thyroid Pathology

Elizabeth Werner

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:32:23 -0400

43 lines

Re: Thyroid Pathology

Dr. Fazeel

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:24:45 +0500

90 lines

Re: Thyroid Pathology

Terry

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:31:53 -0400

241 lines

Re: Thyroid Pathology

Carolyn Semrow

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 05:10:47 -0700

170 lines

Re: Thyroid Pathology

Mina

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 07:37:59 -0700

200 lines

Re: Thyroid Pathology

Betty-Sue/Elizabeth

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:56:40 -0400

170 lines

New Thread

Transcranial imaging vs blind CPT codes

Transcranial imaging vs blind CPT codes

Jennifer Konecny

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 11:44:56 -0500

40 lines

Re: Transcranial imaging vs blind CPT codes

Joseph Hughes

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:49:36 -0400

50 lines

Re: Transcranial imaging vs blind CPT codes

Jennifer Konecny

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:52:42 -0500

92 lines

New Thread

Vascular Jeopardy Game question/ Northern New England Vascular Society Chapter mtg

Vascular Jeopardy Game question/ Northern New England Vascular Society Chapter mtg

Steve Knight

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:11:00 -0400

72 lines

New Thread

Who can read?

Re: Who can read?

Gloria Angles

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:20:07 -0500

173 lines

Re: Who can read?

Nancy Williams

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:30:16 -0400

312 lines

Re: Who can read?

Kathleen Palmieri

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:31:22 -0400

159 lines

Re: Who can read?

Smith, Matthew G.

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:31:40 -0400

290 lines

Re: Who can read?

Gloria Angles

Fri, 23 Sep 2011 10:12:30 -0500

274 lines

Re: Who can read?

JASON r

Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:25:15 -0400

244 lines

Re: Who can read?

Carolyn Semrow

Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:06:34 -0700

206 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager