ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Rich Berger <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Nov 2006 12:48:02 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
We asked our Environmental Safety people for a recommendation when we were 
planning on using Carbon Monoxide and they provided us with a Nighthawk 
model KN-COPP-3. It works on 110 vac with battery backup.

Richard A. Berger
Washington University Medical School

On Thu, 9 Nov 2006 12:15:56 -0500, Jay Brandes <[log in to unmask]> 
wrote:

>Dear Isogeochemers- I was wondering if there has been any new advice on
>what kind of CO monitor to buy for a IRMS lab?  Looking back it seems
>like the advice was to go for an expensive unit that requires periodic
>calibration.  Is this thought to still be the case or can one get by
>with the cheaper units, and if so (or if not) what units are people
>happy with after having used them?
>Thanks in advance-Jay Brandes, Skidaway Institute of Oceanography
>=========================================================================

ATOM RSS1 RSS2