ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Robert Schneider <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:15:02 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Hey,

we are using a Finigan MAT 252 mass spectrometer to measure the 13C
isotopy on CO2. When I started to reproduce the results obtained by the
intern isodat software, I had a look to the raw data. Thus, to the
mass44, mass45 and mass46 signals in time. I recognized, that the time
intervals are not equidistant, although they are set to 0.25s. It seemed
to be dependent on the actual signal. If the signal is high, like when
measuring a peak, 0.25s is the normal time interval between two points.
If only background values are measured, the time interval often changes
to 0.26s. 
So, I would like to know, how the time column might be produced. Is it
an intern effect of the farraday cups and how often they can be read in
a certain accuracy, or does the computer-speed maybe influence the read
out time? I just want to figure out in which way I can trust this time
column and how the raw data are basically produced at all inside the
mass spectrometer.

Any help would be useful.

Thanks in advance.

respect,

Robert

ATOM RSS1 RSS2