| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Sender: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Date: |
Sat, 27 Sep 2008 07:38:28 -0400 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="utf-8" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear colleagues,
while fighting with water in my Delta V Adv connected to Trace GC via a
Combustion III interface, I have discovered something that needs to be
clarified to me.
I mean gas inlet manifold - or what is the proper name for it - 'trident' 1/4" SS
tube that feeds gas to the ion source.
I have tried to replace the original manifold to a right-angle bent 1/4" SS tube
from Swagelok (not electropolished..). My tube was 0.049" wall thickness
instead of 0.035" of Thermo one. After pumping down I have observed almost
2-fold decrease of the MS response, either to Ref Gas (CO2) or to standard
alkane mix. I know that in capillaries flow restriction is 4th power proportional
to their ID. So in this particular case increase in restriction should be 1.9 (the
same as I had), but actually I don't know if this statement is valid for pretty
short and wide tubes..
In addition, I have noticed that Thermo manifold has such a feature that outer
diameter of SS tube (from MS side) is slightly and precisely decreased (turned)
at the distance of ca. 1 cm from the tip. I have no idea why and if this is
important for gas flow.
Finally, is the insertion depth (ca. 7 cm) that important? i.e., if a 2-mm
deviation in either side could result in 2-fold signal decrease?
Anyway, if I would like to change the original trident-style manifold to a single-
inlet tube, would electropolished SS tube from Restek (cat. no. 22539) be
good enough?
Thank you and
warm regards,
Tim
*****************************
Tim Sobolevsky, PhD
Moscow Anti-Doping Centre
Russia
|
|
|