| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Sat, 27 Sep 2008 17:03:21 -0400 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
HI Tim--
If I got this right, it sounds l
Tim Sobolevsky wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> while fighting with water in my Delta V Adv connected to Trace GC via a
> Combustion III interface, I have discovered something that needs to be
> clarified to me.
>
> I mean gas inlet manifold - or what is the proper name for it - 'trident' 1/4" SS
> tube that feeds gas to the ion source.
>
> I have tried to replace the original manifold to a right-angle bent 1/4" SS tube
> from Swagelok (not electropolished..). My tube was 0.049" wall thickness
> instead of 0.035" of Thermo one. After pumping down I have observed almost
> 2-fold decrease of the MS response, either to Ref Gas (CO2) or to standard
> alkane mix. I know that in capillaries flow restriction is 4th power proportional
> to their ID. So in this particular case increase in restriction should be 1.9 (the
> same as I had), but actually I don't know if this statement is valid for pretty
> short and wide tubes..
>
> In addition, I have noticed that Thermo manifold has such a feature that outer
> diameter of SS tube (from MS side) is slightly and precisely decreased (turned)
> at the distance of ca. 1 cm from the tip. I have no idea why and if this is
> important for gas flow.
>
> Finally, is the insertion depth (ca. 7 cm) that important? i.e., if a 2-mm
> deviation in either side could result in 2-fold signal decrease?
>
> Anyway, if I would like to change the original trident-style manifold to a single-
> inlet tube, would electropolished SS tube from Restek (cat. no. 22539) be
> good enough?
>
> Thank you and
> warm regards,
>
> Tim
> *****************************
> Tim Sobolevsky, PhD
> Moscow Anti-Doping Centre
> Russia
>
>
|
|
|