Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Question on O2 purity and typical N2 background.
From:
Bruce Wegter <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 5 Dec 2008 14:21:48 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
We have a Costech EA, a Conflo III, and a Thermo Delta V Advantage 
I.R.M.S.  Currently using continuous flow for C13 and N15 determination on 
sediment core samples.  C13 analysis is very good.  N2 is the issue, our N2 
background is typically in the 26mV – 28mV range (on N28, cup 2), we have 
tried various grades of O2 combustion gas, from grade 4.5, 5.0 (< 5 ppm N2, 
batch tested), and now grade 6.0 (supposedly < 0.2ppm N2, also batch 
tested), with no change at all in the N2 background.  Note:  this background 
is present in blanks, (blank = no sample whatsoever, O2 injected, with auto 
sampler inhibited) as well as “empty” tin capsules, and of course samples and 
standards.  

We have (we believe) thoroughly leak checked the system with argon leak 
check techniques.  This identified a small leak at the water trap in the EA, 
which we promptly corrected.  No other leaks were identified, typical Ar40 on 
cup 3 reads < 70 mV (it has been lower than 60 mV).  All gas fittings, 
regulators, and lines from all gas cylinders were also checked, again no leaks 
were identified.  We plumbed He into the O2 line to see if N2 background 
would change with the He in the combustion line.  It did, N28 background was 
2mV – 3mV on cup 2 with He in place of O2.

Question 1:  Is our N2 background (~28mV) typical?  If not, what is?

Question 2:  What grade O2 should we use (and is grade 6.0 the “best”?)?  
Manual says grade 5.0 or better, we have seen no difference in N2 
background between 4.5, 5.0, and 6.0.  Should I request from my gas supplier 
a specific O2 cylinder which has been tested and certified to < 0.2ppm N2, 
not just batch tested?  Or, should I try a different supplier?  We have had no 
other issues with our current supplier.  I realize that cert’s can be wrong, and 
our O2 cylinder grades might not really be what they are supposed to be, but 
are we looking in the right direction, or barking up the wrong tree (as Mom 
used to say!).
Question 3:  What else could give us our N2 background?

Any help or direction would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you in advance.

Bruce Wegter
Sciences Instrumentation Technician
Geosciences Department
Hamilton College – Clinton, New York  13323
e-mail:  [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV