Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: m/z 30 in Isodat 2.0
From:
"Juan C. Marini" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:17:42 -0600
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
Dear Steve,

I remember having the same problem with the 30/28 ratio a few years back.
We solve it using a CO2 method, and then changing parameters, to force the
software to give us the third cup reading. By the way how do the 30/28
stability run looks like?

Regards

Juan




At 03:27 PM 11/19/2004 +0100, you wrote:
>Dear All,
>
>We've recently switched to Isodat 2.0 on one of our instruments, and since
>then we don't seem to be able to get out the m/z 30 data from when running
>N2. It is measured and integrated all right, but there is no option to
>select any of the m/z30 data (background, area, ratios,...) from the list
>of parameters when it's configured to N2 - not in the peak information
>that comes along with the chromatogram nor in the export templates.
>It might just be something trivial in the configuration but I don't
>immediately see what.
>Our instrument PC also boots under WinNT so we can still have IsodatNT
>controlling the same machine but I would like to get this solved so that
>we can stay under 2.0 for all our applications.
>
>Any ideas ?
>
>Thanks /
>Steven Bouillon
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_____________________________________________
><http://www.vub.ac.be/ANCH/CV/steven.html>Research and contact details
>_____________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV