ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Paul Eby <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:50:51 -0800
In-Reply-To:
<5.1.0.14.0.20041214114929.02b9c100@mailhost>
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-48A11901; boundary="=======4FFA2CD4======="
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (783 bytes)
Suzan,

Each column manufacturer will have a comparable column with similar
coating, and generally speaking all would meet the needs of the gas bench
application. I'm partial to the GSQ from J&W (now Agilent) because the
bonded phase is more stable than from other companies. That, however,
shouldn't be a huge issue in the GasBench, where the system isn't normally
fiddle with.

Paul Eby
University of Victoria


At 03:00 AM 12/14/2004, you wrote:

>Dear all,
>
>We are working on the Finnigan DeltaPlus with a gasbench. The capillary
>column needs to be replaced. The one we are using now is a Varian
>PLOT-fused silica (25m * 0.32 mm (ID)) with a poraplot-Q coating. I am
>curious to know what other kind of capillary column can be used for the
>Gasbench and if this makes a difference.
>
>Thanks
>
>Suzan
>



ATOM RSS1 RSS2