Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Date:
Wed, 6 Jul 2005 10:16:43 EDT
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Further Discussion on Carbonate Corrections
From:
"Anthony M. Faiia" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
MIME-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
--- You wrote:
How about analyzing two, known but very different isotopic composition of
carbonates (NBS-18 and NBS_19) determining the slope and additive
correction every day and forget about calibrating the reference gas.  That
is what we did Revesz-Landwehr 2002;  RCM, 16: 2102-2114.
--- end of quote ---

That is the procedure we use as well. Ideally the samples will fall between the two standard values.

Anthony Faiia
Dartmouth College

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV