Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU
Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home
Log In Log In
Register Register
Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe
Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v733)
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Continuous Flow IRMS + EA: Eager 300 vs Costech EAS?
From:
Ethan Goddard <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 20:24:57 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
Greetings isotopists!

If any one out there has had direct experience with both C-E Eager  
300 and Costech's EAS software for elemental analysis I'd love to  
hear about it.  Specifically, I am interested in hearing about the  
problems encountered and advantages/disadvantages with these two  
particular EA acquisition software packages running simultaneously w/  
Isodat (1.5 and/or 2.0) w/ Thermo IRMS instrumentation.

Many thanks,
Ethan Goddard

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV