Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:37:31 EDT |
Content-Disposition: |
inline |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Sue,
We had a very similar problem with our instrument (HP 5890 with GCCII. When running 15 compounds in an n-alkane standard, the last three or so d13C values would be off by 1-2 permil. The values were all accurate during the intial runs but after a month or so of running, the last values degraded. We thought this was due to leakage in the fittings at higher oven temperatures but now I believe it was the oxidation furnace. There was a noticeable tailing in the trace which was not there initially. Even though we tried to re-oxidize the furnace, the problem persisted. After replacing the oxidation tube, the tailing is gone.
Anthony
--- You wrote:
Hello All:
I am seeking any possible hints to solve a problem that has developed in our GC-IRMS system.
At the moment the suite of standards we run for d13C of FAMEs in order to check for consistency no longer exhibits a constant correction factor across all the compounds in each standard chromatogram which range from 14:0 through 23:0 in size. In fact we are seeing greater depletion in 13C for the longer (or later RT) FAMEs by as much as a few per mil relative to the first compounds (14:0). I have been trying to isolate the variables and this is what I've found so far:
1. Flow is constant throughout the entire GC run (2 mL/min).
2. CO2 injected throughout the run remains constant in it isotopic composition so does not exhibit the depletion see in compounds that must be combusted.
3. I figured it must be the combustion column so it has been replaced and we are again seeing the same problem.
4. Peak shape looks pretty good with widths remaining within 15-20s and fairly sharp ratio traces. The ratio traces do become a little broader with the last few more deplete compounds but not particularly worse than runs where we've gotten good consistent values.
We are using an Agilent (HP) 6890 GC with a split/splitless injector in splitless mode. I have changed the septa (done frequently anyway), liner, and the gold seal and washer. The GC column is very new but also has been cut (`0.5m) to see if reactive sites may have been a problem. We are using the metal Valco cross piece and have been now for years without a problem, could this have developed active sites that may yield such symptoms?
Thanks for any information anyone might have regarding this problem...I've been at this for some time now and am in danger of pulling out all my hair!
Best regards,
Sue
--- end of quote ---
|
|
|