Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 15 May 2006 13:08:27 -0600 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Weihong:
My two cents worth:
You didn't tell us if these are natural mineral samples or precipitates
from groundwater.
I prepare BaCO3 precipitates from water off line for the following
reasons. If you know the sulfate/carbonate content you can easily
calculate how much material to weigh out--either for combustion in an
EA or for acidification--if the material is dry. However, I worry
about absorption of atmospheric CO2 due to the high residual pH in the
system--whether dry or in a wet slurry.
As a result, I try to minimize contact time with atmosphere during all
stages of handling. I load a standard two-legged reaction vessel with
slurry, dry it under vacuum, acidify it, and run it by dual inlet.
I'm sure others will have other views.
On May 14, 2006, at 7:13 AM, CAT CAT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question here:
>
> Have any of you ever analyzed BaCO3 in your autoanalyzer? Is this
> possible and
> what are the constraints if any that you know of? Thanks.
>
> Have a nice day.
> Weihong
>
> Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great
> rates starting at 1¢/min.
--
*************************************************************
Steve Nelson
Associate Professor
Dept. of Geological Sciences
S-389 ESC
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
801-422-8688
"Guns don't kill people, Dick Cheney kills people."
**************************************************************
Disclaimer for the feeble-minded: It should be painfully obvious, but
the identification of my affiliation with Brigham Young University does
not imply that the University endorses any political or otherwise
partisan content of this message.
|
|
|