Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: AW: [ISOGEOCHEM] How do enriched samples affect reproducibility?
From:
Steve Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Feb 2007 08:01:45 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (75 lines)
Another tip:  Before running dD with the HDevice, perform all of the 
d18O analyses first.  This will allow you to place samples with similar 
dD values near one another in the sequence, thereby reducing the memory 
effect of one sample on the next.


On Feb 6, 2007, at 12:11 AM, Geldern, Robert van wrote:

> Hi Georges,
>
>> This has been described as "carryover" and "source conditioning",
>
> You may check the archives also for memory effect. We do not run a
> TC/EA with solid samples but see a similar effect for dD on
> the H/Device (water). This effect results from a "memory" of the last
> samples
> in your reactor, not in the MS. I have no clue if the source of this is
> the
> reactor filling or the glass walls of the reactor tube (or both).
>
> In genreal, you have three way to deal with this:
> 1) Inject your sample three times and discard the first (two?) values.
> (costs time and money)
> 2) Inoculate your reactor with one or two "dummy" injections of your
> sample before measuring it (saves time)
> 3) Run your samples in duplicates/triplicates and make a
> mathematical post run correction of the data by substruction of 0.5
> to 1% of the difference (jump) between your samples (n) and the
> sample before (n-1) and/or about 0.05% of the difference between (n)
> and (n-2). The acutal value of the percentages have to be determined
> in each run by looking at large jumps of your standards (e.g. SMOW-
>> GISP or house standards in this range).
>
> I can send you my excel speadsheets on request.
>
> regards,
> Robert
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Robert van Geldern
> Section 3: Geochronology and Isotope Hydrology
> Leibniz Institute for Applied Geosciences (GGA-Institute)
>
> GEOZENTRUM HANNOVER
> Stilleweg 2
> 30655 Hannover, Germany
>
> Phone: +49-(0)511-643-2313
> Fax: +49-(0)511-643-3665
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>
>
>
-- 
*************************************************************
Steve Nelson
Associate Professor
Dept. of Geological Sciences
S-389 ESC
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT  84602

801-422-8688

"Guns don't kill people, Dick Cheney kills people."
George W. Bush:  "Decider in Chief"
"Iraq burns.  We shop."  Bob Herbert
**************************************************************
Disclaimer for the feeble-minded:  It should be painfully obvious, but 
the identification of my affiliation with Brigham Young University does 
not imply that the University endorses any political or otherwise 
partisan content of this message.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV