Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Sulphur Analysis
From:
Shapna Mazumder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:16:18 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (59 lines)
Thank you Tim, Arnold and Rick for helping with the sulphur issue.  Changing 
the insert and water trap eliminated the peak broadening and retuning the 
source took care of the sensitivity issue.  Thanks again.
Regards,
Shapna
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Heaton, Timothy HE" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 6:47 AM
Subject: Re: [ISOGEOCHEM] Sulphur Analysis


> Shapna
>
> 900 mV <64> on 100ug S seems rather low. We typically get about 6000 mV
> on that amount of S (in the form of about 750ug BaSO4) on our
> EA-Delta+XL system.
>
> Tim H.E. Heaton
>
> NERC Isotope Geosciences Laboratory
> British Geological Survey
> Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, England
> (www.bgs.ac.uk/nigl/index.htm)
>
> Tel. +44(0)115 936 3401
> Email: [log in to unmask]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stable Isotope Geochemistry [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> Behalf Of Shapna Mazumder
> Sent: 27 February 2007 00:06
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [ISOGEOCHEM] Sulphur Analysis
>
> Hello All who do sulphur analysis,
> I have been running sulphur analysis on feathers using Bovine Liver as
> working standard on a Costech EA- Delta V Advantage. After running two
> dozen samples on a new combustion column and water trap the sulphur peak
> is broadening, which seems to be effecting the d34S by about 1 per mil
> (although the combustion hasn't been effected).  Reintegrating the
> chromatogram helps if I do them individually.  Two questions, what could
> be contributing to the peak broadening and in terms of source
> sensitivity what should I be getting on mass 64 for a sample containing
> 100ug S, presently I am getting ~900 mV for 100ug S.  Any help will be
> greatly appreciated.
> Thanks.
> Regards,
> Shapna
>
> ***************************************************************************************************************
> This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is 
> subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this 
> email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt 
> from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in 
> an electronic records management system.
> *************************************************************************************************************** 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV