Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
30 peak of cylinder N2
From:
Frank Simpson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:34:05 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Hello,                                             12th June 2008

     I'd like to present some data that I obtained yesterday with our Varian/Finnigan MAT 250.  These values are comparable with data from cylinder N2 that we obtained about ten years ago.

Peak ratios, corrected for backgrounds

N2 isotopes        Liquid N2 boil-off             Cylinder N2         Expected from Natural Abundance

29/28                 7.165 E-3                    7.126 E-3                     7.307 E-3
                    (0.981 x Nat. Abund.)   (0.975 x Nat. Abund.)

30/28                 2.406 E-4                    2.532 E-4                     1.335 E-5
                    (18.02 x Nat. Abund.)    (18.97 x Nat. Abund.)

30/29                 3.358 E-2                    3.553 E-2                      1.827 E-3
                    (18.38 x Nat. Abund.)     (19.45 x Nat. Abund.)


     It looks to me like we have a sizeable contaminant at mass 30.  At the risk of displaying our ignorance, might others have noticed similar, unexpected increases at mass 30 from liquid and cylinder nitrogen?  We are thinking to use FTMS to resolve what the contaminant might be (perhaps nitric oxide?), but as yet have not had opportunity to run the FTMS spectrum.


                                            Thank you, Frank Simpson


School of Pharmacy
Univ. Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin
tel: 1-608-265-2264
email: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV