Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Ceramic Columns on C+N EA?
From:
"Wassenaar,Len [NHRC]" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:18:07 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
After cooling and cracking another new quartz reactor column on the C+N
EA I am wondering if anyone has instead tried using thicker walled
ceramic columns normally used for pyrolysis?  Seems to me these are far
more robust and could be easily cleaned out and reused without the
filthy mess left by shattered qtz reactors? 

Anyone tested this? Pros, Cons?  

Len   


Leonard I. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
Stable Isotope Hydrology and Ecology Laboratory
Environment Canada
11 Innovation Blvd.
Saskatoon, SK
Canada S7N 3H5
tel (306) 975-5747
fax (306) 975-5143

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV