| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:00:09 +0100 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We are running CO2-water equilibrations on a Gasbench II+ Delta+XP and
in general have good results. We have noticed "fliers" with anomalously
heavy values in one or two recent runs and we wonder if anyone else has
seen this and knows a possible reason.
We equilibrate 0.5 mL water with 1%CO2-He mixture for 26 hours at room
temperature, with 88 analyses in a run. Every fourth analysis is for
the same lab standard water, and we use this to control for instrument
drift, which is about 0.5 per mille in d18O with a roughly diurnal
cycle. In our latest two runs we see single analyses that stand out
from this pattern, and are 1.5 - 2 per mille heavier vs the reference
gas than the standards before and after. Suspecting that this might be
a sporadic phenomenon that affected samples as well as standards we made
up a run consisting mostly of duplicates of previous analyses and found
about 10% of samples in the run showed similar positive anomalies when
compared with their earlier "true" values.
Anomalous analyses have completely normal chromatograms and excellent
internal precision. There is no drift in ref gas peaks, and signal
strength for both sample and refgas is normal. There is no sign of an
N2O peak preceding the CO2 peaks, which is normally a give-away for
contamination by atmospheric air. The contamination of the sample gas
would have to be huge to produce a 2 per mille anomaly in d18O of
headspace CO2, and this would also cause a large N2O signal produced by
reaction of N2 and O2 in the source.
Prior to all this we had performed about 1000 water analyses with
generally excellent precision (1 sd ~0.045 per mille for d18O, estimated
from the method of replicates and also from repeated analysis of a
single lab standard in every run.) However, looking back at the lab
notebook we notice that the same problem occurred in a single
preparatory run right at the beginning of this batch of work, in which
we just had repeated analyses of two waters. We never found out what
caused it and the problem did not repeat itself. We had some other
running repairs to make and forgot about it. Now it seems to have come
back.
Has anyone else experienced this pattern of sporadic anomalies, and
(hopefully) found the cause?
John Hill & Tim Atkinson,
Bloomsbury Environmental Isotope Facility,
University College London.
|
|
|