Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
unusual slope of calibration of standards
From:
Paul Eby <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 May 2009 10:32:22 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Listmembers,

Has anyone ever seen a calibration slope (known and measured values 
of two standards) deviate significantly from the expected 0.95 to 
1.05? We are consistently seeing 0.67.

This is a new Delta Advantage. d13C and d18O on a pair of OzTech CO2 
standards by dual inlet both have a slope of approximately 1, so the 
instrument is otherwise working fine (similar results by GasBench).

Hydrogen is a different story: a pair of OzTech standards by dual 
inlet has a consistent slope of 0.67, and SMOW/GISP/SLAP by H/Device 
shows similar results. H3 is consistently around 0.6, and the 
calibration performed on the H/Device seems stable enough that I 
could probably ignore the issue and run.

Any suggestions out there on how this could be?

Paul Eby


[log in to unmask]
Alberta Research Council

Vancouver Island Technology Park
3 - 4476 Markham St.
Victoria, BC, Canada V8Z 7X8

Phone: 250-483-3290
Fax:     250-483-1989    

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV