Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: unusual slope of calibration of standards
From:
Grzegorz Skrzypek <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Sun, 17 May 2009 21:47:06 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Dear Paul,
What is your d2H of reference gas in a tank?

I had similar problem in Texas with a tank delivered by BOC with 
extremely low d2H. Something  close to -800 permil, if I remember 
correctly. The slope was <0.7 on Delta Xp Plus. I did a few tests runing 
SMOW/GISP/SLAP and results were quite consistent. However, finally I 
decided to change hydrogen tank. New tank had about -150 and slope was 
as expected around 0.95.



Greg

-------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Grzegorz Skrzypek, Research Assistant Professor

West Australian Biogeochemistry Centre
John de Laeter Centre of Mass Spectrometry
School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia
35 Stirling Highway (MO90), Crawley WA 6009, Australia

Phone +61 8 6488 4584, Fax +61 8 64887925
email: [log in to unmask] http://www.bukibuki.eu





Paul Eby wrote:
> Listmembers,
>
> Has anyone ever seen a calibration slope (known and measured values of 
> two standards) deviate significantly from the expected 0.95 to 1.05? 
> We are consistently seeing 0.67.
>
> This is a new Delta Advantage. d13C and d18O on a pair of OzTech CO2 
> standards by dual inlet both have a slope of approximately 1, so the 
> instrument is otherwise working fine (similar results by GasBench).
>
> Hydrogen is a different story: a pair of OzTech standards by dual 
> inlet has a consistent slope of 0.67, and SMOW/GISP/SLAP by H/Device 
> shows similar results. H3 is consistently around 0.6, and the 
> calibration performed on the H/Device seems stable enough that I could 
> probably ignore the issue and run.
>
> Any suggestions out there on how this could be?
>
> Paul Eby
>
>
> [log in to unmask]
> Alberta Research Council
>
> Vancouver Island Technology Park
> 3 - 4476 Markham St.
> Victoria, BC, Canada V8Z 7X8
>
> Phone: 250-483-3290
> Fax:     250-483-1989   

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV