Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
18O vs. SMOW or vs. PDB?
From:
Francesca Serra <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Oct 2005 12:15:32 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Recently I have been puzzled trying to understand what was the zero scale
value of some reference materials commonly used for 18O analysis.

According to Items 011796 Gerard Olack, Item 011666-009992 and 009492 by
Willi Brand (and related items on Isogeochem historical record), the new
benzoic acids IAEA-601 and 602 are vs. SMOW. But surfing the internet I
have found that the values were vs. PDB.

At present I am outside my office and I cannot check the IAEA catalogue,
but I have been told that the general list of IR products does not specify
if the value is against SMOW or PDB.

In older time there was the golden rule that water has to be reported against
SMOW and rocks and carbonates against PDB. But what about new applications,
where the two "fields" might converge? Is ther any attempt to unify all
this?
Thanks
Francesca Serra

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV