Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: sulfur isotope analysis of gypsum
From:
Arnold van Dijk <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:39:23 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Hi River,

I have analysed anhydrite without any problems using CF-IRMS. I think it 
will even combust more easy than barite which is very stable. But you 
have to take care with the cristal water in the gypsum. That might 
affect the analyse: peak tailing because of H2SO3 forming. You might 
want to get rid of the water first before combusting.

regards,
Arnold

River He schreef:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was wondering if anyone has tried to analyze sulfur
> isotope of gypsum using CF-IRMS, and whether it is
> more difficult to analyze compared to BaSO4.  Thanks,
>
> River He
>
>
>       Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers and share what you know at http://ca.answers.yahoo.com
>
>   

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV