Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 7 Mar 2006 08:17:13 -0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Penny,
There is another, perfectly 'normal' reason for high m/z 46, namely N2 and
O2 entering the source at the same time leading to the in-situ formation of
NO2; in other words a tiny leak somewhere.
Of course, in such a case N2O will also be formed (m/z 44) but the different
resistor settings cause a 'disproportionate' amplification of the m/z 46
signal (and m/z 45, and, hence a nice transient on the 45/44 ratio trace).
For those interested replicating this effect under controlled conditions;
inject a bit of air onto a PLOT column that separates CO2 from N2 and O2,
but not N2 from O2.
Cheers,
Wolfram
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stable Isotope Geochemistry
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Penny Higgins
> Sent: 06 March 2006 14:57
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: High Mass 46 background
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> We've been running carbonates (CO2) on our Delta Plus XL, via
> the Gasbench
> and PAL, for nearly a year now. Everything has been running
> smoothly.
> Alas, in the past few weeks I've noticed that the mass 46
> background has
> increased dramatically from 10-20mV to nearly 50mV (sometimes
> more). Our
> standard deviation on d18O (based on ten peaks) has increased
> to 0.15 or
> much higher. Carbon is still running very well, and I am
> certain that water
> in the sample is not getting to the mass spectrometer source.
> We check
> linearity every day before running analyses, so I know that
> the instrument
> is performing magnificently and is linear. The mass 46
> background on the
> reference peaks is generally much lower than that of the
> sample peaks,
> though these days still tops 20mV.
>
> Does anyone know where the excess mass 46 is coming from.
> There appears to
> still be a clear separation between the nitrogen peak and the carbon
> dioxide peak coming out of the GC column. However, I wonder if the GC
> column may yet be bad. We did once draw phosphoric acid into
> the GasBench
> (a procedural problem we have since fixed). I wonder if this may have
> damaged the GC column?
>
> Any other thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~Penny
>
> *******************************************************************
> Dr. Pennilyn Higgins
> Research Associate
>
> "SIREAL"
> Stable Isotope Ratios in the Environment Analytical Laboratory
>
> Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences
> University of Rochester
> 227 Hutchison Hall
> Rochester, NY 14627
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
> Office: 209b Hutchison Hall Lab: 209 Hutchison Hall
> Voice : (585) 275-0601 Outer lab: (585) 273-1405
> FAX : (585) 244-5689 Inner lab: (585) 273-1397
>
> http://www.earth.rochester.edu/SIREAL/index.html
> *******************************************************************
>
|
|
|