Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
PEEK tubing
"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:39:49 -0700
text/plain (15 lines)
Folks,

Has any one replaced stainless steel tubing with PEEK tubing to carry He+ 
sample gas to either a Multiflow or Gasbench? Has anyone noticed any 
reaction with PEEK tubing and different gases?
Right now I have a stretch of PEEK tubing supplying Helium to the flush end 
of a two-holed needle and 1/16th inch stainless steel tubing to carry 
Helium + sample gas (either CO2 or N2O in my case) to a GV 
multiflow/Tracegas. There is no SO2, H2S, H3PO4 involved in this method. 
I'm more comfortable with stainless steel, but maybe PEEK tubing is inert 
to CO2 and N2O?

Thanks
Toti.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV