ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pier de Groot <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Nov 2006 11:32:57 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (86 lines)
Dear Steve,

You can use these materials (NBS18 and NBS19) as O-isotope reference
(secondary standard) materials when analysing carbonates. However, the
O-isotope scale is the VSMOW-SLAP scale (defined as 0 and -55.5 permil,
respectively), and any O-isotope value must be related to this scale (if
reporting to VSMOW). This means, unfortunately, for carbonates an extra
traceability step, introducing an additional uncertainty.
Certainly it is not a good idea to have more than one scale - we can have
sub-scales (but introducing more uncertainty!), as I have explained on the
list not too long time ago (look into the archives).

NBS18 is given as: -23.00 plusminus 0.07 permil and NBS19 as: -2.20 permil
(here also should be a plusminus value, since it is not the defined primary
international standard!!!; Can you comment on that Manfred Groening? Might
be introduced this way because for carbon isotopes the material has a
defined value as primary standard...).
Values taken from: M. Groening (2004) International stable isotope reference
materials, In: Handbook of stable isotope analytical techniques, Vol. 1,
P.A. De groot (ed.), Elsevier: 874-906.

I still believe we have to drop the VPDB-'scale' for oxygen (a sub-scale
where conversion to VSMOW introduces uncertainty, although not included in
the commonly used equations - conversion cannot be absolute, however...) -
it is only a historical (and probably sentimental and conservative) artefact
and more confusing than adding anything to proper analysis, and not needed
in any sense.

Hopefully this helps.
Best wishes,
Pier.


****************************************************************
Delta Isotopes Consultancy

Dr. Pier A. de Groot
Pastoor Moorkensstraat 16
2400 Mol - Achterbos
Belgium
Tel. +32 (0)14 326 205
e-mail: [log in to unmask] or [log in to unmask]

Associate editor for stable isotopes of eEarth on-line magazine
http://www.electronic-earth.net

Visit my WEB-site about my ³Handbook of Stable Isotope Analytical
Techniques², with a link to the Elsevier web site on the handbook (marked:
ŒOrder Now¹):
http://users.pandora.be/handbook/index.html
last update: August 15, 2005
Volume I is now available. Volume II is expected to be available in 2007.

****************************************************************
Why we are searching for extraterrestrial intelligence
While we lack it so much on Earth?

****************************************************************



> From: "Crowley, Stephen" <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:17:16 -0000
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Conversation: Normalisation of oxygen isotope scale for carbonates
> Subject: [ISOGEOCHEM] Normalisation of oxygen isotope scale for carbonates
> 
> I'd like to ask if it is now generally accepted practice to normalise
> the oxygen isotope scale for carbonate analysis by using values for
> NBS18 and NBS19 of -23.00 and -1.95 per mille (VPDB)?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Steve Crowley
> 
> Department of Earth & Ocean Sciences
> University of Liverpool
> 4 Brownlow Street
> Liverpool
> L69 3GP
> UK
> 
> 0151 794 5163/5164
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2