Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Sulphur Analysis
From:
"Heaton, Timothy HE" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:47:10 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
Shapna

900 mV <64> on 100ug S seems rather low. We typically get about 6000 mV
on that amount of S (in the form of about 750ug BaSO4) on our
EA-Delta+XL system.

Tim H.E. Heaton

NERC Isotope Geosciences Laboratory 
British Geological Survey
Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, England
(www.bgs.ac.uk/nigl/index.htm)

Tel. +44(0)115 936 3401
Email: [log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: Stable Isotope Geochemistry [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Shapna Mazumder
Sent: 27 February 2007 00:06
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [ISOGEOCHEM] Sulphur Analysis

Hello All who do sulphur analysis,
I have been running sulphur analysis on feathers using Bovine Liver as
working standard on a Costech EA- Delta V Advantage. After running two
dozen samples on a new combustion column and water trap the sulphur peak
is broadening, which seems to be effecting the d34S by about 1 per mil
(although the combustion hasn't been effected).  Reintegrating the
chromatogram helps if I do them individually.  Two questions, what could
be contributing to the peak broadening and in terms of source
sensitivity what should I be getting on mass 64 for a sample containing
100ug S, presently I am getting ~900 mV for 100ug S.  Any help will be
greatly appreciated.  
Thanks.
Regards,
Shapna

***************************************************************************************************************
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
***************************************************************************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV