Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 4 Dec 2006 10:27:16 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
HI Simon--
I had problems awhile back (last year, 6/22/05, Paul Eby and Wolfram
Meier-Augenstein helped if you want to check the archives) with our Plot
column and went with the PoraBond Q (Varian's replacement for the
PoraPlot Q). So far so good. He flow has been constant at 10 psi and
the peak shape has been good. The He for the flushing line comes off
the main He line too--and we're not getting the same flow through there
as we were before when the He pressure was higher. Everything else
seems ok, so we just move the flushing line to it's own He tank. The
only other issue that came up since then was some broad peaks coming
through during some water runs, unrelated to the current runs CO2
pulses. That seemed to be sample type specific (water from trees), and
may have been due to some organic contaminants coming through or perhaps
water was making it past the drying tubes--and showing up in a run
further down the line when it finally made it through the GC. The
problem went away when we stopped running those samples--and next time
we'll have to remember to treat them with carbon black.
take care
gerry
Simon Eaton wrote:
> We need a replacment PLOT column for our GasBench (CO2, H2). We
> have used CP Poraplot Q 25m. Does anyone have any experience of the
> PoraBond Q in the GasBench? It it supposed to be less easily damaged by
> any pressure fluctuations.
>
> Simon
>
>
|
|
|