Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:53:22 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
HI Steve--
We'll part with some if you'd like.
We tend to run both sulfate and sulfide standards to make sure we don't
have any thing funky going on with the oxygen. We only do S
periodically--and we do it on a Costech using the single reactor set up
(usually pre-packed). You may want to check with people who run it
regularly via the EA, and there have been some nice tidbits earlier on
the listserve. Gilles helped us out with problems we were having with
organic samples.
take care
gerry
Steve Nelson wrote:
> Hi All;
>
> I hate to ask this...
>
> I am in need of an enriched S standard. I ordered NBS-127 from NIST
> the day AFTER they had withdrawn it for "re-certification", which is
> expected to take up to 2 months. NIST won't ship it until then.
> Does anyone know if the IAEA will still sell it or will they take
> NIST's lead? We've sent inquiries, but the IAEA is slow to respond.
>
> Anyone willing to part with some NBS-127 temporarily? Maybe it
> doesn't much matter [?], but I'd prefer to stick with a sulfate rather
> than a AgS, sphalerite, or native S standard? Any other ideas/materials?
>
> I'm in the middle of setting S with a brand new dedicated Costech EA
> and I'm burning my sabbatical up quickly.
>
|
|
|