Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Box / Trap ratio fixing
From:
Gerard Olack <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:59:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
HI David--

I like getting helpful hints from other people's questions ;)

Our one DeltaXP likes to run at 0.6/0.4 (1mA emmission), and it's doing 
ok--but I should probably check the alignment better.  In the past it 
did like to autofocus on a setting that would arc when the box and trap 
currents were a bit funky, so we had to force the focusing out of that 
range--and it cleared itself up with the next cleaning (and software 
update).

One other thing to double check--source magnets, make sure they are 
proper aligned (sensitivity drop).

take care
gerry

p.s. Thanks Jim and Rolf for the power supply discussion.



On 3/8/10 5:32 AM, David Psomiadis wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> We have a Delta V Plus connected to a GBII. Six months ago we exchanged our
> filament during regular instrument check-up intralaboratory service. After
> autofocusing the source, we applied the regular tests (diagnostic) and
> everything seemed ok. However, we noticed that the ratio box/trap changed
> from 0.7/0.8 before the filament exchange, to 0.8/0.66 . During the last six
> months, this ratio reached tha value 0.9/0.64, which is the actual ratio as
> we speak. we proceeded to cleaning of the source (clear the dark shades on
> the metal parts and on the aperture according to Thermo manual) and
> autofocus again. As this ratio should be less than 1 according to the
> manufacturers, we would be grateful if there were some ideas of how we can
> lower this ratio to reach the initial value (~0.7/0.8). The stability of the
> measurements is good, however if someone should be critical on the long
> term, he could say that there is a trend for slight instability. Any help
> will be appreciated,
>
> Best regards to all,
>
> David
>
>    

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV