Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Exhaust venting of IRMS gases
From:
"Wolfram Meier-Augenstein (aps)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:30:42 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
Hi Greg,

While I haven't got the answer to your question as such, I can however tell how we solved this "problem".

To remove CO from the ConFlo "chimney" our ýengineers T'ed into an existing exhaust duct (serving a fume hood) having satisfied themselves the flow (extraction) rate of the CO duct was meeting requirements. Since the pump exhaust flow is next to nothing once the IRMS has been evacuated, our engineers were quite happy for us to feed/insert the pump exhaust hoses into the flexi-duct above the ConFlo.

Hope this helps.

Best,

Wolfram

Prof. Dr W Meier-Augenstein, FRSC
Stable Isotope Forensics
Robert Gordon University Aberdeen

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: Gregory Henkes
Sent: Tuesday, 1 November 2016 16:15
To: [log in to unmask]
Reply To: Stable Isotope Geochemistry
Subject: [ISOGEOCHEM] Exhaust venting of IRMS gases


Hello Isogeochemers,

Here’s one for the group that I can’t seem to find a solid answer to: What is the minimum flow rate of the vent used to remove pump exhaust from an irms? Bonus points if you can point me to a place where it is stated as part of some manufacturer’s spec. We’re building a new stable isotope facility at Stony Brook and this question has come up in the budgeting of air along with fume hoods, gas cabinets, etc. For whatever reason, our engineers have spec’d out 250 CFM from a relatively small diameter snorkel vent that will drop down near the instrument from the ceiling. Myself and others have pointed out that seems like absolute overkill - I’ve got visions of the Suck Cut<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AioVDsXidh0> from Wayne’s World if one were to get their head near this thing while working on the instrument.

Seriously though, any insight would be really appreciated - my urging of something benign will be heard more clearly with some hard numbers… activate the hive mind!

Thanks,
Greg




________________________________

This email has been scanned for spam and viruses by Proofpoint Essentials. Click here<https://eu1.proofpointessentials.com/index01.php?mod_id=11&mod_option=logitem&mail_id=xeEyKZ9pM7H7&r_address=w.meier-augenstein%40rgu.ac.uk&report=1> to report this email as spam.


________________________________

Robert Gordon University is the top university for graduate jobs in the UK HESA July 2015


Robert Gordon University, a Scottish charity registered under charity number SC 013781.

This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Robert Gordon University. Thank you.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV