Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Date:
Thu, 17 Feb 2022 15:25:31 -0800
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
TCEA carrier vs. purge pressure
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Jim Palandri <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Hello all,

In the past upon opening the isolation valve to the Costech AS, the 
carrier pressure (~0.85 bar) would climb to match the purge pressure 
(~1.5 bar).

Today on the first round of samples that took a long time to happen. On 
the second round it did not get there, reaching only 1.3 bar. We then 
observe in standards an attendant shift to heavier values.

What might cause this, and what is the potential solution? We suspect a 
leak, but where is likeliest place?

Thanks,
-Jim
-- 
Jim Palandri
Research Associate
Department of Earth Sciences
1272 University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403-1272

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV