Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: removal of inorganic S
From:
"Dr. H.R. Krouse" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Nov 1997 17:23:34 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Dear Carolyn,
I have been led to believe that sulfate assimilation is associated with
bacteria and plants and that higher animals are not able to convert sulfate
into S-amino acids, etc (although they interconvert organic S-compunds).
Our S-isotope food chain investigations tend to support this concept.. The
organic-S in the consumer has an isotope composition very close to that of
organic-S in the diet.. Sulfate in  consumers  is very interesting. Looking
at trace sulfate in teeth and kidney stones  and  the copious sulfate in
urine attests to sulfate dominantly originating from the oxidation of
organic-S. Oxygen isotope data for sulfate also support this. For example,
one finds that the delta 34S value for trace sulfate in marine fish teeth
is not +21 permil (ocean sulfate) but rather + 17 permil, the same as
organic-S.
Roy Krouse.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV