ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Fri, 7 Apr 1995 15:26:55 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Hi Mike,
             My feelings regarding the Thermo purchase of VG are quite
negative I'm afraid. I think that it's very unlikely that a company would
maintain competing product lines (although I am aware that Thermo has done so
in the past, although they were relatively small divisions of the company). I
would be very surprised if all product lines remained intact, and that is
clearly bad news for users. I'm probably stating the obvious, a monopoly
would mean unchecked prices and little incentive to improve the product.
   From a personal perspective, I would hate to see any more people at VG
loose their jobs (there have been more than enough lay-offs there in the last
three years), I still have freinds working there. I feel that Thermo are
going to be less inclined to axe parts of Finnigan simply from the point of
view that they have invested a good amount of time and money already. I used
to work for Thermo before I worked for VG, they are quite an agressive
company. There have been a number of occasions where they have bought out a
competitor just to be able to close them down. Lets hope that the monopoly
laws deter that course of action.

  Best regards,
                      Matt.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2