 
| Received: |
from Princeton.EDU (Princeton.EDU [128.112.128.1]) by list.uvm.edu (AIX4.2/UCB 8.7/8.7) with SMTP id LAA20026 for < [log in to unmask]>; Mon, 31 Mar 1997 11:27:18 -0500 (EST)
from geo.Princeton.EDU by Princeton.EDU (5.65b/2.125/princeton)
id AA04948; Mon, 31 Mar 97 11:26:46 -0500
from weasel.Princeton.EDU (weasel.Princeton.EDU [128.112.112.26]) by geo.Princeton.EDU (8.6.9/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA19648 for < [log in to unmask]>; Mon, 31 Mar 1997 11:28:03 -0500
from [128.112.113.220] (original.Princeton.EDU) by weasel.Princeton.EDU (4.1/Geology_Cluster_Client) id AA05557; Mon, 31 Mar 97 11:26:40 EST |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| TO: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 31 Mar 1997 11:34:27 -0500 |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| X-Sender: |
|
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thanks Ty and Ethan for the reference. This should get me on the way.
>DIC 13C extraction methodolgies were studies by
>
>Hassan, A. A., Methodologies for extraction of dissolved inorganic carbon
>for stable carbon isotope studies: Evaluation and Alternatives, U.S.
>Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations 82-6, 51 p., 1982.
>
>>Dear Isogeochemers,
>>I was wondering if I could obtain a survey of the relative merits of sampling
>>ground water for the del-13C of inorganic carbon with either of these two
>>
>>methods:
>>1. Collecting water poisoned by HgCl2 and then acidified by phosphoric acid
>>in
>>the lab.
>>2. Collecting water with BaCl2 or SrCl2 allowing BaCO3 or SrCO3 to form.
>>Filtering the precipitate and then acidifying with phosphoric acid in the lab.
>>
>>Are there any publications that compare the accuracies of each approach?
>>Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, T.C. Onstott
>>
|
|
|
