Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Kel-F vessels -Reply
From:
Joe Cali <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 1997 14:41:55 +1100
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
>I have used a stainless ferrule on the Kel--F tubes.  I felt that teflon on
>Kel-F would not make for a very good seal.  It the seal slippled the Kel-F
>tube could slip out of hte fitting.  The stainless ferrule seem to bite into
>the kel-f and hold it well
>
>Andrew Campbell

Hi Steve,
We've used a SS back ferrule and a teflon front ferrule for many years.
Our logic was based on a concern that loss of the seal might occur with
corrosion between a SS union-T fitting and a SS front ferrule.

The kel-F finger would not slip out of the fitting.  We do have a SS
bracket around the finger that also holds the finger in place.  This is a
precaution against someone breaking the Kel F finger when it is brittle
while submerged in liquid nitrogen.

It seems you can use either system in perfect safety.


Joe Cali

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV