Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
CF-IRMS Analytical Protocol
From:
Bill Showers <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 Dec 1997 08:44:55 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Dear IsotopeGeochem,

There appears to be two methods to analyze C-13 and N-15 on combustion
samples with CF-IRMS.  One manufacturer runs the N-15 and then detunes the
source and runs C-13 at reduced sensitivity (VG), while the second has a
diluter that dilutes the C-13 with more carrier gas prior to dynamic
analysis.  Both claim their protocol is superior.  What are the user's
experience with the two systems, pitfalls and positive points?

Thanks is advance and Happy Holidays,

Bill

William J. Showers
Dept of Marine Earth & Atm. Sciences,
North Carolina State Univ.

[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV