Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: comparison of CF-IRMS to sealed tube combustion
From:
"Paul D. Brooks." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 29 Jan 1998 11:45:23 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Does anyone know of published studies that compare conventional sealed tube
combustion, dual inlet mass spectrometer analysis to C/N analyzer continuous
flow isotope ratio mass spectrometer?  Preferably a comparison with actual
samples of rather than just test standards.

Thanks in advance,

Paul Brooks.


########################################################################
Paul D. Brooks, Spectroscopist,
Dept. ESPM,
151 Hilgard Hall,
UC Berkeley, Ca. 94720-3110
USA.

email [log in to unmask]

phone: (510)642-3155
FAX:   (510)643-5098
#########################################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV