Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Jul 1998 08:43:57 -0000
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
H2 storage
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; X-MAPIextension=".TXT"
From:
Attila Demeny <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Dear all,

Stan Halas' last message reminded me of the difference between the
BDH and the Bloomington zincs. Some batches of the Bloomington
zinc show huge amount effect, some show less. The amount effect
is negligible with the BDH zinc. As far as I remember Stan Halas
use BDH zinc, that would explain why he hasn't observed H2 "loss"
(if the problem is formation Zn-hydroxide).
Best regards,
Attila

Dr. Attila Demeny
Laboratory for Geochemical Research
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Budapest, Budaorsi ut 45, H-1112, Hungary
tel/fax: 36-1-319-3145
e-mail: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV