ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 1998 18:22:01 +0100
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Andrew Tait <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<v01540b0bb1ee2a1e8248@[128.112.71.13]>
Organization:
Private User
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
tullis onstott wrote the following about electron energy:

> Dear isotopers,
>
> Have any of you who analyse the isotopic composition of CO2, tried
> increasing you electron energy to around 100ev to see if it improves the
> ionization efficiency?  Are there any pubs out there on this?  I'm curious
> to know if the increase in sensitivity comes at a price of less linearity.

In my experience, the optimum sensitivity for a VG-type (Optima,
PRISM, SIRA, 602 etc). running dual inlet gasses will occur when the
eV is set at about 60V.  Pumping up to 100 is almost always
detrimental to sensitivity, and peak shape, so would suggest that
"happier" ionisation occurs at the lower setting.  In continuous flow
conditions, on the other hand, the eV setting is always at, or close
to the maximum possible value.  100-120V.  Probably because you have
to "punch" the electrons through a Helium "soup".

All technical terms used by permission

Totty  <8^)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2