| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" |
| Date: |
Fri, 29 Jan 1999 09:49:39 +0900 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Drs. Schl $B]U (Jer and Dias,
Thank you for your kind answers and suggestions.
I am sorry but I probably made a wrong English translation in my previous
question.
What I want to ask was concerning to the difference in "diameters" of the
two capillaries. The lengths of the capillaries were almost the same. In our
Combustion III system, however, the diameter of the capillary for sample gas
is apparently shorter than that for reference gas. As described by Bob, and
also in our service manual, shouldn't they be opposite? I guess the diameter
of the capillary for sample gas must be longer to get lower split ratio at
open split for sample measurement. Or I make some misleading again?
Sincerely,
Urumu Tsunogai
--------------------------------------------
Urumu Tsunogai, Dr. Sci.
Dept. Environ. Science & Technology, IGSSE
Tokyo Institute of Technology
4259 Nagatsuta-cho, Midori-ku,
Yokohama 226-8502, Japan
Tel. +81-45-924-5555 (or 5554)
Fax. +81-45-924-5554
E-mail [log in to unmask]
---------------------------------------------
|
|
|