Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Aug 1999 15:31:45 +1
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
Re: 13C18O2
From:
Frank Pawellek <[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
Authenticated sender is <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
> But N2O should be a mass 44 problem, shouldn't it?
>
> Lois Roe
>

Oops, sorry. You're right, of course. (2 x 14 + 1 x 16 = 44).
Still, it can be a problem. But I remember a remark (by S. Borella ?)
on the list some time ago, that there is a published method to
correct for this.

Frank
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Frank Pawellek
Institut fuer Geologie
Lehrstuhl fuer Sediment- und Isotopengeologie
Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum
Universitaetsstrasse 150
44801 Bochum
Germany
Phone: +49-234-700-5458
Fax: +49-234-7094-571
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV