Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
BrF5
From:
ana-voica bojar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 30 Sep 1999 09:57:55 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Dear Fluorinators,

We got a good BrF5 from:

Fluorochem Limited, Wesley street, Old Glossop
Derbyshire, SK13 9RY, GB, Fax: 01457-869360.

Worked very nice (with a +Co2 laser system).

ClF3 reacts by far not so well and the same analysed material shows a
much larger "standard deviation". At least that show results here.
Had someone symilar experience with ClF3?

I would appreciate any comment,

Ana-Voica

Ana-Voica Bojar, PhD
tel: +43/316-380-8727
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Institut fuer Geologie und Palaeontologie,
Karl-Franzens Universitaet Graz
Heinrichstrasse 26, A-8010 Graz, Austria

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV