Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - ISOGEOCHEM Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

ISOGEOCHEM Archives

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
ISOGEOCHEM Home ISOGEOCHEM Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: broad N peak with EA for KNO3 (IAEA-NO3)standard
From:
Andrew Johnston <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 11 Feb 2000 14:21:01 GMT
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
> I am using IAEA-NO3 (+4.7 permil KNO3)as a standard for an EA-DeltaPlus. If
> I use this the N peak gets quite broad (80 seconds) compared to a plant
> sample (55 seconds) and it is tailing much more. If I use IAEA-N1 (+0.4
> permil (NH4)2SO4) I also get a nice peak of 55 seconds. Earlier on I also
> had a nice peak for IAEA-NO3, and now it suddenly has changed, also the
> delta value is changed by ± 0.8 permil. I checked all the reactors and
> traps and this seems OK.
>
> As there is no CO2 peak for KNO3 I can't check on this. I added a little
> carbon to the IAEA-NO3 and then the peak looks a lot better. So the cause
> may be a too slow burning of the KNO3. Does anyone have experience with this?
> Als suggestions are welcome.

Funny you should write this... today I found exactly the same with
NaNO3 and KNO3, poor recovery of N after combustion, but if some
sugar is added things look an awful lot better and recoveries of N
are what I expected.... and the d15N values were quite different...
but the Mg(NO3)2 was the same irrespective of whether I added
sugar.

Expanding the analysis window on the Europa 2020 did not improve
things that much.

My two bits.

Andrew






Dr A.M.Johnston
SPDU
Scottish Crop Research Institute
Invergowrie
Dundee
DD2 5DA
Scotland

Tel No: (44) 1382 562731 ext 3732
Fax No: (44) 1382 562426

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV